Willingness to Pay for Green Products vs Ecological Value System

Agnieszka Leszczyńska

Résumé


Environmental concern has been an important issue for a few decades and the extent of consumer demand for eco-friendly consumption has increased. The article presents research results concerning the willingness to pay (WTP) for selected green products, defined by the auction method. Moreover, the paper presents the interrelations between the perceived benefits, individual value system and the WTP. Purpose – The aim of research is evaluation of willingness to pay (WTP) for green products, assessment of the interrelations between willingness and the individual values, perceived benefits. Design/methodology – The experiment in a form of the auction was carried out in order to assess the current WTP. Three non-eco-friendly products and their ecological equivalents were chosen. The auction was carried out among 20 persons. For evaluation of perceived benefits and individual system of values a questionnaire form was used. Findings – Not eco-friendly products were evaluated slightly higher than their real (market) value. Green products were evaluated below their market value. Considering a system of values, the self-enhancement values are mostly interrelated with the perceived environmental benefits and product functionality. In the group of people with dominating self-transcendence values a connection exists between the purchase of green products and perceived individual benefits. Research implications – Results can constitute a starting point for the research on the influence of a value system on purchase decisions of green products. Practical implications – Results can be used for establishing process of green products, and making plans for their marketing campaigns. Social implications – Results increase the knowledge about the perception and the reception of green products by clients with different systems of values. Originality/value – The article complements former research through combining the factors such as perceived benefits from using green products, user’s individual value system, and environmental effects of product production with the WTP. Paper type – research

Mots-clés


willingness to pay; ecological product

Texte intégral :

PDF (English)

Références


Aryal, K.P., Chaudhary, P., Pandit, S. Sharma, G. (2009). Consumers’ willingness to pay for organic products: a case from Kathmandu Valley. The Journal of Agriculture and Environment, 10, pp. 12–22.

Barber, N., Kuo, P., Bishop, M., Goodman, R. (2012). Measuring psychographics to assess purchase intention and willingness to pay. Journal of Consumer Marketing, 29(4), pp. 280–293.

Barber, N.A., Bishop, M., Gruen, T. (2014). Who pays more (or less) for pro-environmental consumer goods? Using the auction method to assess actual willingness-to-pay. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 40, pp. 218–227.

Bazoche, P., Deola, C., & Soler, L. G. (2008). An experimental study of wine consumers' willingness to pay for environmental characteristics. 12th Congress of the European Association of Agriculture Economists, http://www.legrenelle-environment.fr/grenelleenvironment.

Bechwati, N.N. (2011). Willingness to pay for professional services. Journal of Product & Brand Management 20(1), pp. 75–83.

Bennett, G., & Williams, F. (2011). Mainstream green. The Red Papers, 4, pp. 1–131.

Bjerke, F. (1992). Forbrugernes interesse for økologiske produkter. Roskilde: Roskilde Universitetscenter: Institut for samfundsøkonomi og planlægning.

Brown, J., Wahlers, R. (1998) The environmentally concerned consumer: An exploratory study. Journal of Marketing Theory and Practice, 6(2), pp. 39–47.

Canavari, M., Nocella, G., Scarpa, R. (2003). Stated willingness to pay for environment-friendly production of apples and peaches: web-based versus in-person surveys. Paper presented at the 83rd EAAE Seminar, Chania, 4–6 September.

De Groot, J. I. M., Steg, L. (2007). Value orientation and environmental beliefs in five countries: Validity of an instrument to measure egoistic, altruistic and biospheric value orientations. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 38(3), pp. 318–332.

D'Souza, C., Taghian, M., Khosla, R. (2007). Examination of environmental beliefs and its impact on the influence of price, quality and demographic characteristics with respect to green purchase intention. Journal of Targeting, Measurement & Analysis for Marketing, 15(2), pp. 69–78.

Follows, S. B., Jobber, D. (2000). Environmentally responsible purchase behaviour: A test of a consumer model. European Journal of Marketing, 34(5–6), pp. 723–746.

Gil, J.M., Gracia, A., Sanchez, M. (2000). Market segmentation and willingness to pay for organic products in Spain. International Food and Agribusiness Management Review, 3, 207–26.

Grail Research, LLC. (2009). The green revolution. Retrieved from http://grailresearch.com/pdf/ ContenPodsPdf/The_Green_Revolution.pdf.

Griskevicius, V., Cialdini, R. B., Goldstein, N. J. (2008). Peer influence: An underestimated and underemployed lever for change. Sloan Management Review 49, pp. 84–88.

Grunert, S. C. (1992). Den danske forbruger og økologiske fødevarer. Aarhus: The Aarhus School of Business, Department of Information Science. Series H62.

Harland, P., Staats, H., Wilke, H. A. (1999). Explaining proenvironmental intention and behavior by personal norms and the theory of planned behavior. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 29(12), pp. 2505–2528.

Kayaman, R., Arasli, H. (2007). Customer based brand equity: Evidence from the hotel industry. Journal of Managing Service Quality, 17(1), pp. 92–109.

Kilbourne, W. E., Grünhagen, M., Foley, J. (2005). A cross-cultural examination of the relationship between materialism and individual values. Journal of Economic Psychology, 26, pp. 624–641.

Kim, H., Kim, W. (2005). The relationship between brand equity and firms' performance in luxury hotels and chain restaurants. Tourism Management, 26, pp. 549–560.

Kristensen,D., Creel, M. (2012). Estimation of dynamic latent variable models using simulated non-parametric moments, Econometrics Journal 15(3), pp. 490–515.

Lusk, J.L., Hudson, D. (2004). Willingness-to-Pay Estimates and Their Relevance to Agribusiness Decision Making. Review of Agricultural Economics, 26(2), pp. 152–169.

McKenzie, D. (1991). The rise of the green consumer. Consumer Policy Review, 1(2), pp. 68–75.

Miller, KM, Hofstetter R, Krohmer H., Zhang ZJ (2011). How should consumers’ willingness to pay be measured? An empirical comparison of state-of-the-art approaches. Journal of Marketing Research 48(1), pp. 172–184.

Millock, K., Hansen, L.G. Wier, M., Anderson, L.M. (2002). Willingness to Pay for Organic products: A Comparison between Survey Data and Panel Data from Denmark, AKF Denmark.

Nordlund, A. M., Garvill, J. (2003). Effects of values, problem awareness and personal norm on willingness to reduce personal car use. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 23, pp. 339–347.

Orth, U. R., Wolf, M. M., Dodd, T. H. (2005). Dimensions of wine region equity and their impact on consumer preferences. The Journal of Product and Brand Management, 14(2–3), pp. 88–97.

Ottman, J. A. (2011). The new rules of green marketing: Strategies, tools and inspiration for sustainable branding. San Francisco, CA: Berrett-Koehler Publishers, Inc.

Roberts, J. (1996) Green consumers in the 1990s: Profile and implications for advertising. Journal of Business Research, 36(2), pp. 217–231.

Schultz, P. W. (2001). The structure of environmental concern: Concern for self, other people, and the biosphere. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 21, pp. 327–339.

Schultz, P. W., Gouveia, G. V., Cameron, L. D., Tankha, G., Schmuck, P., Franêk, M. (2005). Values and their relationship to environmental concern and conservation behavior. Journal of Cross-Cultural Psychology, 36, pp. 457–465.

Schultz, P. W., Shriver, C., Tabanico, J. J., Khazian, A. M. (2004). Implicit connections with nature. Journal of Environmental Psychology, 24, pp. 31–42.

Schwartz, S. H. (1994). Are there universal aspects in the structure and contents of human values?. Journal of Social Issues, 50(4), pp. 19–45.

Schwartz, S. H., Howard, J. A. (1981). A normative decision-making model of altruism. In J.P. Rushton, R.M. Sorrentino (Eds.), Altruism and helping behavior (pp. 89–211). Hillsdale, NJ: Erlbaum.

Stern, P. C., Dietz, T., Kalof, L., Guagnano, G. A. (1995). Values, beliefs, and proenvironmental action: Attitude formation toward emergent attitude objects. Journal of Applied Social Psychology, 25, pp. 1611–1636.

Thøgersen, J. (2002). Direct experience and the strength of the personal norm behavior relationship. Psychology and Marketing, 19(10), pp. 881–893.

Titterington, A., Davies, C., Cochrane, A. (1996) Forty shades of green: A classification of green consumerism in Northern Ireland. Journal of Euro-Marketing, 5(3), pp. 43–55.

Umberger, W.J., Feuz, D.M., Calkins, C.R. Killinger, K. (2002). U.S. consumer preference and willingness-to-pay for domestic corn-fed beef versus international grass-fed beef measured through an experimental auction. Agribusiness 18, pp. 491–504.

Voelckner, F. (2006). An empirical comparison of methods for measuring consumers' willingness to pay. Marketing Letters, 17(2), pp. 137–149.

Webster, F. (1975). Determining the characteristics of the socially conscious consumer. Journal of Consumer Research, 2, 188–196.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/ijsr.2014.3.0.67
Date of publication: 2015-05-22 13:06:47
Date of submission: 2015-04-22 18:57:46


Statistiques


Visibilité des résumés - 1698
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF (English) - 1

Indicateurs



Renvois

  • Il n'y a présentement aucun renvoi.


Droit d'auteur (c) 2015, International Journal of Synergy and Research

Licence Creative Commons
Ce(tte) œuvre est mise à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.