CONTENT OF SULPHATE SULPHUR IN DIFFERENT TYPES OF SOILS IN THE PODKARPACKIE REGION

Jan Gąsior, Bernadeta Alvarez

Abstract


The aim of the investigation was the estimation of sulphate sulphur in soils in the Podkarpackie Province. The content of sulphate sulphur within the soils developed on flysch works subject to strong spatial variability of 0.87 g kg-1 in the Przemyoel Foothills to 2.00 g kg-1 in the Cieżkowickie and Strzyżowskie Foothills. The content of sulphate sulphur in soils is positively correlated with the content of humus in the Western Bieszczady Mountains and the content of colloidal clay fraction within the Tarnogrodzki Plateau and Rzeszów Foothills. In soil types: Haplic Cambisol, Haplic Cambisol (Dystric), Haplic Cambisol Podzolised, Haplic Podzol and Haplic Luvisol found in the Podkarpackie Province there is no significant variation of the sulphate Sulphur content (average 1.73-1.93mg100g-1), but less sulphur was found in Haplic Cambisol (Eutric) soils.


Full Text:

PDF

References


B r a d s l e y C. E., L a n c a s t e r J. D.: Soil Sci. Soc. Amer. Proc., 24, 265, 1960.

D i a m o n d S., H a n l e y P. K.: Sulphur in Agric., Dublin, 107, 1, 1970.

E r i k s e n J., M u r p h y M. D., S c h u n g E.: The soil sulphur cycle. In: Sulphur in Agroecosystems. Ed. E. Schung. Dordrecht-Boston-London. Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1998.

FAO/UNESCO: SoilMapof the World. Revised Legend. Soils Bulletin 60.FAORome, 1990.

J a k u b u s M., C z e k a ³ a J.: Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Roln., 456, 323, 1988.

Kaczor A., Zuzańska J.: Chemia. Dydaktyka. Ekologia. Metrologia, 14, 1-2, 69, 2009.

K o n d r a c k i J.: Geografia regionalna Polski. Warszawa, PWN, 2002.

Koter M., Grzesiuk W., Chodań J.: Zesz. Nauk.WSROlsztyn, 16, 292, 275, 1963.

K u l c z y c k i G., P a t o r c z y k - P y t l i k B.: Ekotoksykologia w Ochronie Środowiska, 203, 212, 2008.

M c G r a t h S. P., Z h a o F. J.: Soil Use and Management, 11, 110, 1995.

M o t o w i c k a - T e r e l a k T., T e r e l a k H.: Zesz. Nauk. AR Szczecin, Rolnictwo, 81, 7, 2000.

R e j m a n - C z a j k o w s k a M.: Roczn. Glebozn., 24, 2, 203, 1973.

S c h e r e r H.W.: Eur. J. Agron., 14, 81, 2001.

Singh B.R., Abrahemsen G., S t u a n e s A.: Soil Sci. Soc. Am. J., 44, 75, 1980.

S k ł o d o w s k i P.: Roczn. Glebozn., 19(1), 99, 1968.

S z u l c W., Rutkowska B., Łabętowicz J.: Annales UMCS, Sec. E, 59(1), 55, 2004.

T e r e l a k H., M o t o w i c k a - T e r e la k T., P a s t e r n a c k i J., W i l k o s S.: Pam. Puł, Supl., 891, 1, 1998.

Terelak H., Piotrowska M., Motowicka-Terelak T., Stuczyñski T., Budzyńska K.: Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Roln., 418, 45, 1995.

Właśniewski S., Kaniuczak J., Hajduk E.: Zesz. Nauk. PTG, 11, 265, 2009.

Zadrożny P., Miechówka A., N i c i a P.: Zesz. Probl. Post. Nauk Roln., 520, 571, 2007.

Z a l e w s k i W.: Problemy ochrony środowiska. Wyd. WSR-P Siedlce, 1995.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/pjss.2012.45.1.29
Data publikacji: 2016-04-05 10:30:02
Data złożenia artykułu: 2016-03-31 12:55:23


Statistics


Total abstract view - 205
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF - 84

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2016 Jan Gąsior, Bernadeta Alvarez

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.