Economic Justification of Judicial Discretion

Tomasz Guzik

Abstract


The thesis of this article is that judicial discretion can be justified by economic reasons. Therefore, the work is divided into three parts. First, there are presented two basic approaches towards judicial discretion which are present in Polish legal literature. Second, there are introduced two self-prepared cases from two different areas of law which are penal and tort law. With the usage of economic tools, there is shown that giving judges decisional freedom can lead to economically efficient sentences. According to the second example, judge’s discretional power to calculate the amount of compensation can be very important to maintain efficient tort.


Keywords


economic analysis of law; economic justification; judicial discretion

Full Text:

PDF

References


Cooter R., Ulen T., Law & Economics, Boston 2012.

Discretion, www.lexico.com/definition/discretion [access: 5.01.2020].

Friedman D., Law and Economics, [in:] The New Palgrave Dictionary of Economics, London 2018.

Kopaliński W., Słownik wyrazów obcych i zwrotów obcojęzycznych, Warszawa 1988.

Kornhauser L., The Economic Analysis of Law, https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/legal-econanalysis [access: 26.05.2020].

Posner R., Economic Analysis of Law, Boston 1986.

Sanetra W., Swoboda decyzji sędziowskiej z perspektywy Sądu Najwyższego, [in:] Dyskrecjonalność w prawie, red. T. Stawecki, W. Staśkiewicz, Warszawa 2010.

Stelmach J., Spór o ekonomiczną analizę prawa, [in:] Analiza ekonomiczna w zastosowaniach prawniczych, red. J. Stelmach, M. Soniewicka, Warszawa 2007.

Stelmach J., Brożek B., Metody prawnicze, Kraków 2004.

Stelmach J., Brożek B., Załuski W., Dziesięć wykładów o ekonomii prawa, Warszawa 2007.

Stelmach J., Sarkowicz R., Filozofia prawa XIX i XX wieku, Kraków 1999.

Ulen T., The changing methodologies of Law and Economics, [in:] Encyclopedia of Law and Economics, ed. G. De Geest, https://doi.org/10.4337/9781782547457 [access: 28.05.2020].

Wojciechowski B., Dyskrecjonalność sędziowska. Studium teoretyczno-prawne, Toruń 2004.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/sil.2020.29.3.87-97
Data publikacji: 2020-06-30 09:44:35
Data złożenia artykułu: 2020-04-29 09:17:39


Statistics

Total abstract view - 138
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF - 0

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Tomasz Guzik

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.