Discretionary Power of Public Administration and Control of Public Debt: The Citizen and the Judge between the Law and the Precedent

Giovanni Pesce

Abstract


Discretionary power, a central feature of administrative power, comes into play when administration is called to select an option between two or more solution and a way of balancing between public and private interests. After the 20th century, devastated by wars, public deficit and debt, most State models circumscribed their markets to the detriment of the global one, turning the old economic models into new ones after the 1958 Treaty of Rome and, after the phase following the Maastricht Treaty of 1992, and the crisis of 2008, the final concept is that the EU Members States should restructure the public finances, facing the increase of the public goods and services demand and with the rested rights. The purpose of this article was to enquire whether the European and national rules may limit the discretionary power while expanding the administrative one.


Keywords


public debt; citizen; public administration; discretionary power; judicial control

Full Text:

PDF

References


LITERATURE

Bockenforde E.W., State, Society, and Liberty, New York 1991.

Cartabia M., Weiler J.H.H., L’Italia in Europa, Bologna 2000.

Cassese S., Lo spazio giuridico globale, Bari–Laterza 2003.

Cassese S., Problemi delle ideologie dei giudici, [in:] Studi in memoria di Carlo Esposito, Padova 1972.

Corso G., Manuale di diritto amministrativo, Torino 2010.

Ferrajoli L., Diritti fondamentali. Un dibattito teorico, Roma–Bari 2001.

Green Paper on the feasibility of stability bond European Commission Green Paper “Feasibility of introducing Stability Bonds”, COM(2011) 818, final.

Hare R., Moral Thinking: Its Levels, Method, and Point, Oxford 1981.

Holmes S., Sunstein C.R., The Cost of Rights, New York 1999.

Hume D., Essay VIII: Of Public Credit, [in:] R. Fleming, Political Discourses, Edinburgh 1752.

Jonas H., Das Prinzip Verantwortung, Frankfurt 1979.

Lamond G., Precedent and analogy in legal reasoning, 2006, http://plato.stanford.edu/archives/sum2006/entries/legal-reas-prec [access: 5.01.2020].

Merusi F., Il sogno di Diocleziano. Ruolo del diritto pubblico nelle crisi economiche, “Rivista trimestrale di diritto penale dell’economia” 2013, No. 1.

Nigro M., Giustizia amministrativa, Bologna 1983.

Patroni Griffi F., La sentenza amministrativa, [in:] Trattato di diritto amministrativo, a cura di S. Cassese, tomo V, Milano 2003.

Pugh C., Sustainability, the Environment and Urbanization, New York 1996.

Raitio J., The Principle of Legal Certainty in EC Law, Dordrecht 2011.

Rawls J., A Theory of Justice, Cambridge, Massachusetts 1971.

Tarello G., Storia della cultura giuridica moderna, Bologna 1976.

Waldron J., Judges as moral reasoners, “International Journal of Constitutional Law” 2009, Vol. 7(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/icon/mon035.

Ziller J., Della Cananea G., Il nuovo diritto pubblico europeo, Torino 2019.

LEGAL ACTS

Protocol No. 12 on the excessive deficit procedure annexed to the Treaty on European Union (Official Journal 115, 9.05.2008, p. 0279–0280).

Treaty establishing a Constitution for Europe.

Treaty on the Functioning of the European Union (consolidated version Official Journal C 326, 26.10.2012, p. 0001–0390).

Treaty on Stability, Coordination and Economic and Monetary Union governance.

CASE LAW

Court of First Instance, 28 February 2002 (N-86/95-General Shipping companies).

Decision of 29 April 1979, Sunday Times v. Regno Unito.

ECJ, 13 December 1979, case C- 44/79, Hauer.

ECJ, 6 October 1982, case C-283/81, Cilfit srl e Lanificio di Gavardo spa v. Ministero della Sanità, in Racc., 1982, 3415.

ECJ, 13 July 2004, case C-27/04.

ECJ, 15 September 2005, case C-495/03, Intermodal Transports BV v. Staatssecretaris van Financiën, Racc., 2005, I-8151.

EHCR, Kruslin v. Francia, 24 April 1990.

EHCR, Kokkinakis v. Grecia, 25 May 1993.

EHCR, Cantoni v. Francia, 15 November 1996.

EHCR, Kopp v. Svizzera, 25 March 1998.

EHCR, Valenzuela Contreras v. Spain, 30 July 1999.

EHCR, Achour v. Francia, 29 March 2006.

EHCR, Pessino v. Francia, 10 October 2006.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/sil.2020.29.3.117-134
Data publikacji: 2020-06-30 09:44:38
Data złożenia artykułu: 2020-04-30 10:30:01


Statistics

Total abstract view - 19
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF - 0

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020 Giovanni Pesce

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.