The Role of State in Achieving Sustainable Development Goals in Slovenia

Senko Plicanic


The article analyses the importance of an active role of the state in achieving the Sustainable Development Goals. Its starting point is that despite the fact that today there is a growing recognition in the world that for the implementation of sustainable development an active role of the state and local self-governing communities is indispensable and despite the fact that in Slovenia such a role of the state in implementing sustainable development stems from its Constitution, so far, too little has been done in Slovenia to achieve the Sustainable Development Goals. The purpose of this article is to analyse theoretical arguments and the Constitution in order to show the need for an active role of the state in implementing sustainable development goals, and also to discuss basic steps to be implemented in order to achieve an active role of the state in Slovenia. In this article comparative and analytical methods were used in studying the literature and regulation. The article, based on theoretical arguments and the constitutional analysis, identifies the need for an active role of the state in implementing sustainable development goals, and proposes arguments for it and also basic steps toward an active role of the state. The discussed topic is new and this article contributes to the field some fundamental arguments for the active role of state and for the more comprehensive policy-making. The article offers theoretical and constitutional arguments to be implemented in order to transform the present role of the state from a passive one into an active role and its findings are meant to be used by policy-makers and law-makers as a significant argument to pursue more active role of the state in implementing sustainable development goals.


the Sustainable Development Goals; an active role of the state; comprehensive state sustainable development plan

Full Text:



Bahor M., Trajnostni razvoj v okoljski politiki Evropske unije, Ljubljana 2005 (master’s thesis, University of Ljubljana).

Bosselmann K., The Principle of Sustainability: Transforming Law and Governance, New York 2017.

Breuer R., Umweltschutz, [in:] E. Schmidt-Assman, Besonderes Verwaltungsrecht, Berlin 1988.

Breyer S., Regulation and Its Reform, Cambridge 1982.

Bugarič B., From Plan to Market – One Way or Alternative Paths? (A Critique of Institutional Reforms in Central and Eastern Europe), Ljubljana 1997 (doctoral thesis, University of Ljubljana).

Climate Transparency, Brown to Green Report 2018, [access: 12.06.2020].

Coase R., The Problem of Social Cost, [in:] Law and the Environment, eds. V.R. Percival, C.D. Alevizatos, Philadelphia 1997.

Creating our future: Sustainable development for New Zealand, [access: 12.06.2020].

Dryzek S.J., The Politics of the Earth: Environmental Discourses, New York 1997.

Europe 2020: A European Strategy for Smart, Sustainable and Inclusive Growth, [access: 12.06.2020].

Hardin G., The Tragedy of the Commons, [in:] Foundations of Environmental Law and Policy, ed. R.L. Revesz, New York 1997.

Klein N., The Economic System We Have Created Global Warming, 2015, [access: 12.06.2020].

Klein N., This Changes Everything: Capitalism vs the Climate, New York 2014.

Kloepfer M., Umweltrecht, München 1989.

Kroll Ch., Warchold A., Pradhan P., Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs): Are we successful in turning trade-offs into synergies?, 2019, [access: 12.06.2020].

Latin H., Ideal Versus Real Regulatory Efficiency: Implementation of Uniform Standards and “Fine-Tuning” Regulatory Reforms, “Stanford Law Review” 1985, vol. 37(5), DOI:

Leopold A., A Sand County Almanac, [in:] Law and the Environment, eds. V.R. Percival, C.D.Alevizatos, Philadelphia 1997.

Nolon J.R., Salkin P.E., Climate Change and Sustainable Development Law in a Nutshell, USA 2011.

OECD Better Policies for Sustainable Development, A New Framework for Policy Coherence: Study, 2016, [access: 12.06.2020].

O’Gorman R., Environmental Constitutionalism: A Comparative Study, “Transnational Environmental Law” 2017, vol. 6(3), DOI:

Ostrom E., Governing the Commons: The Evolution of Institutions for Collective Action, 1990, [access: 12.06.2020].

Princen S., Agenda-setting strategies in EU policy processes, “Journal of European Public Policy” 2011, vol. 18(7), DOI:

Rose-Ackerman S., Controlling Environmental Policy: The Limits of Public Law in Germany and the United States, New Haven – London 1995.

Sachs J.D., The Age of Sustainable Development, New York 2015.

Slovenia Green, [access: 12.06.2020].

Stallworthy M., Sustainability, Land Use and Environment: A Legal Analysis, London 2002.

Strategija razvoja Slovenije 2030 (draft), [access: 12.06.2020].

Tarlock A. Dan, Environmental Protection: The Potential Misfit Between Equity and Efficiency, “University of Colorado Law Review” 1992, vol. 63(4).

Tarlock A. Dan, The Nonequilibrium Paradigm in Ecology, [in:] Law and the Environment, eds. V.R. Percival, C.D. Alevizatos, Philadelphia 1997.

The 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development, [access: 12.06.2020].

The Ecological Community, ed. S.R. Gottlieb, New York 1997.

The Vision of Slovenia 2050 – The Design of a Comprehensive Development Plan of Slovenia, which the Government prepared in 2017, [access: 12.06.2020].

Towards a sustainable Europe by 2030, [access: 12.06.2020].

UN Environment Programme, [access: 12.06.2020].

UN SDG, United Nation Sustainable Development Goals, [access: 12.06.2020].

Za zeleni razvojni preboj – Plan B za Slovenijo 4.0: Prispevek za strategijo razvoja Slovenije 2014–2020, [access: 12.06.2020].

Data publikacji: 2020-09-30 22:31:53
Data złożenia artykułu: 2020-07-22 12:32:58


Total abstract view - 868
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF - 0



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 Senko Plicanic

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.