Taxation of Instagram Influencers

Michal Radvan


This scientific article discusses issues related to the taxation of Instagram influencers. Its main objective is to define how the influencers’ incomes should be taxed. To achieve this primary purpose, the partial objective is defined to give the list of (legal) cooperation contracts between the marketers and influencers. The hypothesis that there is no need to adopt new specific tax law norms to tax influencers’ incomes properly, at least in developed countries, was confirmed. All jurisdictions are taxing influencers’ incomes. It is always necessary to focus on the content of the relationship generating influencer’s income, as the principle of priority of content over form must be used. The tax liability is influenced only by the tax base. The tax rate and other structural components of the tax remain the same for different types of incomes. Generally, it is always better for the influencer to have a trading license (to be a businessman) than tax his/her incomes as incomes from copyright. Incomes from dependent activities based on labour law contract or occasional incomes are not probable for a typical influencer, and still, the taxation in this way is not really favourable. The novelty of the presented research lies in the fact that no scientific articles deal with the covered issues published so far. The author believes that the article has a cognitive value for both science and practice.


tax law; taxation; copyright; income; influencer; Instagram

Full Text:




Casaló L.V., Flavián C., Ibáñez-Sánchez S., Influencers on Instagram: Antecedents and Consequences of Opinion Leadership, “Journal of Business Research“ 2020, vol. 117(9), DOI:

Cotter K., Playing the Visibility Game: How Digital Influencers and Algorithms Negotiate Influence on Instagram, “New Media and Society” 2019, vol. 21(4), DOI:

De Veirman M., Cauberghe V., Hudders L., Marketing through Instagram Influencers: The Impact of Number of Followers and Product Divergence on Brand Attitude, “International Journal of Advertising” 2017, vol. 36(5), DOI:

Kostikidis S., Influencer Income and Tax Treaties, “Bulletin for International Taxation” 2020, vol. 74(6).

Koukal P., Autorské právo, public domain a lidská práva, Brno 2019.

Kůdelíková K., Skrytá reklama na sociálních sítích – diplomová práce, Brno 2020.

Molenaar D., Grams H., Influencer Income and Tax Treaties, “Bulletin for International Taxation” 2020, vol. 74(9).

Petríková L., Závislá práca a pracovné právo – aktuálny stav, „Práce a mzdy“ 2019, vol. 14(7–8).

Radvan M., Taxation of Employment Income in the Czech Republic, “Kwartalnik Prawa Podatkowego” 2018, vol. 20(1).

Şekeroğlu S., Bilgin S., Influencer Marketing and Taxation of Influencer in Turkey, [in:] New Trends in Social Sciences, eds. H. Özüdoğru, T. Çetin, H. Kara, Klaipeda 2019.


Bern T., Social Media Trends Report: Key Insights From Q3 2020, [access: 19.04.2021].

Bern T., State of Influencer Marketing Report: Effects of Coronavirus, [access: 19.04.2021].

Droesch B., Instagram’s New Explore Ads Signal Potential Changes to Organic Reach, 9.07.2019, [access: 19.04.2021].

European Commission, Taxes in Europe Database, [access: 27.04.2021].

Facebook for Business, How Instagram Boosts Brands and Drives Sales, 6.02.2019, [access: 19.04.2021].

Facebook for Business, How to Take Your Instagram Content to the Next Level, 14.02.2019, [access: 16.04.2021].

Ghatt J., Report: Top Brands Spent $255M on Influencers with Fake Engagement, 5.03.2020, [access: 19.04.2021].

Hopper HW, Instagram Rich List 2020, 19.04.2021, [access: 19.04.2021].

HubSpot, Instagram Engagement Report – What Your Company Needs to Know for 2020, 10.03.2021, [access: 19.04.2021].

Influencer Marketing Hub, The State of Influencer Marketing 2020: Benchmark Report, 14.02.2021, [access: 19.04.2021].

Instagram, Instagram Branded Content. Facebook for Business, 26.04.2021, [access: 26.04.2021].

Iqbal M., Instagram Revenue and Usage Statistics (2021), 24.05.2021, [access: 16.04.2021].

Kemp S., Digital 2020: October Global Statshot, 20.10.2020, [access: 16.04.2021].

McClendon A., It’s estimated that Fashion Nova spent $40M on influencer marketing last year, 2.03.2020, [access: 19.04.2021].

Mediakix, The Influencer Marketing Trends to Know for 2021, 17.04.2021, [access: 19.04.2021].

Radvan M., Czech Tax Law, Brno 2020, [access: 27.04.2021].

Social Blade, Top 50 Instagram Business Accounts Sorted by Followers, [access: 19.04.2021].

Takumi, Into the Mainstream: Influencer Marketing in Society, [access: 19.04.2021].


Council Directive (EU) 2016/1164 of 12 July 2016 laying down rules against tax avoidance practices that directly affect the functioning of the internal market (OJ EU L 193/1, 19/07/2016).

Directive 2005/29/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council of 11 May 2005 concerning unfair business-to-consumer commercial practices in the internal market and amending Council Directive 84/450/EEC, Directives 97/7/EC, 98/27/EC and 2002/65/EC of the European Parliament and of the Council and Regulation (EC) no. 2006/2004 of the European Parliament and of the Council (OJ EU L 149/22, 11.06.2005).

Data publikacji: 2021-06-30 23:19:05
Data złożenia artykułu: 2021-04-30 15:04:44


Total abstract view - 1836
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF - 0



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2021 Michal Radvan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.