The Image of a Lawyer: Some Remarks from the Perspective of the “Tripartite Crisis” as Seen by Susan Daicoff

Adam Zienkiewicz

Abstract


Conducting multi-aspect theoretical and empirical research on the proper understanding, determinants, and shaping of the image of contemporary lawyers, as well as their actual professional, moral, and psychological condition, has significant cognitive and practical justification. This article addresses the issue of the image of a lawyer, understood mainly as a way in which lawyers are perceived, presented, and evaluated not only by members of society or the media, but also by themselves. The considerations are inspired by (and take as their starting point) what Susan Daicoff identified as a “tripartite crisis”, which can significantly impact the modern image of lawyers. The main objective of this paper is to formulate several basic comments (preliminary principles) for research on the image and professional, moral, and psychological condition of lawyers, as well as to highlight selected categories particularly important for their development, particularly those related to the relationship between professionalism and ethics. The article is primarily theoretical and legal in nature. The author addresses both scientific and conceptual ideas. Given the universality and utility of the issues discussed, the considerations may be of interest not only to national, but also to EU and international researchers in the science and practice of law, as well as to other social sciences, broadly interested in researching and improving the condition and image of lawyers, enhancing their self-awareness, professionalism, ethical conduct, and personal and professional satisfaction.


Keywords


lawyers’ image; tripartite crisis of legal practice; lawyers’ self-reflection; lawyers’ personality; professionalism and ethics of lawyers

Full Text:

PDF

References


Cochran R., DiPippa J., Peters M., The Counselor-at-Law: A Collaborative Approach to Client Interviewing and Counseling, New York 2006.

Daicoff S., Comprehensive Law Practice: Law as a Healing Profession, Durham 2011.

Daicoff S., Lawyer, Be Thyself: An Empirical Investigation of the Relationship between the Ethic of Care, the Feeling Decision-Making Preference, and Lawyer Wellbeing, “Virginia Journal of Social Policy & The Law” 2008–2009, vol. 16(87).

Daicoff S., Lawyer Personality Traits and Their Relationship to Various Approaches to Lawyering, [in:] The Affective Assistance of Counsel: Practicing Law as Healing Profession, ed. M. Silver, Durham 2007.

Daicoff S., Lawyer, Know Thyself: A Psychological Analysis of Personality Strengths and Weaknesses, Washington 2004. DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/10751-000

Daicoff S., Lawyer, Know Thyself: A Review of Empirical Research on Attorney Bearing on Professionalism, “The American University Law Review” 1997, vol. 46.

Gardner H., Intelligence Reframed: Multiple Intelligences for the 21st Century, New York 1999.

Gardner H., Multiple Intelligences: New Horizons in Theory and Practice, New York 2006.

Gutterman S., Collaborative Law: A New Model of Dispute Resolution, Denver 2004.

Kaczmarek P., Dystans do roli w zawodzie prawnika, Warszawa 2019.

Kaczmarek P., Tożsamość prawnika jako wykonawcy roli zawodowej, Warszawa 2014.

Kalisz A., Zienkiewicz A., Mediacja sądowa i pozasądowa. Zarys wykładu, Warszawa 2014.

Kalisz A., Zienkiewicz A., Polubowne rozwiązywanie konfliktów w pomocy społecznej. Komunikacja, psychologia konfliktów, negocjacje i mediacje socjalne, Sosnowiec 2015.

Kozielecki J., Koncepcje psychologiczne człowieka, Warszawa 2000.

Krieger L., The Inseparability of Professionalism and Personal Satisfaction: Perspectives on Values, Integrity and Happiness, “Clinical Law Review” 2005, vol. 11.

Krieger L., The Most Ethical of People, the Least Ethical of People: Proposing Self-Determination Theory to Measure Professional Character Formation, “University of St. Thomas Law Journal” 2011, vol. 8(2).

Krieger L., What We’re Not Telling Law Students (and Lawyers) That They Really Need to Know: Some Thoughts in Action Toward Revitalizing the Profession from Its Roots, “Journal of Law and Health” 1998–1999, vol. 13(1).

Lewicki R., Saunders D., Barry B., Minton J., Zasady negocjacji. Kompendium wiedzy dla trenerów i menedżerów, Poznań 2005.

Łojko E., Dziurnikowska-Stefańska M. (eds.), Wartości a sukces zawodowy prawników. Granice kompromisu?, Warszawa 2011.

Macfarlane J., The New Lawyer: How Settlement Is Transforming the Practice of Law, Vancouver 2008. DOI: https://doi.org/10.59962/9780774855792

Mądrzycki T., Osobowość jako system tworzący i realizujący plany, Gdańsk 2002.

Perry J., Therapeutic Pedagogy: Thoughts on Integral Professional Formation, “Revista Juridica UPR” 2009, vol. 78(1).

Perry J., Thinking Like a Professional, “Journal of Legal Education” 2008, vol. 58(2).

Piłat-Borcuch M., Pomiędzy tożsamością osobową a postawą społeczną, “Zeszyty Naukowe Politechniki Śląskiej. Organizacja i Zarządzanie” 2013, no. 65.

Sarkowicz R., Amerykańska etyka prawnicza, Kraków 2004.

Sarkowicz R., O nie całkiem marginalnym problemie etyki prawniczej, [in:] Etyka prawnicza. Stanowiska i perspektywy, eds. H. Izdebski, P. Skuczyński, Warszawa 2008.

Schiltz P., On Being a Happy, Healthy, and Ethical Member of an Unhappy, Unhealthy, and Unethical Profession, “Vanderbilt Law Review” 1999, vol. 52.

Shaffer T., Cochran R., Lawyers, Clients, and Moral Responsibility, St. Paul 1994.

Skuczyński P., Integralność, [in:] Etyka zawodów prawniczych. Etyka prawnicza, eds. H. Izdebski, P. Skuczyński, Warszawa 2006.

Skuczyński P., Status etyki prawniczej, Warszawa 2010.

Wright J.K., Lawyers as Peacemakers: Practicing Holistic, Problem-Solving Law, Chicago 2010.

Zienkiewicz A., Feeling versus Thinking Style of Decision-making – czynniki personalne sprzyjające kooperacji stron w procesie decyzyjnym prowadzonym w celu rozwiązania sporu, [in:] Zagadnienia stosowania prawa. Perspektywa teoretyczna i dogmatyczna, eds. W. Dziedziak, B. Liżewski, Lublin 2015.

Zienkiewicz A., Holizm prawniczy z perspektywy Comprehensive Law Movement, Warszawa 2018.

Zienkiewicz A., Lawyer’s Integrity: Some Remarks from the Perspective of a Holistic Approach to Legal Practice, “Krytyka Prawa. Niezależne Studia nad Prawem” 2021, vol. 13(3). DOI: https://doi.org/10.7206/kp.2080-1084.476

Zienkiewicz A., Prawnik jako peacemaker – przeprosiny, przebaczenie, pojednanie w opanowywaniu sporów prawnych, “Ruch Prawniczy, Ekonomiczny i Socjologiczny” 2019, vol. 81(4). DOI: https://doi.org/10.14746/rpeis.2019.81.4.4

Zienkiewicz A., Terapeutyczny wymiar prawa, [in:] Wymiary prawa. Teoria, filozofia, aksjologia, eds. M. Herman, M. Krotoszyński, P.F. Zwierzykowski, Poznań 2018.

Zienkiewicz A., The Lawyer Personality. Właściwości personalne prawnika a wykonywanie roli zawodowej, “Archiwum Filozofii Prawa i Filozofii Społecznej” 2018, no. 1.

Zienkiewicz A., Therapeutic Jurisprudence, [in:] Filozoficzne i teoretyczne zagadnienia demokratycznego państwa prawa, eds. M. Andruszkiewicz, A. Breczko, S. Oliwniak, Białystok 2015.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/sil.2026.35.2.243-258
Date of publication: 2026-08-07 12:31:28
Date of submission: 2023-10-14 16:10:22


Statistics


Total abstract view - 0
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF - 0

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2026 Adam Zienkiewicz

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.