The Impact of International Law on International Criminal Proceedings – Human Rights Perspective

Edyta Lis

Abstract


A long time ago, the international community has taken some steps to prosecute war criminals and to establish a permanent criminal tribunal. However, a new era in the development of international criminal law and procedure, as well as international human rights and humanitarian law, began in the aftermath of World War II. Unfortunately, the Nuremberg and Tokyo Tribunals focused mainly on the accused and their punishment. They ignored the role of the victim in the criminal proceedings. Thus, it was necessary to create a new international criminal tribunal that would not suffer from the shortcomings and would be in line with the emerging standards for the protection of human rights. Indeed, the Statutes and Rules of Procedure and Evidence of the International Criminal Tribunals for the former Yugoslavia (ICTY) and for Rwanda (ICTR) was an attempt to be more fair and reflect international human rights standards. The milestone, however, was the establishment of the International Criminal Court (ICC), whose Statute mirror not only fundamental human rights standards and jurisprudence of human rights tribunals and organs but also elevates the status of victims. Furthermore, the ICC applies treaties and other sources of international law and it “must be consistent with internationally recognized human rights”. The article is a contribution to the discussion of the impact of international law on the development of international criminal proceedings through the lens of human rights standards. It also attempts to show whether the special features of international law have influenced international criminal proceedings and demonstrate the close but complex relationship between sub-branches of international law, such as international criminal law, international criminal procedure, international human rights and humanitarian law, as well as the ways of interferences of international human rights law in international criminal proceedings.


Keywords


accused; human rights; international criminal procedure; victim; witness

Full Text:

PDF

References


LITERATURE

Antonowicz L., Rzecz o państwach i prawie międzynarodowym, Lublin 2012.

Assy R., Injustice in Person: The Right to Self-Representation, Oxford 2015, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199687442.001.0001.

Bachrach M., The Protection and Rights of Victims under International Criminal Law, “International Lawyer” 2000, vol. 34(1).

Bassiouni C.M., Chronology of Efforts to Establish an International Criminal Court, “Revue internationale de droit pénal” 2015, vol. 86(3–4), DOI: https://doi.org/10.3917/ridp.863.1163.

Boas G., The Milošević Trial Lessons for the Conduct of Complex International Criminal Proceedings, Cambridge 2007, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511619090.

Boas G., Bischoff J.L., Reid N.L., Taylor III B.D., International Criminal Procedure: International Criminal Law Practitioner Library, vol. 3, Cambridge 2011, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511760563.

Boister N., Cryer R., The Tokyo International Military Tribunal – A Reappraisal, Oxford 2008, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199278527.001.0001.

Brouwer A.M. de, Heikkilä M., Victim Issues: Participation, Protection, Reparation, and Assistance, [in:] International Criminal Procedure: Principles and Rules, eds. G. Sluiter, H. Friman, S. Linton, S. Vasiliev, S. Zappalà, Oxford 2013.

Burra S., Is International Criminal Justice in the Pursuit of Human Rights?, [in:] Human Rights and International Criminal Law, eds. B. Uddin Khan, M.J.H, Bhuiyan, Leiden–Boston 2022, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004447462_003.

Cassese A., International Criminal Law, Oxford 2003.

Cline C., Trial Without Undue Delay: A Promise Unfulfilled in International Criminal Courts, “Revista Brasileira de Políticas Públicas” 2018, vol. 8(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.5102/rbpp.v8i1.5159.

Clooney A., Webb P., The Right to a Fair Trial in International Law, Oxford 2021, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780198808398.001.0001.

Colangelo A.J., Procedural Jus Cogens, “Columbia Journal of Transnational Law” 2021, vol. 60(2).

Croquet N.A.J., The International Criminal Court and the Treatment of Defence Rights: A Mirror of the European Court of Human Rights’ Jurisprudence?, “Human Rights Law Review” 2011, vol. 11(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/hrlr/ngq056.

Cryer R., Friman H., Robinson D., Wilmshurst E., An Introduction to International Criminal Law and Procedure, Cambridge 2010, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511760808.

Daminova N., The European Court of Human Rights on the ‘Access to a Lawyer’ Directive 2013/48/EU: The Quest for a Coherent Application of the Right to a Legal Assistance in Europe?, “European Criminal Law Review” 2021, vol. 11(2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/2193-5505-2021-2-211.

Dias T., Beyond Imperfect Justice: Legality and Fair Labelling in International Criminal Law, Leiden–Boston 2022, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004510951.

Dimitrijević V., The Human Right to Remain Silent, [in:] International Law: New Actors, New Concepts – Continuing Dilemmas: Liber Amicorum Božidar Bakotić, eds. B. Vukas, T. Šošić, Leiden–Boston 2010, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004181823.i-614.121.

Dutton A., Ní Aoláin F., Between Reparations and Repair: Assessing the Work of the ICC Trust Fund for Victims Under Its Assistance Mandate, “Chicago Journal of International Law” 2019, vol. 19(2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3254972.

Fanego C.A., Requirements in Relation to the Right to a Defence: The Right to Defend Oneself, to Legal Assistance and Legal Aid (Art. 6.3.C ECHR), [in:] Europe of Rights: A Compendium on the European Convention of Human Rights, eds. J.G. Roca, P. Santolaya, Leiden–Boston 2012, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004219915_014.

Farell B., The Right to a Speedy Trial before International Criminal Tribunals, “South African Journal on Human Rights” 2003, vol. 19(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/19962126.2003.11865174.

Fedorova M., The Principle of Equality of Arms in International Criminal Proceedings, [in:] Defense Perspectives on International Criminal Justice, eds. C. Rohan, G. Zyberi, Cambridge 2017, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781316091623.009.

Galand A.S., The Systemic Effect of International Human Rights Law on International Criminal Law, [in:] Human Rights Norms in ‘Other’ International Courts, ed. M. Scheinin, Cambridge 2019, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108584623.004.

Gallant K.S., The Role and Powers of Defense Counsel in the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, “International Lawyer (ABA)” 2000, vol. 34(1).

Garkawe S., The Role and Rights of Victims at the Nuremberg International Military Tribunal, [in:] The Nuremberg Trials: International Criminal Law Since 1945. 60th Anniversary International Conference, eds. H.R. Reginbogin, C. Safferling, München 2006, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/9783110944846.86.

Gasser H.P., The Changing Relationship between International Criminal Law, Human Rights Law and Humanitarian Law, [in:] The Legal Regime of the International Criminal Court: Essays in Honour of Professor Igor Blishchenko, eds. J. Doria, H.P. Gasser, M.C. Bassiouni, Leiden–Boston 2009, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004163089.i-1122.312.

Harhoff F., One Size Fits All? A Looming Look at Human Rights in International Criminal Legal Proceedings, [in:] International Law and the Protection of Humanity: Essays in Honor of Flavia Lattanzi, eds. P. Acconci, D. Donat Cattin, A. Marchesi, G. Palmisano, V. Santori, Leiden–Boston 2016, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004269507_025.

Hennebel L., Tigroudja H., The American Convention on Human Rights: A Commentary, Oxford 2022.

Henzelin M., Rordorf H., When Does the Length of Criminal Proceedings Become Unreasonable According to the European Court of Human Rights, “New Journal of European Criminal Law” 2014, vol. 5(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/203228441400500105.

Jegede S., The Right to a Fair Trial in International Criminal Law, [in:] Protecting Humanity: Essays in International Law and Policy in Honour of Navanethem Pillay, ed. C. Eboe-Osuji, Leiden–Boston 2010, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/ej.9789004183780.i-882.115.

Keïta X.J., Disclosure of Evidence in the Law and Practice of the ICC, “International Criminal Law Review” 2016, vol. 16(6), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/15718123-01606007.

Knoops G.J., An Introduction to the Law of International Criminal Tribunals: A Comparative Study, Leiden–Boston 2014, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789047429012.

Kozłowski A., Wpływ sądownictwa międzynarodowego na rozwój prawa międzynarodowego, [in:] Współczesne sądownictwo międzynarodowe. Wybrane zagadnienia prawne, ed. J. Kolasa, vol. 2, Wrocław 2010.

Krzan B., Admissibility of Evidence and International Criminal Justice, “Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal” 2021, vol. 7(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v7i1.492.

Krzan B., Human Rights and International Criminal Law, [in:] Prosecuting International Crimes: A Multidisciplinary Approach, ed. B. Krzan, Leiden–Boston 2016, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004323667.

Lysaght C., Publicity of Court Proceedings, “Irish Jurist” 2003, vol. 38.

McDermott Y., Fairness in International Criminal Trials, Oxford 2016, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780198739814.001.0001.

McGonigle Leyh B., Understanding Limitations: Victim Participation and the International Criminal Court, [in:] Victimological Approaches to International Crimes: Africa, eds. R. Letschert, R. Haveman, A.M. de Brouwer, A. Pemberton, Cambridge–Antwerp–Portland 2011.

Meron T., Judicial Independence and Impartiality in International Criminal Tribunals, “American Journal of International Law” 2005, vol. 99(2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1562502.

Mosna A., Some Thoughts on the Nature and Limits of the Right to Appeal in Front of the ICC, “Kritische Vierteljahresschrift für Gesetzgebung und Rechtswissenschaft” 2017, vol. 100(3), DOI: https://doi.org/10.5771/2193-7869-2017-3-265.

Mouthaan S., The Modalities of Victim Participation, [in:] Victim Advocacy before the International Criminal Court, eds. E. King, R. Letschert, S. Garkawe, E. Pobjie, Cham 2022, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-56733-0_1.

Perelló Doménech I., The Right to Be Informed of the Charge (Article 6.3 A) ECHR, [in:] Europe of Rights: A Compendium on the European Convention of Human Rights, eds. J.G. Roca, P. Santolaya, Leiden–Boston 2012, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004219915_016.

Sakowicz A., Standard of the Protection of the Right to Silence Applicable to Persons Examined as Witnesses in the Light of the European Court of Human Rights Case Law, “Ius Novum” 2018, vol. 12(2).

Scalia D., Human Rights in the Context of International Criminal Law: Respecting Them and Ensuring Respect for Them, [in:] Research Handbook on Human Rights and Humanitarian Law, eds. R. Kolb, G. Gaggioli, Cheltenham–Northampton 2013, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781781006078.00038.

Scalia D., Use of Human Rights in International Criminal Law: Influence or Appearances of Legitimacy?, [in:] Convergences and Divergences between International Human Rights, International Humanitarian and International Criminal Law, eds. P. De Hert, S. Smis, M. Holvoet, Cambridge–Antwerp–Portland 2018.

Schabas W.A., An Introduction to the International Criminal Court, Cambridge 2020, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781108616157.

Schabas W.A., Relationships between International Criminal Law and Other Branches of International Law, “Recueil des Cours” 2021, vol. 417.

Schabas W.A., The European Convention on Human Rights: A Commentary, Oxford 2015, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/law/9780199594061.001.0001.

Schabas W.A., The International Criminal Court: A Commentary on the Rome Statute, Oxford 2016.

Schmid E., Drif H., International Criminal Law and Human Rights, [in:] Elgar Encyclopedia of Human Rights, eds. C. Binder, M. Nowak, J.A. Hofbauer, P. Janig, Cheltenham 2022, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781789903621.international.criminal.law.hr.

Sinars T.A., The Accused’s Right to a Public Trial, “Notre Dame Law Review” 1967, vol. 42(4).

Sluiter G., The Law of International Criminal Procedure and Domestic War Crimes Trials, “International Criminal Law Review” 2006, vol. 6(4), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/157181206778992250.

Sluiter G., Friman H., Linton S., Vasiliev S., Zappalà S., Introduction, [in:] International Criminal Procedure: Principles and Rules, eds. G. Sluiter, H. Friman, S. Linton, S. Vasiliev, S. Zappalà, Oxford 2013.

Tladi D. (ed.), Peremptory Norms of General International Law (Jus Cogens): Disquisitions and Disputations, Leiden–Boston 2021.

Trechsel S., Human Rights in Criminal Proceedings, Oxford 2006, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199271207.001.0001.

Tochilovsky V., The Law and Jurisprudence of the International Criminal Tribunals and Courts: Procedure, Evidence and Human Rights Aspects, The Hague 2022.

Tuinstra J.T., Defending the Defenders: The Role of Defence Counsel in International Criminal Trials, “Journal of International Criminal Justice” 2010, vol. 8(2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqp085.

Vanderpuye K., Traditions in Conflict: The Internationalization of Confrontation, “Cornell International Law Journal” 2010, vol. 43(3).

Veas J.E., A Comparative Analysis of the Case Law of the European Court of Human Rights on the Right against Self-Incrimination, “Revista Brasileira de Direito Processual Penal” 2022, vol. 8(2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.22197/rbdpp.v8i2.675.

Villiger M.E., Handbook on the European Convention on Human Rights, Leiden–Boston 2023, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1163/9789004443839.

Zappalà S., Human Rights in International Criminal Proceedings, Oxford 2003, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199258918.001.0001.

Zappalá S., The Rights of Victims v. the Rights of the Accused, “Journal of International Criminal Justice” 2010, vol. 8(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqq001.

Zwanenburg M., The Van Boven/Bassiouni Principles: An Appraisal, “Netherlands Quarterly of Human Rights” 2006, vol. 24(4), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/016934410602400405.

ONLINE SOURCES

Doswald-Beck L., Fair Trial, Right to, International Protection, “Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law”, April 2013, https://opil-ouplaw-com.peacepalace.idm.oclc.org/display/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e798?rskey=rSj6qn&result=1&prd=MPIL (access: 16.12.2024).

European Committee on Crime Problems, New Recommendation on Rights, Services and Support for Victims of Crime, 16.3.2023, https://www.coe.int/en/web/cdpc/-/new-recommendation-on-rights-services-and-support-for-victims-of-crime (access: 16.12.2024).

European Court of Human Rights, Guide on Article 6: Right to a fair trial (criminal limb), https://rm.coe.int/1680304c4e (access: 16.12.2024).

Gasser H.P., Humanitarian Law, International, “Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law”, December 2015, https://opil-ouplaw-com.peacepalace.idm.oclc.org/display/10.10/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e488?rskey=TW4e7p&result=1&prd=MPIL (access: 16.12.2024).

Kolb R., Kilibarda P., Human Rights and Humanitarian Law, “Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law”, December 2022, https://opil-ouplaw-com.peacepalace.idm.oclc.org/display/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e811?rskey=J61tYq&result=1&prd=MPIL (access: 16.12.2024).

Kreß C., International Criminal Law, “Max Planck Encyclopedia of Public International Law”, March 2009, https://opil-ouplaw-com.peacepalace.idm.oclc.org/display/10.1093/law:epil/9780199231690/law-9780199231690-e1423?rskey=qOvCjH&result=1&prd=MPIL (access: 16.12.2024).

The Trust Fund for Victims, https://www.trustfundforvictims.org (access: 16.12.2024).

United Nations, Justice Served: Lebanon’s Special Tribunal Closes, 31.12.2023, https://news.un.org/en/story/2023/12/1145217 (access: 16.12.2024).

REPORTS AND COMMENTS

Explanatory Report to the European Convention on the Compensation of Victims of Violent Crimes, Strasbourg, 24 November 1983, ETS no. 116.

Fifth report on peremptory norms of general international law (jus cogens) by Dire Tladi, Special Rapporteur, International Law Commission Seventy-third session Geneva, 18 April – 3 June and 4 July – 5 August 2022, A/CN.4/747, 24 January 2022.

General Comment No. 32, Article 14: Right to equality before courts and tribunals and to a fair trial, CCPR/C/GC/32, 23 August 2007.

Report of the Secretary-General pursuant to paragraph 2 of Security Council Resolution 808 (1993), S/25704, 3 May 1993.

LEGAL ACTS

African Charter on Human and Peoples’ Rights, adopted on 1 June 1981.

Arab Charter on Human Rights, translated from Arabic version provided by the League of Arab States, Tunis, 22 May 2004, [ST/HR/]CHR/NONE/2004/40/Rev.1.

Basic Principles and Guidelines on the Right to a Remedy and Reparation for Victims of Gross Violations of International Human Rights Law and Serious Violations of International Humanitarian Law, adopted by General Assembly resolution 60/147, A/RES/60/147, 21 March 2006.

Basic Principles on the Independence of the Judiciary, adopted on 6 September 1985, the 7th United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders held at Milan from 26 August to 6 September 1985.

Basic Principles on the Role of Lawyers, adopted on 7 September 1990 by the 8th United Nations Congress on the Prevention of Crime and the Treatment of Offenders, Havana, Cuba.

Body of Principles for the Protection of All Persons under Any Form of Detention or Imprisonment, adopted on 9 December 1988 by General Assembly resolution 43/173.

Convention on the Rights of the Child, adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 20 November 1989, UNTS 1990, vol. 1577, no. 27531.

Declaration of Basic Principles of Justice for Victims of Crime and Abuse of Power, adopted on 29 November 1985 by General Assembly resolution 40/34, A/RES/40/34.

Directive 2004/80/EC of 29 April 2004 relating to compensation to crime victims (OJ EU L 261/15, 6.8.2004).

Directive 2012/29/EU of the European Parliament and of the Council of 25 October 2012 establishing minimum standards on the rights, support and protection of victims of crime, and replacing Council Framework Decision 2001/220/JHA (OJ EU L 315/57, 14.11.2012).

Directive (EU) 2016/343 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 9 March 2016 on the strengthening of certain aspects of the presumption of innocence and of the right to be present at the trial in criminal proceedings (OJ EU L 65/1, 11.3.2016).

ECCC, Internal Rules (Rev.10) as revised on 27 October 2022.

European Convention on the Compensation of Victims of Violent Crimes, Strasbourg, 24 November 1983, ETS no. 116.

Guidelines on Justice in Matters involving Child Victims and Witnesses of Crime, ECOSOC Resolution 2005/20, E/RES/2005/20, 16 December 2005.

ICTR, Rules of Procedure and Evidence, adopted on 29 June 1995, as amended on 13 May 2015.

ICTY, Rules of Procedure and Evidence, IT/32/Rev.50, 8 July 2015.

International Convention on the Protection of the Rights of All Migrant Workers and Members of their Families, New York, 18 December 1990, UNTS vol. 2220, no. 39481.

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 19 December 1966, Optional Protocol to the above-mentioned Covenant, adopted by the General Assembly of the United Nations on 19 December 1966, UNTS 1976, vol. 999, no. 14668.

Recommendation CM/Rec(2022)9 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on the protection of witnesses and collaborators of justice, adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 30 March 2022 at the 1430th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies.

Recommendation CM/Rec(2023)2 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on rights, services and support for victims of crime, adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 15 March 2023 at the 1460th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies.

Recommendation No. R(85) 11 to the Member States on the position of the victim in the framework of criminal law and procedure, adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 28 June 1985 at the 387th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies.

Recommendation Rec(2005)9 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on the protection of witnesses and collaborators in justice, adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 20 April 2005 at the 924th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies.

Recommendation Rec(2006)8 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on assistance to crime victims, adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 14 June 2006 at the 967th meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies.

Resolution 808 (1993) adopted by the Security Council at its 3175th meeting on 22 February 1993, S/RES/808.

Resolution 827 (1993) adopted by the Security Council at its 3217th meeting on 25 May 1993, S/RES/827.

Resolution 955 (1994) adopted by the Security Council at its 3453rd meeting on 8 November 1994, S/RES/955.

Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, Rome, 17 July 1998, UNTS, vol. 2187, no. 38544.

Rules of Procedure and Evidence, Official Records of the Assembly of States Parties to the Rome Statute of the International Criminal Court, First session, New York, 3–10 September 2002 (ICC-ASP/1/3 and Corr.1), part II.A, with amendments.

Statute of the Special Tribunal for Lebanon, attachment to UNSC Res. 1757 (2007), S/RES/1757 (2007), 30 May 2007.

Statute of the Special Tribunal for Sierra Leone, 16 January 2002.

STL, Rules of Procedure and Evidence, amended on 10 April 2019, STL-BD-2009-01-Rev.10.

STSL, Rules of Procedure and Evidence, adopted on 16 January 2002 (ICTR Rules, applicable mutatis mutandis), as amended on 31 May 2012.

Universal Declaration of Human Rights, A/RES/217 A (III), 10 December 1948.

CASE LAW

Decision of the ICTR of 22 June 2001 in case no. ICTR-97-21-T, Prosecutor v. Nyiramasuhuko, Decision on Ntahobali’s Motion for Withdrawal of Counsel.

Decision of the ICTY of 30 September 2003 in case no. IT-02-54-AR 73.4, Prosecutor v. Slobodan Milošević, Separate Opinion of Judge Mohammed Shahabuddeen appended to the Appeals Chamber Decision on Admissibility of Evidence-in-Chief in the form of Written Statements.

Decision of the ICTY of 22 September 2004 in case no. IT-02-54 T, Prosecutor v. Slobodan Milošević, Reasons for decision on assignment of defence counsel.

Decision of the SCSL of June 2004 in case no. SCSL-04-14-T, Prosecutor v. Sam Hinga Norman, Moinina Fofana, Allieu Kondewa, Decision on the Application of Sam Hinga Norman for Self-Representation under Article 17 (4) (d) of the Statute of the Special Court.

ICC of 16 November 2020 in case no. ICC-01/09-01/15, Case Prosecutor v. Paul Gicheru and Philip Kipkoech Bett, Prosecution’s written submissions concerning self-representation, severance of the charges, registration and disclosure of evidence, and other procedural matters pertaining to pre-confirmation proceedings.

Judgment of the ECtHR of 29 April 1988, Belilos v. Switzerland, application no. 10328/83.

Judgment of the ECtHR of 27 October 1993, Dombo Beheer BV v. the Netherlands, application no. 14448/88.

Judgment of the ICTY of 21 July 2000 in case no. IT-95-17/1-A, Prosecutor v. Anto Furundžija.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/sil.2024.33.5.197-222
Date of publication: 2024-12-31 10:51:54
Date of submission: 2024-03-19 19:48:38


Statistics


Total abstract view - 86
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF - 0

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Edyta Lis

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.