New Area of Judicial Cooperation on Criminal Matters in the European Union: The Transmission of Electronic Evidence between Member States
Abstract
The digitalisation of justice aims to facilitate access to justice, improve overall efficiency and ensure the resilience of justice systems in times of crises, such as the COVID-19 pandemic. Regarding criminal proceedings, the need for digitalisation is made even clearer by the modernization of crime, its partial digitalisation and its cross-border nature. It also follows from the international nature of the digitalisation challenges that the need to meet them cannot be reduced to the level of national law enforcement but is also reflected in the framework of criminal cooperation between the Member States of the European Union. In this context, a new challenge for the digitalisation of justice is the exchange of electronic evidence. The European Union has adopted a Regulation on European Production Orders and European Preservation Orders aimed on the exchange electronic evidence between Member States. This Regulation shall be applied from 18 August 2026. The Regulation prescribes that written communication between competent authorities and designated establishments or legal representatives shall be carried out through a secure and reliable decentralised IT system. However, the Regulation does not regulate execution issues related to the transmission of electronic evidence. Thus, there is a risk that the service providers will carry out official requests through insecure communication channels, even though the European Union already has platforms that are suitable for the transfer of evidence. The aim of this paper is to present the specifics of the legal and technical platforms already used by the European Union in this field and to be introduced in the future. The article also examines the relevant legal background related to the operation of these platforms.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
LITERATURE
Aksamitovska K., Digital Evidence in Domestic Core International Crimes Prosecutions, “Journal of International Criminal Justice” 2021, vol. 19(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/jicj/mqab035.
Bartkó R., Elektronikus kapcsolattartás a büntetőeljárásban, [in:] Az elektronikus eljárások joga, ed. G. Karácsony, Budapest 2018.
Bommarito M.J., Preprocessing Data, [in:] Legal Informatics, eds. D.M. Katz, R. Dolin, M.J. Bommarito, Cambridge 2021.
Brodowski D., Die Digitalisierung der strafjustiziellen Zusammenarbeit in der EU, “Zeitschrift für die gesamte Strafrechtswissenschaft” 2023, vol. 135(3), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/zstw-2023-0026.
Carboni N., Velicogna M., Electronic Data Exchange within European Justice: e-Codex Challenges, Threats and Opportunities, “International Journal for Court Administration” 2012, vol. 4(3).
Dymitruk M., Legal Tech in the Law Enforcement Agencies, [in:] Legal Tech: Information Technology Tools in the Administration of Justice, eds. D. Szostek, M. Zalucki, Baden-Baden 2022.
Elek B., Költség és időtartalékok a büntetőeljárásban, “Büntetőjogi Szemle” 2015, no. 1–2.
Herke Cs., A digitalizáció szerepe a büntetőeljárásban, [in:] A bűnügyi tudományok és az informatika, ed. K. Mezei, Budapest–Pécs 2019.
Karsai K., Locus/Forum Regit Actum – a Dual Principle in Transnational Criminal Matters, “Hungarian Journal of Legal Studies” 2019, vol. 60(2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1556/2052.2019.00010.
Kery-Tyerman J., Shankar A.J., The Core Concepts of E-Discovery, [in:] Legal Informatics, eds. D.M. Katz, R. Dolin, M.J. Bommarito, Cambridge 2021.
Laurintsen M., Document Automation, [in:] Legal Informatics, eds. D.M. Katz, R. Dolin, M.J. Bommarito, Cambridge 2021.
Ontanu E.A., The Digitalisation of European Union Procedures: A New Impetus Following a Time of Prolonged Crisis, “Law, Technology and Humans” 2023, vol. 5(1).
Popescu E.F., Complementary Cybersecurity, “International Journal of Information Security and Cybercrime” 2020, vol. 9(2).
Smith J.D.G., Moses L.B., Chan J., The Challenges of Doing Criminology in the Big Data Era: Towards a Digital and Data-Driven Approach, “The British Journal of Criminology” 2017, vol. 57(2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/bjc/azw096.
Tosza S., All Evidence Is Equal, but Electronic Evidence Is More Equal Than Any Other: The Relationship between the European Investigation Order and the European Production Order, “New Journal of European Criminal Law” 2020, vol. 11(2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/2032284420919802.
ONLINE SOURCES
European Commission, Legislative Train 02.2024 – A New Push for European Democracy: Digitalisation of Judicial Cooperation, https://www.europarl.europa.eu/legislative-train/carriage/digitalisation-of-judicial-cooperation/report?sid=7801 (access: 11.12.2024).
European Commission, New European Interoperability Framework: Promoting Seamless Services and Data Flows for European Public Administrations, 2017, https://ec.europa.eu/isa2/sites/default/files/eif_brochure_final.pdf (access: 11.12.2024).
REPORTS
European Commission: Directorate-General for Justice and Consumers, Cross-Border Digital Criminal Justice – Final Report, 2020, https://data.europa.eu/doi/10.2838/118529 (access: 11.12.2024).
European Union Agency for Criminal Justice Cooperation, Digital Criminal Justice, https://www.eurojust.europa.eu/judicial-cooperation/instruments/digital-criminal-justice (access: 11.12.2024).
LEGAL ACTS
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: European Interoperability Framework – Implementation Strategy, Brussels, 23.3.2017, COM(2017) 134 final.
Communication from the Commission to the European Parliament, the Council, the European Economic and Social Committee and the Committee of the Regions: Digitalisation of justice in the European Union – A toolbox of opportunities, Brussels, 2.12.2020, COM/2020/710 final.
Council Decision 2005/671/JHA of 20 September 2005 on the exchange of information and cooperation concerning terrorist offences (OJ EU L 253/22, 29.9.2005).
Directive (EU) 2023/1544 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2023 laying down harmonised rules on the designation of designated establishments and the appointment of legal representatives for the purpose of gathering electronic evidence in criminal proceedings (OJ EU L 191/181, 28.7.2023).
Regulation (EU) No. 910/2014 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 23 July 2014 on electronic identification and trust services for electronic transactions in the internal market and repealing Directive 1999/93/EC (OJ EU L 257/73, 28.8.2014).
Regulation (EU) 2022/850 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 30 May 2022 on a computerised system for the cross-border electronic exchange of data in the area of judicial cooperation in civil and criminal matters (e-CODEX system), and amending Regulation (EU) 2018/1726 (OJ EU L 150/1, 1.6.2022).
Regulation (EU) 2023/969 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 10 May 2023 establishing a collaboration platform to support the functioning of joint investigation teams and amending Regulation (EU) 2018/1726 (OJ EU L 132/1, 17.5.2023).
Regulation (EU) 2023/1543 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 12 July 2023 on European Production Orders and European Preservation Orders for electronic evidence in criminal proceedings and for the execution of custodial sentences following criminal proceedings (OJ EU L 191/118, 28.7.2023).
Regulation (EU) 2023/2844 of the European Parliament and of the Council of 13 December 2023 on the digitalisation of judicial cooperation and access to justice in cross-border civil, commercial and criminal matters, and amending certain acts in the field of judicial cooperation (OJ EU L 2023/2844, 27.12.2023).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/sil.2024.33.5.69-85
Date of publication: 2024-12-31 10:51:42
Date of submission: 2024-03-21 11:59:32
Statistics
Indicators
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Andor Gál
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.