Gloss to the Judgement of the Supreme Administrative Court of 8 May 2018 (II OSK 1926/17)

Anna Ostrowska, Jakub Polanowski

Abstract


By the judgement of 8 May 2018 (II OSK 1926/17), the Supreme Administrative Court dismissed the cassation appeal of the Lublin Provincial Heritage Conservation Officer against the judgement of the Voivodeship Administrative Court in Lublin of 6 April 2017 (II SA/Lu 1119/16), in which the Court found ineffective inclusion of a real estate monument record card (the area of the former Jewish cemetery in Biłgoraj at Maria Konopnicka Street) in the provincial record of historical monuments. The Supreme Administrative Court stressed that although the judgement under appeal was incorrectly reasoned, it was in accordance with the law since there were grounds for declaring the contested act ineffective. The aforementioned judgement deserves attention due to the fact that it expresses the position that it is impossible to apply the general principles of the Code of Administrative Procedure in the proceedings conducted by the provincial heritage conservation officer concerning the inclusion of the record card of a historical monument in the provincial record of monuments. The purpose of the gloss is to refer to this view.


Keywords


real estate monument; provincial record of historical monuments; provincial heritage conservation officer; record card of the historical monument; Code of Administrative Procedure; general principles of administrative procedure; principle of trust

References


Act of 14 June 1960 – Code of Administrative Procedure (Journal of Laws 2018, item 2096 as amended).

Act of 7 July 1994 – Construction Law (Journal of Laws 2019, item 1186).

Act of 23 July 2003 on the Protection and Care of Historical Monuments (Journal of Laws 2018, item 2067 as amended).

Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 20 March 1952 (Journal of Laws 1995, No. 36, item 175 as amended).

Decision of the Supreme Administrative Court of 13 June 2018, II OSK 2781/17, LEX No. 2536740.

Dziedziak W., O prawie słusznym (perspektywa prawa stanowionego), Lublin 2015.

Dziedziak W., Some Remarks on Good Law and Good Administration, [in:] Discretionary Power of Public Administration. Its Scope and Control, eds. L. Leszczyński, A. Szot, Frankfurt am Main 2017.

Gomułowicz A., Sędzia sądu administracyjnego a idea autorytetu, [in:] Aspekt prawotwórczy sądownictwa administracyjnego, Warszawa 2008.

Judgement of the Supreme Administrative Court of 4 June 1982, I SA 258/82, ONSA 1982, No. 1, item 54.

Judgement of the Supreme Administrative Court of 21 January 2015, II OSK 2189/13, LEX No. 1753478.

Judgement of the Supreme Administrative Court of 18 August 2016, II OSK 2909/14, LEX No. 2142398.

Judgement of the Supreme Administrative Court of 9 November 2016, II OSK 254/15, LEX No. 2199312.

Judgement of the Supreme Administrative Court of 18 April 2018, II OSK 1446/16, LEX No. 2494134.

Judgement of the Voivodeship Administrative Court in Gdańsk of 1 October 2014, II SA/Gd 396/14, LEX No. 1534126.

Judgement of the Voivodeship Administrative Court in Szczecin of 31 May 2017, II SA/Sz 158/17, LEX No. 2314427.

Judgement of the Voivodeship Administrative Court in Kraków of 8 February 2018, II SA/Kr 1570/17, CBOSA.

Piątek W., Zasady ogólne Kodeksu postępowania administracyjnego jako podstawa skargi kasacyjnej w postępowaniu sądowoadministracyjnym, [in:] Kodyfikacja postępowania administracyjnego na 50-lecie K.P.A., red. J. Niczyporuk, Lublin 2010.

Regulation of the Minister of Culture and National Heritage of 26 May 2011 on keeping the register of historical monuments, the national, provincial and communal record of historical monuments and the national register of historical monuments stolen or exported abroad illegally (Journal of Laws No. 113, item 661).

Wyrzykowski M., Ziółkowski M., Konstytucyjne zasady prawa i ich znaczenie dla interpretacji zasad ogólnych prawa i postępowania administracyjnego, [in:] System Prawa Administracyjnego, t. 2: Konstytucyjne podstawy funkcjonowania administracji publicznej, red. R. Hauser, Z. Niewiadomski, A. Wróbel, Warszawa 2012.

Zdyb M., Konstytucyjne podstawy administracyjnoprawnych ograniczeń prawa własności jako podstawowego prawa rzeczowego (i ograniczonych praw rzeczowych), [in:] System Prawa Administracyjnego, t. 7: Prawo administracyjne materialne, red. R. Hauser, A. Wróbel, Z. Niewiadomski, Warszawa 2017.

Zimmermann J., Aksjomaty postępowania administracyjnego, Warszawa 2017.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/sil.2019.28.2.193-203
Data publikacji: 2019-12-02 17:43:02
Data złożenia artykułu: 2019-09-05 11:09:32


Statistics

Total abstract view - 300
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF - 0 PDF (Język Polski) - 0

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2019 Anna Ostrowska, Jakub Polanowski

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.