Hide
Show all
Email this article Lawyers’ Personality and Its Implications for Conflict Resolution and Mediation: Empirical Research of the MBTI Inventory Test among Law Students
Abstract
The paper examines the personality type predispositions of law students, as indicated by the MBTI test results. Discussion reflects on their potential implications for practice of law when it comes to conflict resolution strategies, including the use of mediation. Drawing on American studies, the authors refer to the compatibility hypothesis, which states that personality type is correlated with occupational preferences, and attempt to test thesefindings in the Polish context. On the basis of empirical data concerning law students at the University of Warsaw, as well as results coming from other research, they discuss whether certain personality types are particularly predestinating for undertaking law studies and whether this differs in different countries, taking also into account the gender dimension. The discussion further reflects on how lawyers’ personality type may impact their approach to conflict and conflict resolution strategies. The analysis also refers to implications of personality types on practice of law, where lawyers can be either in the role of mediator or represent the parties. In this respect the paper links theory, research and practice in the field of dispute resolution and handling conflict.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
LITERATURE
Baker R.L., Using Insights about Perception and Judgment from the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Instrument as an Aid to Mediation, “Harvard Negotiation Law Review” 2014, vol. 9.
Briggs Myers I., Wprowadzenie do typu, Oxford 2009.
Briggs Myers I., McCaulley M.H., Quenk N.L., Hammer A.L., MBTI Manual: A Guide to the Development and Use of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, Mountain View 2003.
Carskadon T.G., Test-Retest Reliabilities of Continuous Scores on the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, “Psychological Reports” 1977, vol. 41(3), DOI: https://doi.org/10.2466/pr0.1977.41.3.1011.
Cybulko A., Gmurzyńska E., Winiarska A., Preferowane podejścia do rozwiązywania konfliktów wśród polskich i amerykańskich studentów prawa w kontekście systemu kształcenia, “Studia Iuridica” 2018, vol. 78, DOI: https://doi.org/10.5604/01.3001.0013.2139.
Daicoff S., Expanding the Lawyer’s Toolkit of Skills and Competences: Synthesizing Leadership, Professionalism, Emotional Intelligence, Conflict Resolution and Comprehensive Law, “Santa Clara Law Review” 2012, vol. 52(3).
Daicoff S., Lawyer, Know Thyself: A Review of Empirical Research on Attorney Attributes Bearing on Professionalization, “American University Law Review” 1997, vol. 46(5).
Daicoff S., Making Law Therapeutic for Lawyers: Therapeutic Jurisprudence, Preventive Law and the Psychology of Lawyers, “Psychology, Public Policy and Law” 1999, vol. 5(4), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/1076-8971.5.4.811.
Gmurzyńska E., Rola prawników w alternatywnych metodach rozwiązywania sporów, Warszawa 2014.
Guthrie C., The Lawyer’s Philosophical Map and the Disputant’s Perceptual Map: Impediments to Facilitative Mediation and Lawyering, “Harvard Negotiation Law Review” 2001, vol. 6.
Hirsch S., Kummerow J., Introduction to Type in Organizations, Palo Alto 1989.
Kalinowska-Nawrotek B., Dyskryminacja kobiet na polskim rynku pracy, Poznań 2005.
Kay K., Shipman C., The Confidence Code: The Science and Art of Self-Assurance – What Women Should Know, New York 2015.
Kilmann R.H., Thomas K.W., Developing a Forced-Choice Measure of Conflict-Handling Behavior: The “Mode” Instrument, “Educational and Psychological Measurement” 1977, vol. 37(2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/001316447703700204.
Korneeva Y., Shahova L., Kripchenko N., Mediators’ Professional Competence and Personal Qualities in Conducting Conciliation Processes with Varying Degrees of Success, “SA Journal of Industrial Psychology” 2022, vol. 48, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4102/sajip.v48i0.1870.
Korobkin R., Guthrie C., Psychology, Economics and Settlement: A New Look at the Role of Lawyers, “Texas Law Review” 1997, vol. 76.
Lisle Baker R., Using Insights About Perception and Judgment from the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator Instrument as an Aid to Mediation, “Harvard Negotiation Law Review” 2004, vol. 9.
Łojko E., Opinie studentów prawa o wydziale i jego kadrze, [in:] Studenci prawa o studiach i perspektywach zawodowych, ed. E. Łojko, Warszawa 2011.
Malherbe K., Promoting Self-Awareness and Conflict Management Skills in a Multicultural Setting, “African Journal of Health Professions Education” 2023, vol. 15(2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.7196/AJHPE.2023.v15i2.1641.
Mayer J.D., Salovey P., Caruso D.R., Emotional Intelligence: New Ability or Eclectic Traits?, “American Psychologist” 2008, vol. 63(6), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0003-066X.63.6.503.
McCrae R.R., Costa Jr. P.T., Reinterpreting the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator from the Perspective of the Five-Factor Model of Personality, “Journal of Personality” 1989, vol. 57(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1989.tb00759.x.
Peters D., Forever Jung: Psychological Type Theory, the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator and Learning Negotiation, “Drake Law Review” 1993, vol. 42(1).
Peters D., Peters M.M., Maybe That’s Why I Do That: Psychological Type Theory, the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, and Learning Legal Interviewing, “NYLS Law Review” 1990, vol. 35(1).
Peters M.M., Peters D., Juris Types Learning Law Through Self-Understanding, Gainesville 2007.
Pittenger D.J., The Utility of the Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, “Review of Educational Research” 1993, vol. 63(4), DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/1170497.
Power S.J., Lundsten L.L., Studies That Compare Type Theory and left-Brain/Right-Brain Theory, “Journal of Psychological Type” 1997, vol. 43.
Randall V.R., The Myers-Briggs Type Indicator, First Year Law Students and Performance, “Cumberland Law Review” 1995, vol. 26(63).
Richard L., Psychological Type and Job Satisfaction among Practicing Lawyers in the United States, “Capital University Law Review” 2001, vol. 29.
Riskin L., Mediation and Lawyers, “Ohio State Law Journal” 1982, vol. 43.
Sandberg S., Lean In: Women, Work and the Will to Lead, New York 2016.
Stein R., Swan A.B., Evaluating the Validity of Myers‐Briggs Type Indicator Theory: A Teaching Tool and Window into Intuitive Psychology, “Social and Personality Psychology Compass” 2019, vol. 13(2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/spc3.12434.
Thomson R.S., What Type of Lawyer Are You? ISTJ? ESTJ? INTJ? ENTP?, Chicago 1999.
Tobacyk J., Cieslicka A., Compatibility Between Psychological Type and Academic Major in Polish University Students, “Journal of Psychological Type” 2000, vol. 54.
Tobacyk J., Cyrson E., Tobacyk Z., Cross-National Evidence for Compatibility of Psychological Type in Polish and American Samples, “Journal of Career Assessment” 2000, vol. 8(2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/106907270000800207.
Zhong B., Yan J., Sun H., Chen H., Tao B., Jiang Y., Chen H., Lu T., Ding Z., Relationship between Personality Portraits of University Students and Interpersonal Conflict Resolution Strategies: A Latent Profile Analysis, “Scientific Reports” 2024, vol. 14, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1038/s41598-024-83491-4.
ONLINE SOURCES
Mohr T.S., Why Women Don’t Apply for Jobs Unless They’re 100% Qualified, 25.8.2014, https://hbr.org/2014/08/why-women-dont-apply-for-jobs-unless-theyre-100-qualified (access: 23.8.2025).
Richard L., Herding Cats: The Lawyer Personality Revealed, 2002, https://www.managingpartnerforum.org/tasks/sites/mpf/assets/image/MPF%20-%20Herding%20Cats%20-%20Richard%20-%203-5-121.pdf (access: 23.8.2025).
Richard L., The Lawyers Types: How Your Personality Affects Your Practice, “ABA Journal” 1993, https://www.lawyerbrain.com/wp-content/uploads/2023/04/the_lawyer_types_mbti.pdf (access: 23.8.2025).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/sil.2025.34.2.133-159
Date of publication: 2025-09-25 23:21:22
Date of submission: 2023-09-05 00:56:52
Statistics
Indicators
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Anna Cybulko, Ewa Gmurzyńska, Aleksandra Winiarska
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.