Ukryj
Pokaż wszystkie
Wyślij tekst przez e-mail Konstytucjonalizm planetarny. Utopia konstytucyjna dla pokryzysowego, potransformacyjnego i postapokaliptycznego świata
Streszczenie w języku polskim
W artykule przedstawiono zarys teorii konstytucjonalizmu planetarnego. Konstytucjonalizm planetarny jest pomyślany jako alternatywa dla „ciemnego” konstytucjonalizmu, stanowiącego formę rządów opartych na polityce strachu. Konstytucjonalizm planetarny, będąc obecnie utopią, jest konceptualizowany jako model konstytucyjny dla świata pokryzysowego, potransformacyjnego i postapokaliptycznego. To propozycja powszechnego, międzypokoleniowo sprawiedliwego i postantropocentrycznego społeczeństwa. Autor wyjaśnia pojęcia polikryzysu konstytucyjnego i politransformacji konstytucyjnej, a także rozmaite aspekty teorii konstytucjonalizmu planetarnego jako alternatywy dla konstytucjonalizmu globalnego, konstytucjonalizmu antropocentrycznego oraz hierarchicznego konstytucjonalizmu określonego terytorialnie.
Słowa kluczowe
Pełny tekst:
PDF (English)Bibliografia
LITERATURE
Adenitire J.O., Fasel R., Anthropocentric Constitutionalism, [in:] Animals and the Constitution: Towards Sentience-Based Constitutionalism, Oxford 2025.
Adenitire J.O., Fasel R., Sentience-Based Constitutionalism, [in:] Animals and the Constitution: Towards Sentience-Based Constitutionalism, Oxford 2025.
Albersmeier F., Speciesism and Speciescentrism, “Ethic Theory Moral Practice” 2021, vol. 24, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10677-021-10168-6.
Banach N., Stel M., Reducing Speciesism: An Intervention to Change People’s Attitudes and Behavioral Intentions, “Anthrozoös” 2024, vol. 37(5), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08927936.2024.2345472.
Belov M., Anxieties of Distrust and Uncertainty as Factors for Constitutional Polycrisis in Post-Modern Algorithmic Society, [in:] Algorithmic Transformation and Diffusion of Power: Trust, Conflict, Uncertainty and Control, eds. I. Spiecker gen Döhmann, C. Burchard, Baden-Baden 2025.
Belov M., Constitutional Consciousness: Finding a Black Cat in a Dark Room Through Semiotic Epistemology of Imprints in ‘Shadow Constitutionalisms’, [in:] Legal Consciousness, eds. J.v.H. Holtermann, M. Krešić, M. Novak, Cham 2025, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-87962-3_12.
Belov M., Constitutional Foundations of Peace and Discontent, [in:] Peace, Discontent and Constitutional Law: Challenges to Constitutional Order and Democracy, ed. M. Belov, London 2021, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003083894.
Belov M., Constitutional Nationalism and Constitutional Globalism on the Edge of Westphalian and Post-Westphalian Constitutionalism: The Bulgarian Case, [in:] Essays in Honour of Kostas G. Mavrias, ed. M.G. Kalyviōtou, vol. 1, Athens 2022.
Belov M., Constitutional Semiotics: The Conceptual Foundations of a Constitutional Theory and Meta-Theory, Oxford 2022.
Belov M., Constitutional Transitions and Transitional Imaginaries: Bridging Legacies of the Constitutional Past and Aspirations for the Constitutional Future, [in:] Constitutional Traditions and Constitutional Transitions: Legal and Socio-Legal Perspectives, eds. M. Belov, M. Florczak-Wątor, Cheltenham 2024, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4337/9781035345410.
Belov M., Global Rule of Law Instead of Global Democracy? Legitimacy of Global Judicial Empire on the Edge between Westphalian and Post-Westphalian Constitutionalism, [in:] The Role of Courts in Contemporary Legal Orders, ed. M. Belov, The Hague 2019.
Belov M., Humanism and Rationalism as Fundamental Normative Ideologies of Constitutionalism, [in:] Human Rights – 70 Years Since the Adoption of the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, eds. M. Novkirishka, M. Belov, D. Nachev, Sofia 2019.
Belov M., Implosion of Constitutional Order and Demise of Authority in Times of Constitutional Polycrisis, Emergency Constitutionalism and Constitutional Polytransition, [in:] Constitutional Polycrisis and Emergency Constitutionalism, ed. M. Belov, London 2025 (forthcoming).
Belov M., Judicial Dialogue – Westphalian or Post-Westphalian Constitutional Phenomenon?, [in:] Judicial Dialogue, ed. M. Belov, The Hague 2019.
Belov M., Post-human Constitutionalism? A Critical Defence of Anthropocentric and Humanist Traditions in Algorithmic Society, [in:] The IT Revolution and Its Impact on State, Constitutionalism and Public Law, ed. M. Belov, London 2021.
Belov M., Rule of Law and Democracy in Times of Transitory Constitutionalism, Constitutional Polycrisis and Emergency Constitutionalism: Towards a Global Algorithmic Technocracy?, [in:] Rule of Law in Crisis: Constitutionalism in a State of Flux, ed. M. Belov, London 2023, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003349501.
Belov M., Rule of Law in Europe in Times of Constitutional Polycrisis, Constitutional Polytransition and Democratic Discontent, “Diritto pubblico comparato ed europeo” 2023, vol. 3.
Belov M., Rule of Law in Space of Flows, [in:] Rule of Law at the Beginning of the Twenty-First Century, ed. M. Belov, The Hague 2018.
Belov M., Territory, Territoriality and Territorial Politics as Public Law Concepts, [in:] Territorial Politics and Secession: Constitutional and International Law Dimensions, ed. M. Belov, London 2021, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-64402-4.
Belov M., The Challenges to Westphalian Constitutional Geometry in the Age of Supranational Constitutionalism, Global Governance and Information Revolution, [in:] Global Constitutionalism and Its Challenges to Westphalian Constitutional Law, ed. M. Belov, London 2018.
Belov M., The Concept of Dark Constitutionalism, [in:] Legal Imaginaries of Crisis and Fear: Dark Constitutionalism, ed. M. Belov, London 2025 (forthcoming).
Belov M., The Conceptual Shapes of Constitutional Polycrisis: Deconstruction, Asymmetries and Post‑Modern Anxieties of Constitutional Normalcy, “Irish Jurist” 2023, vol. 70.
Belov M., The Constitutional Imaginaries of Crisis and Emergency: Between Battle of Narratives and Entanglement in Quantum Constitutionalism, [in:] Legal Imaginaries of Crisis and Fear: Dark Constitutionalism, ed. M. Belov, London 2025 (forthcoming).
Belov M., The Role of Fear Politics in Global Constitutional ‘Ernstfall’: Images of Fear under COVID-19 Health Paternalism, [in:] Populist Constitutionalism and Illiberal Democracies: Between Constitutional Imagination, Normative Entrenchment and Political Reality, ed. M. Belov, Cambridge 2021, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781839701399.
Belov M., Three Models for Ordering Constitutional Orders, “Pravni Zapisi” 2022, vol. 13(2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.5937/pravzap0-40290.
Belov M. (ed.), Constitutional Polycrisis and Emergency Constitutionalism, London 2025 (forthcoming).
Belov M. (ed.), Global Constitutionalism and Its Challenges to Westphalian Constitutional Law, London 2018.
Biswas Mellamphy N., Vangeest J., Human, All Too Human? Anthropocene Narratives, Posthumanisms, and the Problem of “Post-Anthropocentrism”, “The Anthropocene Review” 2024, vol. 11(3), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/20530196241237249.
Borràs S., New Transitions from Human Rights to the Environment to the Rights of Nature, “Transnational Environmental Law” 2016, vol. 5(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S204710251500028X.
Braidotti R., The Posthuman, Cambridge 2013.
Burdon P. (ed.), Exploring Wild Law: The Philosophy of Earth Jurisprudence, Adelaide 2011.
Cananea G. della, Is European Constitutionalism Really “Multilevel”, “Zeitschrift für ausländisches öffentliches Recht und Völkerrecht” 2010, vol. 70.
Cassese S., Advanced Introduction to Global Administrative Law, Cheltenham 2021.
Castells M., The Rise of the Network Society, Hoboken 2009, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781444319514.
Castoriadis C., The Imaginary Institution of Society, Cambridge 1987.
Celeste E., Digital Constitutionalism: Mapping the Constitutional Response to Digital Technology’s Challenges, “HIIG Discussion Paper Series” 2018, no. 2, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3219905.
Chiti E., Mattarella B.G. (eds.), Global Administrative Law and EU Administrative Law Relationships, Legal Issues and Comparison, Cham 2011, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-642-20264-3.
Corby P., An Innate Despair: The Philosophical Limitations of Transhumanism and Its Misplaced Hope in Human Enhancement, “The Linacre Quarterly” 2024, vol. 92(2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/00243639241281977.
Crouch C., Post-Democracy, Cambridge 2004.
De Gregorio G., Digital Constitutionalism in Europe, Cambridge 2024.
De Gregorio G., Digital Constitutionalism in Europe: Reframing Rights and Powers in the Algorithmic Society, Cambridge 2022, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/9781009071215.
Dobner P., Loughlin M. (eds.), The Twilight of Constitutionalism?, Oxford 2010, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199585007.001.0001.
Donaldson S., Kymlicka W., Zoopolis: A Political Theory of Animal Rights, Oxford 2013.
Faggin F., Irreducible: Consciousness, Life, Computers and Human Nature, London 2024.
Fasel R., Butler S., Animal Rights Law, Oxford 2023, DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509956135.
Golia A., Teubner G., Societal Constitutionalism: Background, Theory, Debates, “ICL Journal” 2021, vol. 15(4), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1515/icl-2021-0023.
Hallward P., General Wish or General Will? Political Possibility and Collective Capacity from Rousseau through Marx, [in:] Political Uses of Utopia: New Marxist, Anarchist and Radical Democratic Perspectives, eds. S. Chrostowska, J. Ingram, New York 2016, DOI: https://doi.org/10.7312/chro17958-006.
Hameroff S.R., Kaszniak A.W., Scott A.C. (eds.), Toward a Science of Consciousness: The First Tucson Discussions and Debates, Cambridge 1996, DOI: https://doi.org/10.7551/mitpress/6860.001.0001.
Herbrechter S., Posthumanism: A Critical Analysis, London 2013.
Jung C.G., Psychology of the Unconscious, Eastford 2016.
Keating A., Merenda K.C., Decentering the Human? Towards a Post Anthropocentric Standpoint Theory, “Praktika” 2013, vol. 4(10).
Kopnina H., Anthropocentrism and Post-Humanism, [in:] The International Encyclopedia of Anthropology, Hoboken 2018, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118924396.wbiea2387.
Kopnina H., Washington B., Taylor B., Piccolo J.J., Anthropocentrism: More than Just a Misunderstood Problem, “Journal of Agricultural and Environmental Ethics” 2018, vol. 31, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/s10806-018-9711-1.
Lacan J., Écrits, New York 2007.
Latour B., Politics of Nature: How to Bring the Sciences into Democracy, Cambridge 2004, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4159/9780674039964.
Lawrence P., Representation of Future Generations, [in:] Routledge Handbook of Global Sustainability Governance, eds. A. Kalfagianni, D. Fuchs, A. Hayden, New York 2019, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781315170237-8.
Lawrence P., Reder M., Representing Future Generations: Climate Change and the Global Legal Order, Cambridge 2025 (forthcoming).
Nayar P.K., Posthumanism, Cambridge 2014.
McGrath A., Rademaker L., Troy J. (eds.), Everywhen: Australia and the Language of Deep History, Randwick 2023.
Pelizzon A., Ricketts A., Beyond Anthropocentrism and Back Again: From Ontological to Normative Anthropocentrism, “Australasian Journal of Natural Resources Law and Policy” 2015, vol. 18(2).
Penrose R., Severino E., Scardigli F., Testoni I., Vitiello G., D’Ariano G.M., Faggin F. (eds.), Artificial Intelligence Versus Natural Intelligence, Cham 2022, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-030-85480-5.
Pernice I., Multilevel Constitutionalism and the Crisis of Democracy in Europe, “European Constitutional Law Review” 2015, vol. 11(3), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/S1574019615000279.
Peters A., Animals in International Law, Leiden 2023.
Peters A. (ed.), Studies in Global Animal Law, Cham 2020, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-662-60756-5.
Petersmann E.U., Multilevel Constitutionalism for Multilevel Governance of Public Goods, London 2017.
Poiares Maduro M., Contrapunctual Law: Europe’s Constitutional Pluralism in Action, [in:] Sovereignty in Transition, N. Walker, London 2003.
Poiares Maduro M., Three Claims of Constitutional Pluralism, [in:] Constitutional Pluralism in the European Union and Beyond, eds. M. Avbelj, J. Komarek, London 2012.
Pollicino O., Judicial Protection of Fundamental Rights on the Internet: A Road Towards Digital Constitutionalism?, Oxford 2021, DOI: https://doi.org/10.5040/9781509912728.
Přibáň J., Constitutional Imaginaries: A Theory of European Societal Constitutionalism, London 2020, DOI: https://doi.org/10.4324/9781003212270.
Rose M., Institutional Proxy Representatives of Future Generations: A Comparative Analysis of Types and Design Features, “Politics and Governance” 2024, vol. 12, DOI: https://doi.org/10.17645/pag.7745.
Schmitt C., The Concept of the Political, Chicago 2007, DOI: https://doi.org/10.7208/chicago/9780226738840.001.0001.
Sherwin R., Constitutional Over-Belief: Affective Intensity as a Function of Law’s Legitimation, [in:] Legal Imaginaries of Crisis and Fear: Dark Constitutionalism, ed. M. Belov, London 2025 (forthcoming).
Sorgner S.L., Hawkins S., On Transhumanism, Pennsylvania 2022.
Speed C., Anthropocentrism and Sustainable Development: Oxymoron or Symbiosis?, “WIT Transactions on Ecology and the Environment” 2006, vol. 93, DOI: https://doi.org/10.2495/SC060311.
Susen S., Reflections on the (Post-)Human Condition: Towards New Forms of Engagement with the World?, “Social Epistemology” 2021, vol. 36(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/02691728.2021.1893859.
Teubner G., Constitutional Fragments: Societal Constitutionalism and Globalization, Oxford 2012, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199644674.001.0001.
Teubner G., Societal Constitutionalism: Nine Variations on a Theme by David Sciulli, [in:] Sociological Constitutionalism, eds. P. Blokker, C. Thornhill, Cambridge 2017.
Tomlinson B., Torrance A.W., A Universal Declaration of AI Rights, 2024, DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.4879686.
Walker N., Taking Constitutionalism beyond the State, “Political Studies” 2008, vol. 56(3), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9248.2008.00749.x.
Weber M., Soziologie. Weltgeschichtliche Analysen. Politik, Berlin 1968.
Zwarthoed D., Political Representation of Future Generations, [in:] Towards the Ethics of a Green Future: The Theory and Practice of Human Rights for Future People, eds. M. Düwell, G. Bos, N. van Steenbergen, London 2018.
ONLINE SOURCES
Francis, Encyclical Letter Laudato Si’, https://www.vatican.va/content/francesco/en/encyclicals/documents/papa-francesco_20150524_enciclica-laudato-si.html (access: 15.8.2025).
Lorber F.E., Catalysts of Eco-Constitutional Evolution Peru’s Landmark Ruling Bridges the Gap Between Anthropocentrism and Ecocentrism, 10.4.2024, https://verfassungsblog.de/catalysts-of-eco-constitutional-evolution (access: 15.8.2025).
Nahm M., The Arcane Nexus: Assessing the Roots of Non-Local Consciousness, 2025, https://www.researchgate.net/publication/387998127_The_Arcane_Nexus_Assessing_the_Roots_of_Non-Local_Consciousness (access: 15.8.2025).
Tomlinson B., Torrance A.W., A Universal Declaration of AI Rights, 2024, https://ssrn.com/abstract=4879686 (access: 15.8.2025).
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/sil.2025.34.2.11-34
Data publikacji: 2025-09-25 23:21:07
Data złożenia artykułu: 2025-08-05 16:54:36
Statystyki
Wskaźniki
Odwołania zewnętrzne
- Brak odwołań zewnętrznych
Prawa autorskie (c) 2025 Martin Belov
Powyższa praca jest udostępniana na lcencji Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.