Diversity of macrophytes in riverine aquatic habitats: comparing active river channel and its cut-offs

Adam Paweł Kubiak, Rafał Krawczyk

Abstract


The study area was a small lowland river valley (the Łęg river) located in the south-east of Poland. The object of investigation was the macrophytes of 10 river lakes with corresponding active river channel stretches of the same length as the cut-offs. The aim was to check the difference in species diversity between cut-off and active river channels. The second aim was to test the following hypothesis: vegetation of river lake has been shaped under the influence of contiguous river stretch which has left a measurable mark in species abundance and composition. To test this, we checked whether a cut-off channel’s flora is more similar to flora of the contiguous river stretch, than to flora of a farther river stretch. During the course of the study it was found that the average species richness was approximately two times higher in the cut-off channels than in the river stretches. The number of the species exclusive for the river lakes was nine times higher in comparison with the river’s exclusives (not found in the cut-offs). The Shannon diversity index definitely spoke in favor of the river lakes. These results clearly show the significance of river lakes in maintaining biodiversity of aquatic ecosystems in a small river valley. We did not confirm our hypothesis concerning floristic relation between an active channel and its cut-offs. The floristic similarity between a given cut-off channel and the contiguous active river channel stretch is not stronger than the similarity between this lake and more distant river stretches. The cause of such a state of affairs may be high natural dynamics of investigated habitats and anthropogenic transformation of the river valley.

Full Text:

PDF

References


Bornette G., Amoros C., Lamouroux N. 1998. Aquatic plant diversity in riverine wetlands: the role of connectivity. Freshwater Biology 39(2): 267–283

Bornette G., Amoros C., Piegay H., Tachet J., Hein T. 1998. Ecological complexity of wetlands within a river landscape. Biological Conservation 85: 35–45.

Bornette G., Piegay H., Citterio A., Amoros C., Godreau V. 2001. Aquatic plant diversity in four river floodplains: a comparison at two hierarchical levels. Biodiversity and Conservation 10: 1683–1701.

Braun-Blanquet J. 1964. Pflanzensoziologie, Grundzüge der Vegetationskunde (3-rd edition). Springer Verlag, Vienna.

Bunn S.E., Arthington A.H. 2002. Basic principles and ecological consequences of altered flow regimes for aquatic biodiversity. Environmental Management 30(4): 492–507.

Connell J. H. 1978. Diversity in tropical rain forests and coral reefs. Science 199: 1302–1310.

Cristofor S., Vadineanu A., Sarbu A., Postolache C., Dobre R., Adamescu M. 2003. Long-term changes of submerged macrophytes in the Lower Danube Wetland System. Hydrobiologia 506– 509: 625–634.

Dzwonko Z. 2008. Przewodnik do badań fitosocjologicznych. Vademecum Geobotanicum. Sorus, Poznań-Kraków.

Fijałkowski D. 1966. Zbiorowiska roślinne lewobrzeżnej doliny Bugu w granicach województwa Lubelskiego. Annales Univ. M. Curie-Skłodowska, sec. C, 21: 247–312.

Franklin P., Dunbar M., Whitehead P. 2008. Flow controls on lowland river macrophytes: A review. Science of the Total Environment 400: 369–378.

Głowaciński Z., Michalik S. 1979. Kotlina Sandomierska. Wiedza Powszechna, Warszawa.

Kondracki J. 2002. Geografia regionalna Polski. PWN, Warszawa.

Krawczyk R. 2010. Species richness and vegetation structure in different morphogenetic types of river lakes in the San River valley. Annales Univ. M. Curie-Skłodowska, sec. C, 65(1): 29–45.

Leyer I. 2005. Predicting plant species’ responses to river regulation: the role of water level fluctuations. Journal of Applied Ecology 42: 239–250.

Lorens B. 2006. Szata roślinna jezior rzecznych oraz ich różnorodność fitocenotyczna i gatunkowa. [In:] W. Wojciechowska (ed.). Jeziora rzeczne doliny środkowego Bugu. Różnorodność biologiczna i krajobrazowa. Wyd. KUL.

Macicka-Pawlik T., Wilczyńska W. 1996. Zbiorowiska roślinne starorzeczy w dolinie środkowego biegu Odry. Acta Univ. Wratisl. 64: 73–120.

Matuszkiewicz W. 2008. Przewodnik do oznaczania zbiorowisk roślinnych Polski. PWN, Warszawa.

Michalska-Hejduk D., Kopeć D., Drobniewska A., Sumorok B. 2009. Comparison of physical and chemical properties of water and floristic diversity of oxbow lakes under different levels of human pressure: A case study of the lower San River (Poland). Ecohydrology and Hydrobiology 9(2-4): 183-191.

Pielou E.C. 1969. An introduction to mathematical ecology. Wiley, New York.

Ratyńska H., Szwed W. 1999. Struktura roślinności starorzeczy jako wyraz dynamiki warunków siedliskowych. Przegląd Przyrodniczy 10(3–4): 33–48.

Shannon C.E., Weaver W. 1949. The mathematical theory of communication. University of Illinois Press, Urbana.

Thomaz S.M., Bini L.M., Bozelli R.L. 2007. Floods increase similarity among aquatic habitats in river-floodplain systems. Hydrobiologia 579: 1–13.

Urban D., Wójciak H. 2004. Water and rush plant associations of the Bug Valley old river-bed (Kryłów – Kodeń section) vis-à-vis the habitat conditions. Teka Komisji Ochrony i Kształtowania Środowiska Przyrodniczego 1: 293–300.

van der Maarel E. 1979. Transformation of cover-abundance values in phytosociology and its effects on community similarity. Vegetatio 39: 97–114.

Van Geest G.J., Coops H., Roijackers R.M.M., Buijse A.D., Scheffer M. 2005. Succession of aquatic vegetation driven by reduced water-level fluctuations in floodplain lakes. Journal of Applied Ecology 42: 251–260.

Van Geest G.J., Roozen F.C.J.M., Coops H., Roijackers R. M. M., Buijse A. D., Peeters E.T.H.M. Scheffer M. 2003. Vegetation abundance in lowland flood plain lakes determined by surface area, age and connectivity. Freshwater Biology 48(3): 440–454.

Ward J. V., Tockner K, Schiemer F. 1999. Biodiversity of floodplain river ecosystems: Ecotones and connectivity. Regulated Rivers 15: 125–139.

Wojtanowicz J. 1990. Podział fizycznogeograficzny Kotliny Sandomierskiej. Annales. Univ. M. Curie-Skłodowska, Sect. B, 44/45: 67-93.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/c.2014.69.1.49
Data publikacji: 2015-05-23 17:51:53
Data złożenia artykułu: 2015-05-09 16:10:19

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2015 Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska, sectio C – Biologia

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.