The Discriminatory Legalism Strategy and Hate Speech Cases in Poland. The Role of the Commissioner for Human Rights in Fighting Discrimination

Agnieszka Elżbieta Demczuk

Streszczenie w języku polskim

The regress of liberal democracy in the world has been progressing for years and the number of countries with the full democracy index is decreasing [Economist Intelligence Unit 2018, 2019; Freedom House 2018]. One of the serious threats to the rule of law and the human rights in modern democracy has become discriminatory legalism which is both strategy and weapon [Weyland 2013]. In order to weaken or marginalize the opposition and “rebellious” citizens, public authorities apply discriminatory legal instruments and democratic rules depending on who they are concerned with. Public authorities do this because of political views and use exclusion rhetoric, a language of hatred, stigmatizing all “strangers”, at last use hate speech on the Internet and beyond. The weaponization of hate speech is a convenient instrument for political struggle and the fight against inconvenient opponents. Hate speech is also used by far-right and nationalist organizations in the public sphere, which operate in an atmosphere of consent to their radical behaviour. Political hate speech plays an important role in the discriminatory legal strategy. Poland is included in the group of countries with flawed democracy (Article 7(1) TEU since 2017). The authorities introduced changes in law (which were defied as the “Frankensteinisation of legislation” by the Parliamentary Assembly of Council of Europe [PACE] in 2019), democratic institutions and the prosecution applies a discriminatory legalism strategy. This problem is highlighted by the current Commissioner for Human Rights which is an independent institution in the field of fighting hate speech (except a few independent media and NGOs informing about the hate speech phenomenon). Many of hate speech cases are discontinued or not taken up by the prosecution. The numbers of cases of hate speech and hate incidents are increasing but the Polish authorities use the underreporting mechanism. The Ombudsman warns that only 5% of cases are reported to the police. The language of hatred and contempt used by the authorities in Poland has become the weaponization in the fight against citizens as political opponents: LGBT+ community, refugees, political opponents, independent judges and others.

Słowa kluczowe

Poland, discriminatory legalism, populism, hate speech, Commissioner for Human Rights, rule of law

Pełny tekst:

PDF (English)


A Multi-Dimensional Approach to Disinformation. Report of the Independent High level Group on Fake News and Online Disinformation. 2018. The Digital Single Market, (access: 21.11.2020)

Applebaum, A. 2020. The Disturbing Campaign Against Poland’s Judges, "The Atlantic", (access: 14.03.2020).

Act of Civil Code of 23 April 1964 (Journal of Laws of 2019 items 1145, 1495).

Act of Criminal Code of 6 June 1997 (Journal of Laws of 2019 items 1950, 2128).

Act of the Commissioner for Human Rights of 15 July 1987 (Journal of Laws of 2014, item 1648).

Bay, S., Reynolds, A. 2018. The Black Market for Social Media Manipulation, NATO StratCom COE, Riga.

#BezpiecznySamorzad on Twitter. 2018, (access: 18.03.2020).

Bojarski, Ł. 2017. Country Report Non Discrimination. Poland. European Commission, (access: 21.11.2020).

Cambridge Dictionary, (access: 20.04.2020).

Cienski J. 2015. Migrants carry ‘parasites and protozoa’, warns Polish opposition leader, “Politico”, (access: 22.02.2020).

Commissioner’s Budget. 2020. The Commissioner for Human Rights (access: 17.03.2020).

Concluding observations on the combined twenty-second to twenty-fourth periodic reports of Poland (2019). Committee on the Elimination of Racial Discrimination (CERD), (access: 20.02.2020).

Constitution of the Republic of Poland of 2 of April 1997 (Journal of Laws of 2009 No. 114 item 1648).

Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedom of 4 November 1950. Journal of Laws of 1993 No. 61 item. 284.

Dziemidok-Olszewska, B., Sokół, W. 2012. Encyklopedia politologii, t. 2: Instytucje i systemy polityczne, Wolters Kluwer Polska.

Economic Intelligence Unit (EIU). 2020. Poland in Brief, (access: 18.03.2020).

European Commission for Democracy Through Law. Poland - Urgent Joint Opinion on the amendments to the Law on organisation on the Common Courts, the Law on the Supreme Court and other Laws, Opinion no. 977/2019, Venice Commission,〈=fr (access: 18.02.2020).

European Commission, Rule of Law Framework, (access: 18.02.2020).

European Democracy Index. 2019. A year of democratic setbacks and popular protest, The Economic Intelligence Unit, (access: 03.03.2020).

European Parliament resolution of 18 December 2019 on public discrimination and hate speech against LGBT+ people including LGBT free zones. 2019/2933 (RSP), European Parliament, (access: 21.02.2020).

Everything you need to know about the rule of law in Poland. 2016. Rule of Law, (access: 21.02.2020).

Freedeom House 2018. Freedom in the World 2018. Democracy in Crisis, (access: 20.02.2020).

Grabarczyk, J., Mazurkiewicz, M., Patrick, J. 2019. Dezinformacja i propaganda w polskim internecie w trakcie kampanii wyborczej 2019, Front Europejski, Warszawa, (access: 03.03.2020).

Guide on Article 17 of the European Convention on Human Rights. Prohibition of abuse of rights. 2019. The European Court of Human Rights (access: 25.04.2020).

Hate Crime Reporting. 2019, (access: 22.04.2020).

Human rights 2035: Five challenges and five signposts. Speech delivered by the Commissioner at the third National Congress on Human Rights. 2019. The Commissioner of Human Rights. (access:22.03.2020).

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights of 16 December 1966 (Journal of Laws of 1977. No. 38 item 167).

Lacey N. 2019. Populism and the Rule of Law, “Annual Review of Law and Social Science”, vol. 15, pp. 79–96, DOI:

LGBT-Free Zones Project, (access: 29.02.2020).

Loewenstein, K. 1937. Militant Democracy and Fundamental Rights, ”The American Political Science Review”, vol. 31(3), pp. 417–432, DOI:

Łaciak B., Segeš Frelak J. 2018. The Wages of Fear Attitudes Refugees and Migrants in Poland, Institutes of Public Affairs, European Programme, Warsaw European Commission (access: 03.03.2020).

Matczak M. 2019. Poland’s Rule of Law Crisis: Some Thoughts, "Hague Journal Rule of Law” vol. 11, DOI:

Mierzyńska A. 2020. Pełzające zło homoterroru. 12 miesięcy siania nienawiści do osób LGBT przez media publiczne, (access: 20.03.2020).

Mikulska-Jolles A. 2018. Migranci, uchodźcy i ksenofobia w kampanii wyborczej 2018 – raport z monitoringu, Helsińska Fundacja Praw Człowieka, Warszawa, (access: 22.02.2020).

Mikulska-Jolles A. 2020. Fake newsy i dezinformacja w kampaniach wyborczych w Polsce w 2019 r., Helsińska Fundacja Praw Człowieka, Warszawa, (access: 03.03.2020).

Müller, J.-W. 2016. What is Populism, University of Pennsylvania Press, Philadelphia.

New study reveals scale of underreporting of hate incidents in Poland. ODIHR Hate Crime Reporting 2019, OSCE (access: 20.03.2020).

Office for Foreigners. 2018 (access: 20.03.2020).

Pankowska M. 2019. Smear campaign coordinated by the Ministry of Justice, aimed to discredit Polish judges, discovered, (access: 22.02.2020).

Parliamentary Assembly of the Council of Europe. 2019. The functioning of democratic institutions in Poland, (access: 10.05.2020).

Public Opinion Research Centre. 2018. Stosunek Polaków i Czechów do przyjmowania uchodźców, no. 87, (access: 15.04.2020).

Recommendation No. R (97) 20 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on „Hate Speech” adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 30 October 1997. The Council of Europe, (access: 15.04.2020).

Sadurski, W. 2018. How Democracy Dies (in Poland): A Case Study of Anti-Constitutional Populist Backsliding, "Sydney Law School Research Paper” no. 18/01, DOI: (access: 20.04.2020).

The Open Republic, (access: 17.03.2020).

Timbro Authoritarian Populism Index 2019. Timbro (access: 20.04.2020).

Torre, de la C. 2017. Hugo Chávez and the diffusion of Bolivarianism, "Democratization”, vol. 24(7), pp. 1271–1288, DOI:

Tucker, J. A., Theocharis, Y., Roberts, M. E., Barberá, P. 2017. From liberation to turmoil: social media and democracy, "Journal of Democracy”, vol. 28, pp. 46–59.

Weyland, K. 2013. Latin America’s Authoritarian Drift: The Threat from the Populist Left, "Journal of Democracy” vol. 24(3), pp. 18–32.

Wigura, K., Bertram, Ł., Puchejda, A. 2017. The Negative Image of Muslims in the Polish Press. A Report by the Kultura Liberalna’s Public Debate Observatory, The Human Rights Commissioner, Warsaw, (access: 20.04.2020).

Winiewski, M., Hansen, K., Bilewicz, M. et al. 2016. Contempt Speech, Hate Speech. Report from Research on Verbal Violence Against Minority Groups. 2016, Stefan Batory Foundation, Warsaw, (access: 03.03.2020).

Woolley, S.C., Howard, P.N. 2019. Computational propaganda. Political Parties, Politicians, and Political Manipulation on Social Media, Oxford Scholarship Online, Oxford.

Data publikacji: 2021-01-26 15:37:25
Data złożenia artykułu: 2020-07-15 17:57:00


Widoczność abstraktów - 256
Pobrania artykułów (od 2020-06-17) - PDF (English) - 192


Odwołania zewnętrzne

  • Brak odwołań zewnętrznych

Prawa autorskie (c) 2021 Agnieszka Elżbieta Demczuk

Creative Commons License
Powyższa praca jest udostępniana na lcencji Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.