Strange Case of the Spin-off and the Classic: An Intertextual Analysis of Valerie Martin’s Mary Reilly

Julia Zygan

Abstract


This article aims to analyze Valerie Martin’s novel Mary Reilly (1990) in the context of intertextuality and claims that her work creates a dialogue with its pre-text. Before the analysis, this paper presents a short historical overview of intertextual theories, from the ancient ideas regarding this matter, through the theories that contributed to the coining of the term, to the three directions in which the notion of intertextuality developed – structuralist, poststructuralist, and socio-political. Martin’s text is analyzed in regard to Gerard Genette’s notion of transtextuality, concentrating mainly on one of its categories, hypertextuality; however, the study employs also the theory of spin-offs, arguing that Martin’s text very directly leads the reader towards its one intertextual source. Mary Reilly initiates a dialogue with its main pre-text, Robert Louis Stevenson’s novella Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde (1886) by redirecting the focus of the already familiar to the reader story and presenting aspects previously omitted in the classic. This text introduces a very specific dynamic between the figures of a father and a daughter. Their relationship is present on the level of the story, but also on the level of authorship, discussing the situation of a female writer. Moreover, this spin-off creates a space for once silenced characters, such as members of the working class, to be finally heard.


Keywords


Valerie Martin; intertextuality; spin-off; dialogue; contemporary fiction

Full Text:

PDF

References


Alfaro, María Jesús Martínez. 1996. “INTERTEXTUALITY: ORIGINS AND DEVELOPMENT OF THE CONCEPT.” Atlantis 18 (1/2): 268–285. http://www.jstor.org/stable/41054827.

Allen, Graham. 2006. Intertextuality. Routledge, London.

Bakhtin, Mikhail M. 1984. Problems of Dostoevsky’s Poetics, trans. and ed. C. Emerson. University of Minnesota Press, Minneapolis MN.

---. 1986. Speech Genres and Other Late Essays, trans. Vern W. McGee, ed. Caryl Emerson and Michael Holquist. University of Texas Press, Austin TX.

---. 1981. The Dialogic Imagination: four essays, trans. C. Emerson and M. Holquist, ed. M. Holquist. University of Texas Press, Austin TX.

Bakhtin, M. M. and Volosinov, V. N. 1986. Marxism and the Philosophy of Language, trans. L. Matejka and I. R. Titunik. Harvard University Press, Cambridge MA and London.

Barthes, Roland. 1977. Image-Music-Text, trans. Stephen Heath. Fontana Press, London.

---. 1986. “The Death of the Author.” The Rustle of Language, trans. by Richard Howard. Hill and Wang, New York.

Bloom, Harold. 1975. A Map of Misreading. Oxford University Press, Oxford.

---. 1975. Kabbalah and Criticism. Seabury Press, New York.

---. 1997. The Anxiety of Influence: A THEORY OF POETRY, SECOND EDITION. OXFORD UNIVERSITY PRESS, New York Oxford.

Eliot, T. S. 1982. “Tradition and the Individual Talent.” Perspecta 19: 36–42. https://www.jstor.org/stable/1567048.

Friedman, Susan Stanford. 1991. “Weavings: Intertextuality and the (Re)Birth of the Author.” Influence and Intertextuality in Literary History, ed. Jay Clayton and Eric Rothstein. University of Wisconsin Press, Wisconsin.

Genette, Gérard. 1982. Palimpsests: Literature in the Second Degree, trans. Channa Newman and Claude Doubinsky. University of Nebraska Press, Lincoln and London.

Gilbert, Sandra M. and Susan Gubar. 1979. The Madwoman in the Attic: the woman writer and the nineteenth-century literary imagination. Yale University Press, New Haven CT and London.

Graeber, Laurel. 1990. "Scenes Stevenson Never Imagined." The New York Times Book Review, February 4, 7.

Kristeva, Julia. 1980. Desire in Language: A Semiotic Approach to Literature and Art, ed. Leon S. Roudiez, trans. Thomas Gora, Alice Jardine and Leon S. Roudiez. Columbia University Press, New York.

Martin, Valerie. 1990. Mary Reilly. Vintage Books, New York.

Pfister, Manfred. 1991. “How Postmodern is intertextuality?” Research in Text Theory: Intertextuality, ed. Heinrich F. Plett. Walter de Gruyter, Berlin, New York.

Robinson, Lillian S. 1993. “Treason Our Text. Feminist Challenges to the Literary Canon.” Feminisms. An Anthology of Literary Theory and Criticism. ed. Robin Warhol and Diane Price. Rutgers University Press, New Brunswick.

Showalter, Elaine. 1990. ‘Feminism and literature’ in Literary Theory Today, ed. Peter Collier and Helga Geyer-Ryan. Polity Press, Oxford, 179–202.

Spengler, Birgit. 2015. Literary Spinoffs: Rewriting the Classics—Re-Imagining the Community. Campus Verlag GmbH, Frankfurt-on-Main.

Stevenson, Robert Louis. 1886. Strange Case of Dr Jekyll and Mr Hyde. LONGMANS, GREEN, AND CO., London.

Worton, Michael and Still, Judith. 1990. “Introduction.” Intertextuality: Theories and Practices, ed. Michael Worton and Judith Still. Manchester University Press, 1-44.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/nh.2023.8.105-118
Date of publication: 2023-12-23 00:15:58
Date of submission: 2022-12-31 18:17:48


Statistics


Total abstract view - 203
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF - 0

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Julia Zygan

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.