Westminster on the late Queen – metaphor as a discourse vehicle in condolence debates after Queen Elizabeth II’s death
Abstract
This paper investigates the patterns of discourse present in the record of condolence debates in Houses of the Parliament of the United Kingdom after the death of Queen Elizabeth II. Specifically, two research questions were examined. The study aims to prove specific patterns related to the expression of feelings caused by the Queen’s death, as well as those related to metaphors illustrating her. The study is conducted on the corpus of 249,882 tokens of written records of over 20 hours of speeches delivered in the British Parliament, subdivided into subcorpora for either House. The analysis employs the methodology of corpus-assisted discourse studies (CADS), based mostly on Baker (2023) and includes the tools of word frequency lists, collocation search, and concordances. The resulting concordance lines were interpreted using conceptual metaphor theory (Lakoff and Johnson 2011). The analysis proved that the discussion strategies of the speeches could be organised into three distinct categories. Across the lines of political divisions, the Queen was depicted as a figure to preserves the stability of the nation, an illustrious guide for all her subjects, particularly those in power, and finally a renowned example of Britain around the world and for all Britons. By employing those themes, the late Queen was presented as both a relatable figure and an extraordinary leader, evoking positive associations and setting her as an example to be follow both by the politicians and the electorate.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Abu-Humeid, Ahmed M. 2025. ‘Condolences on the Death of Queen Elizabeth II: Expressing Collective Identities and Ideological Stances’. Social Sciences & Humanities Open 11: 101584. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2025.101584.
Appleton, Stephen. 2021. ‘East, West and Westminster: A Corpus-Based Study of UK Foreign Policy Statements Regarding the Unification of Germany, October 1989 to November 1990’. Journal of Corpora and Discourse Studies 4 (0): 39. https://doi.org/10.18573/jcads.52.
Bachmann, Ingo. 2011. ‘Civil Partnership – “Gay Marriage in All but Name”: A Corpus-Driven Analysis of Discourses of Same-Sex Relationships in the UK Parliament’. Corpora 6 (1): 77–105. https://doi.org/10.3366/cor.2011.0005.
Baker, Paul. 2004. ‘“Unnatural Acts” Discourses of Homosexuality within the House of Lords Debates on Gay Male Law Reform.’ Journal of Sociolinguistics 8: 88–106.
Baker, Paul. 2023. Using Corpora in Discourse Analysis. 2nd edn. Bloomsbury Academic.
Bayley, Paul, and Cinzia Bevitori. 2009. ‘“Just War”, or Just “War”: Arguments for Doing the “Right Thing”’. In Corpus-Assisted Discourse Studies on the Iraq Conflict, edited by John Morley and Paul Bayley. Routledge Advances in Corpus Linguistics. Routledge.
Bogdanor, Vernon, ed. 2010. The Monarchy and the Constitution. Clarendon Press.
Brezina, Vaclav. 2018. Statistics in Corpus Linguistics: A Practical Guide. Cambridge University Press.
Brezina, Vaclav, Anthony McEnery, and Pierre Weill-Tessier. 2021. #LancsBox. V. 6.x. University of Lancaster, released. http://corpora.lancs.ac.uk/lancsbox/index.php.
Darwish, Ibrahim M., Abdulaziz A. Alzoubi, and Noora Q. Abu Ain. 2024. ‘The Death of Monarchs: Front-Page Reporting of Queen Elizabeth II’s Death’. Theory and Practice in Language Studies 14 (7): 2046–52. https://doi.org/10.17507/tpls.1407.11.
Findlay, Jamie Y. 2017. ‘Unnatural Acts Lead to Unconsummated Marriages: Discourses of Homosexuality within the House of Lords Debate on Same-Sex Marriage’. Journal of Language and Sexuality 6 (1): 30–60. https://doi.org/10.1075/jls.6.1.02fin.
House of Commons. 2022a. ‘Commons Chamber - Hansard - UK Parliament’. September 9. https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2022-09-09/debates/29a580ff-446a-45f1-a58b-c2711c8ca95a/CommonsChamber.
House of Commons. 2022b. ‘Commons Chamber - Hansard - UK Parliament’. September 10. https://hansard.parliament.uk/commons/2022-09-10/debates/1797fcfe-98b6-4dfa-9d6d-fcd668e54b9b/CommonsChamber.
House of Lords. 2022a. ‘Lords Chamber - Hansard - UK Parliament’. September 9. https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2022-09-09/debates/8ad40038-5ab6-4045-a188-b0aec2ec0207/LordsChamber.
House of Lords. 2022b. ‘Lords Chamber - Hansard - UK Parliament’.
September 10. https://hansard.parliament.uk/lords/2022-09-10/debates/8117eac0-65a4-4b41-804d-f6a1b4dd2c00/LordsChamber.
Kövecses, Zoltán. 2010. Metaphor: A Practical Introduction. 2nd ed. With Réka Benczes. Oxford University Press.
Lakoff, George, and Mark Johnson. 2011. Metaphors We Live By. 6. print. Univ. of Chicago Press.
Pérez, María Calzada. 2023. ‘The Representation of Migration in Parliamentary Settings: Critical Cross-Linguistics Corpus-Assisted Discourse Analyses’. Humanities and Social Sciences Communications 10: 1–12.
Riihimäki, Jenni. 2019. ‘At the Heart and in the Margins: Discursive Construction of British National Identity in Relation to the EU in British Parliamentary Debates from 1973 to 2015’. Discourse & Society 30: 412–31.
Slembrouck, Stef. 1992. ‘The Parliamentary Hansard “Verbatim” Report: The Written Construction of Spoken Discourse’. Language and Literature: International Journal of Stylistics 1 (2): 101–19. https://doi.org/10.1177/096394709200100202.
Sumiala, Johanna, Anu A Harju, and Julia Sonnevend. 2025. ‘Goodnight Ma’am The Queen’s Death as a Media Event and the Contestation of Legacies in Live Participation’. Media, Culture & Society 47 (4): 733–52. https://doi.org/10.1177/01634437241308751.
Tognini-Bonelli, Elena. 2001. Corpus Linguistics at Work. Vol. 6. Studies in Corpus Linguistics. John Benjamins Publishing Company. https://doi.org/10.1075/scl.6.
Willis, Rebecca. 2017. ‘Taming the Climate? Corpus Analysis of Politicians’ Speech on Climate Change’. Environmental Politics 26: 212–31.
Wodak, Ruth. 2015. ‘Critical Discourse Analysis, Discourse-Historical Approach’. In The International Encyclopedia of Language and Social Interaction, 1st edn, edited by Karen Tracy, Todd Sandel, and Cornelia Ilie. Wiley. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118611463.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/nh.2025.0.4-15
Date of publication: 2025-12-31 08:44:22
Date of submission: 2025-02-28 22:04:37
Statistics
Indicators
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Kamil Sikora

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.