Companion and the Borders of Power Dynamics in AI-Human Relationships

Ilias Ben Mna

Abstract


The 2025 film Companion presents viewers with a sci-fi vision in which the intricacies of romanticized relationships between humans and artificially intelligent companion robots are embedded in wider power struggles informed by gender, space, race, and class. The human main characters deny the protagonist Iris – a feminized companion – any ethical consideration or agency, which leads to a chain of events in which conceptual borders relating to identity, agency, heteronormativity, corporeality, and capitalist ownership are renegotiated. This article dissects the contours of these borders and their functioning within the film’s engagement with the epistemic and ontological thresholds that need to be navigated when humans and AI enter into symbiotic relationships. Special focus is given to relationality as well as cognitive and emotional feedback loops in which identities are forged in mutually reinforcing dynamics. Meaning-making processes are shown to be central for all characters involved, underlining how a “narrative conception of the self” overrides certain ontological conception of what or who appears real. The toxic masculinity displayed by Iris’ boyfriend offers entry points for an examination of gendered power structures in AI-human relationships. Naturalized borders surrounding sexual orientation and ethno-linguistic belonging are shown to be technological productions which AI can easily adjust to. The role of the AI developers in the story illustrates a socio-economic framework in which human and AI characters are agents within a larger power concentration and data collection regime cloaked in a language of neoliberal choice. The film thereby offers entry points in which contemporary power struggles pertaining to sexuality, gender, techno-capitalism, as well as emotional and relational ethics are negotiated in ways that de-center anthropocentric and hegemonic perspectives.


Keywords


artificial intelligence; relationships; borders; power dynamics, social control, incel; toxic masculinity; surveillance capitalism; corporeality

Full Text:

PDF

References


Ahnlund, Cecilia and Jacob Dillström, Fredrik Forsman, Theodor Gustavsson, Joel Holmberg, Simon Kedvall, Fred Aberg. 2024. “MILton: A Chatbot to Understand Incels.” Independent work: IT, Uppsala University. Accessed May 20, 2025: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1867729/FULLTEXT01.pdf.

Bardhan, Ashley. 2022. “Men Are Creating AI Girlfriends and Then Verbally Abusing Them.” Futurism, January 18, 2022. Accessed May 20, 2025: https://futurism.com/chatbot-abuse.

Bucksbaum, Sydney. 2025. “How Companion was almost an entirely different movie: 'What if the robot was the most human character?'” Article in Entertainment Weekly (January 30, 2025). Accessed May 31, 2025: https://ew.com/how-companion-was-almost-entirely-different-movie-jack-quaid-sophie-thatcher-drew-hancock-8782844.

Buick, Sara. 2024. “In Love With a Chatbot: Exploring Human-AI Relationships From a Fourth Wave HCI Perspective.” Independent thesis advanced level, Department for Informatics and Media, Uppsala University, Sweden. Accessed May 20, 2025: https://www.diva-portal.org/smash/get/diva2:1882677/FULLTEXT01.pdf.

Dalton, David S. and David Ramírez Plascencia. 2023. Imagining Latinidad: Digital Diasporas and Public Engagements Among Latin American Migrants. Leiden and Boston: Brill Pub.

Dorobantu, Marius. 2021. “Cognitive Vulnerability, Artificial Intelligence, and the Image of God.” in Humans, Journal of Disability & Religion, 25(1): 27-40, DOI: 10.1080/23312521.2020.1867025

Exford, Jazmine. 2024. “Racialized Sociolinguistic Processes in the Spanish Learning Journeys of Non-Latinxs in the U.S.” In Languages - Spanish in the US: A Sociolinguistic Approach 2024 9(6), MDPI. Accessed May 20, 2025: https://www.mdpi.com/2226-471X/9/6/192.

Fox, Nick J. 2024. “Artificial Intelligence and the Black Hole of Capitalism: A More-than-Human Political Ethology.” In Social Sciences 13: 507. https://doi.org/10.3390/socsci13100507.

Halberstam, Jack. 1991. “Automating Gender: Postmodern Feminism in the Age of the Intelligent Machine.” In Feminist Studies 17(3): 439-460.

Hayles, N. Katherine. 1999. How We Became Posthuman: Virtual Bodies in Cybernetics, Literature, and Informatics. Chicago: The University of Chicago Press.

Hayles, N. Katherine. 2023. “Technosymbiosis”. In Feminist AI, eds. Jude Browne, Stephen Cave, Eleanor Drage, and Kerry McInerney, 1-18, Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Herzfeld, Noreen. 2003. “Creating in Our Own Image: Artificial Intelligence and the Image of God.” In Zygon®: Journal of Religion and Science 37(2): 303-316.

Kupers, Terry. 2005. “Toxic Masculinity as a Barrier to Mental Health Treatment in Prison.” In Wiley Periodicals, Journal of Clinical Psychology, 61: 713– 724.

Liu, P.G., Zhao, J.J. and Zhang, Y.T. 2022. “Research on Symbolic Interaction in E-Commerce Live Streaming.” In Open Access Library Journal, 9: 1-12. doi: 10.4236/oalib.1109442.

Neri, Frida Cerna. 2022. “Artificial Intelligence or a Neoliberal Marketing Scheme? The Performative Nature of Lil Miquela’s Racialized Design and Politics on Instagram.” In The iJournal, 7(2): 52-59. DOI: https://doi.org/10.33137/ijournal.v7i2.38617.

Mundie, Craig and Eric Schmidt, Henry A. Kissinger. 2024. Genesis: Artificial Intelligence, Hope, and the Human Spirit. New York City: Little, Brown and Company.

Oravec, Jo Ann. 2023. “Technological Intimacies: Love for Robots, Smartphones, and Other Ai-Enhanced Entities.” In Peace Chronicle (Fall 2023). Accessed May 31, 2025: https://www.peacejusticestudies.org/wp-content/uploads/2023/09/Technological-Intimacies-Love-for-Robots-Smartphones-and-Other-AI-Enhanced-Entities.pdf.

Reilama, Mira. 2024. “Me, My AI Boyfriend, and I: An Ethnographic Study of Gendered Power Relations in Romantic Relationships Between Humans and AI Companions.” Master thesis, Central European University, Vienna. Accessed May 20, 2025: https://www.etd.ceu.edu/2024/reilama_mira.pdf.

Renzullo, Dalia. 2019. “Anthropomorphized AI as Capitalist Agents: The Price We Pay for Familiarity.” Montreal AI Ethics Institute. Accessed May 31, 2025: https://montrealethics.ai/wp-content/uploads/2019/10/Anthro_AI_DaliaRenzullo_ORIGINAL-converted.pdf.

Shaffer, Bryn. 2022. “’If you can’t tell, does it matter?’: Race, Gender, Sex and the Cybergaze of Westworld’s Gynoids.” Master thesis, Saint Mary’s University, Halifax, Nova Scotia. Access September 28, 2025: https://library2.smu.ca/xmlui/bitstream/handle/01/30938/Shaffer_Bryn_MASTERS_2022.pdf?sequence=1&isAllowed=y.

Talati, Dhruvitkumar. 2025. “Artificial Love: The Rise of AI in Human Relationships” In International Journal of Latest Technology in Engineering, Management & Applied Science, Volume 14(2): 293-301.

Turkle, Sherry. 2006. “A Nascent Robotics Culture: New Complicities for Companionship.” AAAI Technical Report Series, July 2006. Accessed May 31, 2025: https://bpb-us-e1.wpmucdn.com/sites.mit.edu/dist/0/833/files/2020/05/ST_Nascent-Robotics-Culture.pdf.

Turkle, Sherry. 2011. Alone Together – Why We Expect More From Technology And Less From Each Other. New York City: Basic Books.

Turkle, Sherry. 2015. Reclaiming Conversation – The Power of Talk in a Digital Age. New York City: Penguin Press.

Vallor, Shannon. 2024. The AI Mirror: How to Reclaim Our Humanity in an Age of Machine Thinking. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wu, Jie. 2024. “Social and ethical impact of emotional AI advancement: the rise of pseudo-intimacy relationships and challenges in human interactions.” In Frontiers in Psychology 15:1410462, doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2024.1410462 .




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/nh.2025.0.243-257
Date of publication: 2025-12-31 08:46:17
Date of submission: 2025-07-23 21:55:03


Statistics


Total abstract view - 6
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF - 0

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Ilias Ben Mna

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.