Sad and Rabid Puppies: Politicization of the Hugo Award Nomination Procedure

Anna Oleszczuk

Abstract


Originally a conservative genre, in the second half of the twentieth century, science fiction (sf) became a discourse whose progressive presentation of virtually all controversial political issues and critical questioning of the political status quo have remained unmatched in the so-called popular culture, among others. There is no other literary convention that so boldly challenges such issues as racism, sexism, social justice, and ecological devastation. However, the progressive stance of many science fiction writers, editors, and readers has been, in recent years, challenged by loose coalitions of groups calling themselves Sad Puppies and Rabid Puppies, who have acted against what they perceive as the repression of more traditional voices in science fiction communities. The paper will seek to explore recent political shifts within the science fiction fandom, with regard to oppression involving gender, class, race, and ethnicity. I will provide an account of the fandom’s political tensions, disentangle some of the convoluted discussions that have taken place across blogs, Twitter accounts, and Facebook pages of those involved in these debates, and specifically address the controversies related to the 2014 and 2015 Hugo Awards. I will also attempt to illuminate the violent conservative backlash that the aforementioned groups launched against the perceived political correctness and repression of certain viewpoints within sf communities.

 


Keywords


science fiction, popular culture, repression, fandoms, sf communities, Puppygate

Full Text:

PDF

References


Correia, Larry. 2014. “An Explanation about the Hugo Awards Controversy.” Monster Hunter Nation. Accessed March 31, 2017. http://monsterhunternation.com/2014/04/24/an-explanation-about-the-hugo-awards-controversy/.

Correia, Larry. 2013. “How to Get Correia Nominated for a Hugo PART 3: Won’t Somebody Please Think of the Children?” Monster Hunter Nation. Accessed March 31, 2017. https://larrycorreia.wordpress.com/2013/01/23/how-to-get-correia-nominated-for-a-hugo-part-3-wont-somebody-please-think-of-the-children/.

Correia, Larry. 2013. “The Sad Puppies Hugo Campaign… Sorta Successful for Everybody but Me.” Monster Hunter Nation. Accessed March 31, 2017. http://monsterhunternation.com/2013/04/01/the-sad-puppies-hugo-campaign-sorta-successful-for-everybody-butme/.

Day, Vox. 2015. “Vox Popoli: Do We Want to Reconcile?” Vox Popoli. Accessed March 31, 2017. http://voxday.blogspot.com/2015/12/do-we-want-to-reconcile.html?commentPage=2.

Day, Vox. 2015. “Vox Popoli: Rabid Puppies 2015.” Vox Popoli. Accessed March 31, 2017. http://voxday.blogspot.com/2015/02/rabid-puppies-2015.html.

Heer, Jeet. 2015. “2015 Hugo Awards and the History of Science Fiction Culture Wars.” Accessed March 31, 2017. https://newrepublic.com/article/121554/2015-hugo-awards-andhistory-science-fiction-culture-wars.

Kloos, Marko. 2015. “A Statement on My Hugo Nomination.” The Munchkin Wrangler. April 15, 2015. http://www.munchkinwrangler.com/2015/04/15/a-statement-on-my-hugo-nomination/.

Longhurst, Brian, Greg Smith, Gaynor Bagnall, Garry Crawford, and Miles Ogborn. 2016. Introducing Cultural Studies. Routledge.

Lord, Supreme Dark. Twitter Post. August 22, 2015. 11:01 PM. https://twitter.com/voxday/status/635386066812465153.

Maroney, Kevin J. 2017. “The New York Review of Science Fiction: On the Pleroma and a European Peninsula (Editorial, NYRSF 299).” Accessed March 31. http://www.nyrsf.com/2013/08/july-2013-editorial-on-the-pleroma-and-a-european-peninsula.html.

Martin, George R.R. 2015. “Blogging for Rockets.” Not A Blog, April 2015. http://grrm.livejournal.com/417812.html?thread=20658452.

Martin, George R.R. 2015. “Handicapping the Hugos, Part the Second.” Not A Blog, August 2015. http://grrm.livejournal.com/438310.html?thread=22322214.

Paulk, Kate. 2015. “Introducing Sad Puppies Four: The Bitches Are Back.” Accessed March 31, 2017. https://madgeniusclub.com/2015/09/03/introducing-sad-puppies-four-the-bitches-are-back/.

Rapoport, Michael. 2015. “No ‘Puppy’ Love at Science Fiction’s Hugo Awards.” The Wall Street Journal. August 23, 2015. http://blogs.wsj.com/speakeasy/2015/08/23/no-puppylove-at-science-fictions-hugo-awards/.

Slusser, George. 2008. “The Origins of Science Fiction.” In A Companion to Science Fiction, ed. David Seed, 27–42. John Wiley & Sons.

Torgersen, Brad. 2015. “Announcing SAD PUPPIES 3!” Accessed March 31, 2017. https://bradrtorgersen.wordpress.com/2015/01/07/announcing-sad-puppies-3/.

Torgersen, Brad R. 2015. “CHORF, It’s a Word Now.” Brad R. Torgersen, March 31, 2015. https://bradrtorgersen.wordpress.com/2015/03/31/chorf-its-a-word-now/.

Torgersen, Brad R. 2015. “Defenders of the Nail House.” Brad R. Torgersen, March 29, 2015. https://bradrtorgersen.wordpress.com/2015/03/29/nail-house/.

Torgersen, Brad R. 2015. “Sad Puppies and the Future.” Brad R. Torgersen, December 27, 2015. https://bradrtorgersen.wordpress.com/2015/12/27/sad-puppies-and-the-future/.

Torgersen, Brad R. 2015. “SAD PUPPIES: Some Responses to the Fallout.” Brad R. Torgersen, February 7, 2015. https://bradrtorgersen.wordpress.com/2015/02/07/sad-puppies-some-responses-to-the-fallout/.

Torgersen, Brad R. 2015. “The Peasant Revolt Will Be Televised.” Brad R. Torgersen, April 5, 2015. https://bradrtorgersen.wordpress.com/2015/04/05/peasants/.

Torgersen, Brad R. 2015. “Why SAD PUPPIES 3 Is Going to Destroy Science Fiction!” Brad R. Torgersen, January 16, 2015. https://bradrtorgersen.wordpress.com/2015/01/16/why-sadpuppies-3-is-going-to-destroy-science-fiction/.

Wallace, Amy. 2015. “Who Won Science Fiction’s Hugo Awards, and Why It Matters.” WIRED.

Accessed March 31, 2017. https://www.wired.com/2015/08/won-science-fictions-hugoawards-matters/.

Willis, Connie. 2015. “WHY I WON’T BE A PRESENTER AT THE HUGO AWARDS THIS YEAR.” The Connie Willis . Net Blog. Accessed March 31, 2017. http://azsf.net/cwblog/?p=116.

Wolmark, Jenny. 2008. “Time and Identity in Feminist Science Fiction.” In A Companion to Science Fiction. ed. David Seed, 156–170. John Wiley & Sons.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/nh.2017.2.127
Data publikacji: 2017-08-17 12:08:50
Data złożenia artykułu: 2017-08-17 11:59:01

Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Anna Oleszczuk

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.