Hide
Show all
Email this article Justice in Judicial Enforcement Law: Comments in the Context of the Decision-Making Model of the Law Application Process
Abstract
In the study, which is of a scientific and research nature, the following thesis is adopted: Justice is served in the process of law application but it materializes only at the moment of judgment execution. The article is aimed at answering the question about the understanding of justice in judicial enforcement proceedings (the last stage of the law application process). The subject has not been deeply discussed in the theory of law and, as a result, I believe it is essential to enquire whether the execution of judgment is still an element of justice, while it is a general truth that justice has already been served in the court (court judgment). The thesis presented is corroborated by the European Court of Human Rights decisions, as well as by the Polish Supreme Court case law. Similar conclusions find justification in the European acts of law. Debt repayment is not only a Polish problem, but a problem of many European countries. Certainly, in times of economic crisis and the worldwide problems of inflation, pandemic and wartime, it is more difficult to repay debts, but those simply do not disappear and enforcement is a solution reached for in search of justice.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
LITERATURE
Bogucki O., Sprawiedliwość wykładni prawa, “Acta Iuris Stetinensis” 2019, no. 2.
Dębiński R., Rzymskie prawo prywatne. Kompendium, Warszawa 2021.
Dziedziak W., An Essay on Natural and Distributive Justice, “Studia Iuridica Lublinensia” 2020, vol. 29(4), DOI: https://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2020.29.4.71-83.
Flaga-Gieruszyńska K., Szybkość, sprawność i efektywność postępowania cywilnego – zagadnienia podstawowe, “Zeszyty Naukowe KUL” 2017, vol. 60(3), DOI: https://doi.org/10.31743/zn.2017.60.3.5-20.
Helios J., Aksjologia procedur Unii Europejskiej – szkic problemu, “Acta Universitatis Wratislaviensis” 2015, no. 3661.
Kuryłowicz M., Aequitas i iustitia w rzymskiej praktyce prawnej, “Annales UMCS sectio G (Ius)” 2019, vol. 61(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.17951/g.2019.66.1.173-188.
Leszczyński L., Generalne klauzule odsyłające, Lublin 2023.
Leszczyński L., Klauzule generalne w stosowaniu prawa, Lublin 1986.
Leszczyński L., Kryteria pozaprawne w sądowej wykładni prawa, Warszawa 2022.
Leszczyński L., Model decyzyjny procesu stosowania prawa, [in:] A. Korybski, L. Leszczyński, Stanowienie i stosowanie prawa. Elementy teorii, Warszawa 2015.
Leszczyński L., Stosowanie generalnych klauzul odsyłających, Kraków 2001.
Leszczyński L., Types of Application of Law and Decision Making Model, “Studia Iuridica Lublinensia” 2015, vol. 24(2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2015.24.2.27.
Marciniak A., Sądowe postępowanie egzekucyjne, Warszawa 2013.
Maroń G., Formuły sprawiedliwości dystrybutywnej, “Resovia Sacra. Studia Teologiczno-Filozoficzne Diecezji Rzeszowskiej” 2010, vol. 17.
Maroń G., Sprawiedliwość według Roberta Nozicka w perspektywie libertarianizmu, “Resovia Sacra. Studia Teologiczno-Filozoficzne Diecezji Rzeszowskiej” 2007–2008, vol. 14–15.
Perelman C., O sprawiedliwości, Warszawa 1959.
Pietrzykowski H., [in:] Kodeks postępowania cywilnego. Komentarz, ed. T. Ereciński, Warszawa 2012.
Rawls J., Teoria sprawiedliwości, Warszawa 2013.
Stefaniuk M., Skuteczność prawa i jej granice, “Studia Iuridica Lublinensia” 2011, vol. 16.
Szymanek J., Rzetelny proces sądowy. Doktryna, prawo, praktyka, Warszawa 2021.
Szyszkowska M., Zarys filozofii prawa, Białystok 2000.
Tokarczyk R., Filozofia prawa w perspektywie prawa natury, Białystok 1996.
Tokarczyk R., Sprawiedliwość: próba syntetycznej systematyzacji zagadnień, “Gdańskie Studia Prawnicze” 2016, vol. 35.
Tokarczyk R., Sprawiedliwość jako naczelna wartość prawa, “Annales UMCS sectio G (Ius)” 1997, vol. 44.
Wiśniewski T., Reguły koncentracji materiału procesowego (pozew, odpowiedź na pozew, pisma przygotowawcze), [in:] System Prawa Handlowego, vol. 7: Postępowanie sądowe w sprawach cywilnych z udziałem przedsiębiorców, ed. T. Wiśniewski, Warszawa 2013.
Wróblewski J., Skuteczność prawa i problemy jej badania, “Studia Prawnicze” 1980, no. 1–2.
Wróblewski J., Zarys procesowego modelu sądowego stosowania prawa, [in:] Pisma wybrane, comp. M. Zirk-Sadowski, Warszawa 2015.
LEGAL ACTS
Act of 17 November 1964 – Civil Procedure Code (Journal of Laws 1964, no. 43, item 296).
Act of 7 September 2007 on assistance to people entitled to maintenance (Journal of Laws 2007, no. 192, item 1378, as amended).
Act of 28 February 2018 on enforcement costs (Journal of Laws 2018, item 770, as amended).
Act of 22 March 2018 on court bailiffs (Journal of Laws 2018, item 771, as amended).
European Commission for the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ), Good Practice Guide on Enforcement of Judicial Decisions adopted at the 26th CEPEJ Plenary Session, 10–11 December 2015, CEPEJ(2015)10.
European Commission on the Efficiency of Justice (CEPEJ), Guidelines for a Better Implementation of the Existing Council of Europe’s Recommendation on Enforcement adopted by the CEPEJ at its 14th plenary meeting (Strasbourg, 9–10 December 2009), CEPEJ(2009)11REV2.
European Convention for the Protection of Human Rights and Fundamental Freedoms of 4 November 1950 (Journal of Laws 1993, no. 61, item 284).
Recommendation Rec(2003)17 of the Committee of Ministers to Member States on enforcement (adopted by the Committee of Ministers on 9 September 2003 at the 851st meeting of the Ministers’ Deputies).
Regulation of the Minister of Justice of 18 December 2018 on the definition of detailed rules for management of office work, accounting and records of financial operations of bailiffs’ offices (Journal of Laws 2018, item 2517).
CASE LAW
Decision of the Supreme Court – the Civil Chamber of 28 July 2020, IV CO 55/20, Legalis no. 257649.
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 4 April 2001, K 11/00, Legalis no. 49672.
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 24 February 2003, K 28/02, Legalis no. 56404.
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 16 January 2006, SK 30/05, Journal of Laws 2006, no. 15, item 118.
Judgment of the Constitutional Court of 4 November 2010, K 19/06, Legalis no. 258407.
Judgment of the ECHR of 19 March 1997 in the case of Hornsby v. Greece, application no. 18357/91.
Judgment of the ECHR of 27 May 2003 in the case of Sanglier v. France, application no. 50342/99.
Judgment of the ECHR of 18 October 2010 in the case of Romańczyk v. France, application no. 7618/05.
Judgment of the ECHR of 27 May 2010 in the case of Papuc v. Romania, application no. 44476/04.
Resolution of the Supreme Court of 23 May 2012, III CZP 11/12, Legalis no. 468018.
Resolution of the Supreme Court of 7 October 2021, III CZP 52/20, Legalis no. 2613170.
Resolution of the Supreme Court of 27 January 2022, III CZP 36/22, Legalis no. 2669417.
Resolution of the Supreme Court of 26 April 2022, III CZP 91/22, Legalis no. 2688354.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/sil.2023.32.4.175-189
Date of publication: 2023-12-22 22:04:37
Date of submission: 2023-07-26 00:21:53
Statistics
Indicators
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Piotr Szczekocki
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.