On Justice in Judicial Application of Law

Wojciech Dziedziak

Abstract


The article addresses the issue of justice in the judicial application of law. The discussion is focused on justice understood in substantive terms. The traditional formula “to render to everyone his or her own” (suum cuique tribuere) was adopted, filled with the content of natural, innate rights of the human person. The study identifies difficult cases and particularly difficult cases (referred to as truly difficult cases) in the judicial application of law. Difficult cases are situations where the legal provisions (normative act) that are to be the basis for the decision are unjust, immoral, wrong. Various possibilities of reaching a fair decision in such situations are identified, based on “legal instruments”, and therefore within the legal framework, focusing on the validation decision (establishing the normative basis for the law applying decision) and on practical (operative) interpretation. Particularly difficult cases (matters) are situations where a legal regulation is manifestly unjust, and thus morally grossly defective, wrong, while the law (the legal system) lacks “instruments” that would give the possibility of making a just decision. The possibilities available in such extraordinary, particularly exceptional and difficult situations of making a just decision, but which are necessary for the sake of justice, have been pointed out. The question of truth has also been tackled. The judge/court administers justice based on the truth. Learning about what has occurred in reality and establishing the facts in accordance with reality is the starting point, the precondition and basis for a just decision, while the basic (main) purpose of court proceedings is a just decision, which requires, in difficult cases and particularly difficult cases, to include in the legal (juridical) basis of the decision the normative requirements of justice (carriers of a just decision), which value is commitment-generating, obligation-making, and which “demands” that “everyone be given his or her own”.


Keywords


justice; substantive justice; truth; difficult cases and particularly (i.e. truly) difficult cases in judicial application of law

Full Text:

PDF

References


LITERATURE

Dolecki H., Ciężar dowodu w polskim procesie cywilnym, Warszawa 1998.

Dziedziak W., Justice as Relations in Social Life, “Studia Iuridica Lublinensia” 2023, vol. 32(2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2023.32.2.103-115.

Dziedziak W., Kilka uwag o dyskrecjonalności sędziowskiej nakierowanej na sprawiedliwość, [in:] Omnia sunt interpretanda. Teoria i dogmatyka prawnicza. Księga jubileuszowa dedykowana Profesorowi Leszkowi Leszczyńskiemu, eds. A. Korybski, B. Liżewski, Lublin 2023.

Dziedziak W., O prawie słusznym (perspektywa systemu prawa stanowionego), Lublin 2015.

Dziedziak W., Przyrodzona godność człowieka podstawą sprawiedliwości. Znaczenie oraz kilka racji uzasadniających, “Prawo i Więź” 2023, no. 1, DOI: https://doi.org/10.36128/priw.vi44.532.

Gizbert-Studnicki T., Prawda sądowa w postępowaniu cywilnym, “Państwo i Prawo” 2009, no. 7.

Górski A., Orzecznictwo Sądu Najwyższego w kwestii dowodu z urzędu jako szansy ustalenia prawdy w procesie cywilnym, [in:] Prawda w postępowaniu cywilnym. Quid est veritas?, eds. M. Strus-Wołos, M. Wieczorek, Radom 2021.

Korybski A., Leszczyński L., Stanowienie i stosowanie prawa. Elementy teorii, Warszawa 2015.

Leszczyński L., Zirk-Sadowski M., Wybrane zagadnienia szczegółowe i porównawcze, [in:] System Prawa Administracyjnego, vol. 4: Wykładnia w prawie administracyjnym, eds. R. Hauser, Z. Niewiadomski, A. Wróbel, Warszawa 2015.

Mazurek F.J., Godność osoby ludzkiej podstawą praw człowieka, Lublin 2001.

Piechowiak M., Dobro wspólne jako fundament polskiego porządku konstytucyjnego, Warszawa 2012.

Szot A., Swoboda decyzyjna w stosowaniu prawa przez administrację publiczną, Lublin 2016.

Waśkiewicz H., Prawo naturalne – prawo czy norma moralna, “Roczniki Filozoficzne” 1970, vol. 18(2).

Wroczyński K., Ius, [in:] Powszechna encyklopedia filozofii, vol. 5, Lublin 2004.

Wróblewski J., Sądowe stosowanie prawa, Warszawa 1988.

ONLINE SOURCES

Aristotle, Nicomachean Ethics, vol. 19, Cambridge–London 1934, https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text.jsp?doc=Perseus:text:1999.01.0054 (access: 9.4.2025).

John Paul II, Evangelium vitae, 34, 1995, https://www.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_25031995_evangelium-vitae.html (access: 9.4.2025).

John Paul II, Sollicitudo rei socialis, 29, 1987, https://www.vatican.va/content/john-paul-ii/en/encyclicals/documents/hf_jp-ii_enc_30121987_sollicitudo-rei-socialis.html (access: 9.4.2025).

Plato, Gorgias, [in:] Plato in Twelve Volumes, vol. 3, Cambridge–London 1967, https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Plat.+Gorg.+469b&fromdoc=Perseus%3Atext%3A1999.01.0178 (access: 9.4.2025).

Xenophon, Xenophon in Seven Volumes, Cambridge–London 1923, https://www.perseus.tufts.edu/hopper/text?doc=Perseus:text:1999.01.0208 (access: 9.4.2025).

LEGAL ACTS

Constitution of the Republic of Poland of 2 April 1997 (Journal of Laws 1997, no. 78, item 483, as amended).

International Covenant on Civil and Political Rights, New York, 16 December 1966, UNTS vol. 999.

International Covenant on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights, New York, 16 December 1966, UNTS vol. 993.

Universal Declaration of Human Rights, adopted and proclaimed by General Assembly resolution 217 A (III) of 10 December 1948.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/sil.2025.34.2.99-112
Date of publication: 2025-09-25 23:21:17
Date of submission: 2024-12-01 14:35:18


Statistics


Total abstract view - 0
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF - 0

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2025 Wojciech Dziedziak

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.