Comparative Legal Frameworks for Protecting Elderly People from Cyberfraud
Abstract
Recent years have seen a dramatic increase in cybercrime targeting seniors. In countries like Poland, specific scam methods such as the “grandson” or “policeman” trick and phishing attacks have become prevalent, often resulting in the loss of life savings. Despite the growing scale of the problem, criminology faces challenges in accurately measuring the extent of internet fraud. The internet’s reach and anonymity facilitate these crimes, making detection and prevention more difficult than with traditional methods. This raises critical questions about the adequacy of current legal protections for the elderly and whether criminal law should address the exploitation of their gullibility or ignorance. By examining legal definitions, perpetrators’ modus operandi, and comparative international solutions, the study aims to assess whether existing frameworks sufficiently safeguard seniors and to explore the potential for harmonized cross-border legal measures to better protect this increasingly targeted demographic.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
LITERATURE
Bańkowski A., Etymologiczny słownik języka polskiego, vol. 2, Warszawa 2000.
Chin C., Cybercrime and Cyberfraud, [in:] The Internet Encyclopedia, ed. H. Bidgoli, vol. 1, Hoboken 2004, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1002/047148296X.tie030.
Clough J., Principles of Cybercrime, New York 2010, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1017/CBO9780511845123.
Fischer P., Lea S.E., Evans K.M., Why Do Individuals Respond to Fraudulent Scam Communications and Lose Money? The Psychological Determinants of Scam Compliance, “Journal of Applied Social Psychology” 2013, vol. 43(10), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/jasp.12158.
Heaton R., Criminal Law: Textbook, Oxford 2006.
Hlavica C., Klapproth U. (eds.), Tax Fraud & Forensic Accounting. Umgang mit Wirtschaftskriminalität, Wiesbaden 2011, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-8349-6444-1.
Shang Y., Wu Z., Du X., Jiang Y., Ma B., Chi M., The Psychology of the Internet Fraud Victimization of Older Adults: A Systematic Review, “Frontiers in Psychology” 2022, vol. 13, DOI: https://doi.org/10.3389/fpsyg.2022.912242.
Shao J., Du W., Lin T., Li X., Li J., Lei H., Credulity Rather Than General Trust May Increase Vulnerability to Fraud in Older Adults: A Moderated Mediation Model, “Journal of Elder Abuse & Neglect” 2019, vol. 31(2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/08946566.2018.1564105.
Siwicki M., Charakterystyka sprawcy i ofiary „cyberoszustwa”, [in:] Problemy bezpieczeństwa Europy i Azji, eds. T. Ambroziak, A. Czwołek, S. Gajewski, M. Nowak-Paralusz, Toruń 2016.
Siwicki M., Prawo karne wobec oszustw i innych związanych z nimi przestępstw w handlu internetowym oraz bankowości elektronicznej, Toruń 2018.
Sobol E., Słownik języka polskiego, Warszawa 2005.
Šepec M., Slovenian Criminal Code and Modern Criminal Law Approach to Computer-Related Fraud: A Comparative Legal Analysis, “International Journal of Cyber Criminology” 2012, vol. 6(2).
Oczkowski T., [in:] System Prawa Karnego, vol. 9: Przestępstwa przeciwko mieniu i gospodarcze, ed. R. Zawłocki, Warszawa 2015.
Vishwanath A., Herath T., Chen R., Wang J., Rao H.R., Why Do People Get Phished? Testing Individual Differences in Phishing Vulnerability within an Integrated, Information Processing Model, “Decision Support Systems” 2011, vol. 51(3), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.dss.2011.03.002.
Wells J.T., Bradford N.S., Geis G., Gill J.D., Kramer W.M., Ratley J.D., Robertson J., Fraud Examiners Manual, Austin 2011.
ONLINE SOURCES
“Aktywny Senior” 2023–2024, no. 7, https://www.wib.org.pl/wp-content/uploads/2023/12/231215-aktywny-senior-07-2023-2024.pdf (access: 20.8.2025).
Association of Certified Fraud Examiners, Fraud Examiners Manual, 2009, http://thelawdictionary.org/fraud (access: 20.8.2025).
Bischoff P., What Is the Nigerian Scam (419 Scam) with Examples, 22.9.2023, https://www.comparitech.com/identity-theft-protection/nigerian-scam (access: 20.8.2025).
Eurostat, Digitalisation in Europe – 2025 Edition, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/interactive-publications/digitalisation-2025 (access: 20.8.2025).
Eurostat, People Online in 2024, https://ec.europa.eu/eurostat/web/products-eurostat-news/w/ddn-20241217-1 (access: 20.8.2025).
FBI, Elder Fraud, https://www.fbi.gov/how-we-can-help-you/safety-resources/scams-and-safety/common-scams-and-crimes/elder-fraud (access: 20.8.2025).
Gill M., Walsh R., Senior Scam Statistics, 16.1.2024, https://www.comparitech.com/identity-theft-protection/senior-scam-statistics (access: 20.8.2025).
Investopedia, How Does a Pump-and-Dump Scam Work?, 13.1.2022, https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/05/061205.asp (access: 20.8.2025).
Jaroszewski D., Polscy seniorzy masowo się na to nabierają. Straty sięgają 141 mln zł, 28.12.2023, https://www.telepolis.pl/tech/bezpieczenstwo/oszustwo-wnuczek-nask-statystyki (access: 20.8.2025).
La Morgia M., Mei A., Sassi F., Stefa J., Pump and Dumps in the Bitcoin Era: Real Time Detection of Cryptocurrency Market Manipulations, 2020, https://ieeexplore.ieee.org/document/9209660 (access: 20.8.2025).
Monitor, FBI alarmuje: Amerykanie stracili rekordowe 16,6 mld dolarów w 2024 roku w wyniku przestępstw internetowych, 23.4.2025, https://www.monitorlocalnews.com/fbi-alarmuje-amerykanie-stracili-rekordowe-16-6-mld-dolarow-w-2024-roku-w-wyniku-przestepstw-internetowych (access: 20.8.2025).
Palmer D., Cybersecurity: Why More Needs to Be Done to Help Older People Stay Safe Online, 12.11.2019, https://www.zdnet.com/article/cybersecurity-why-more-needs-to-be-done-to-help-older-people-stay-safe-online (access: 20.8.2025).
Pascual M., Las estafas por internet representan más del 80% de los ciberdelitos, 6.8.2021, https://www.newtral.es/estafas-internet-ciberdelitos/20210806 (access: 20.8.2025).
Portal Radia Deon, W 2023 roku seniorzy w USA stracili ponad 3 mld USD na skutek oszustw, 2.5.2024, https://deon24.com/2024/05/02/w-2023-roku-seniorzy-w-usa-stracili-ponad-3-mld-usd-na-skutek-oszustw (access: 20.8.2025).
Rymsza A., Seniorzy są łatwym celem oszustw w Internecie. Trzeba zadbać o ich edukację!, 13.11.2019, https://www.dobreprogramy.pl/seniorzy-sa-latwym-celem-oszustw-w-internecie-trzeba-zadbac-o-ich-edukacje,6628728443115137a (access: 20.8.2025).
United Kingdom, Cabinet Office, Identity Fraud: A Study, July 2022, https://www.ojp.gov/ncjrs/virtual-library/abstracts/identity-fraud-study (access: 20.8.2025).
Walsh R., Bischoff P., US Cyber Security and Cybercrime Statistics, 10.1.2024, https://www.comparitech.com/blog/information-security/us-cyber-crime-statistics (access: 20.8.2025).
LEGAL ACTS
Criminal Code of Bulgaria (2017). SG No. 85/24.10.2017.
Criminal Code of Estonia (2001). RT I 2001, 61, 364.
Criminal Code of Finland (2022).
Criminal Code of France (2024).
Criminal Code of Germany (2018). BGBl. 2024 I Nr. 109.
Criminal Code of Italy (2018).
Criminal Code of Latvia (2023).
Criminal Code of the Netherlands (2012).
Criminal Code of Poland (1997). Consolidated text, Journal of Laws 2024, item 17.
Criminal Code of the Republic of Ukraine (2001).
Criminal Code of Slovakia (2019). 474/2019 Coll.
Criminal Code of Spain (2024). Organic Law 10/1995, of 23 November, 33987-34058.
Criminal Code of Sweden (2020). SFS 1962:700 Brottsbalken.
Criminal Code of Switzerland (2020). StGB, SR 311.0.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/sil.2025.34.2.321-341
Date of publication: 2025-09-25 23:21:42
Date of submission: 2024-09-05 12:19:01
Statistics
Indicators
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2025 Maciej Siwicki

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.