Engaging Lectures: Philosophy through Relevance and Recency

Kamil Lemanek

Résumé


The article addresses the challenge of student engagement in undergraduate lectures on philosophy. It presents a variation of the problem-based approach to course design, proposing an emphasis on relevance and recency as effective means for drawing students into the material, while also helping them to understand that philosophy is very much alive today. Two example modules are also provided to illustrate the idea – one concerning personal identity and the other concerning existentialism. They can be adapted and integrated into existing courses outright, or they may be used as models informing the development of new modules exploring different issues.


Mots-clés


course design; module; engagement; lecture; higher education

Texte intégral :

PDF (English)

Références


Anderman, E.M., Maehr, M.L. (1994). Motivation and Schooling in the Middle Grades. Review of Educational Research, 64(2), 287–309. DOI: 10.3102/00346543064002287

Beauvoir, S. (2011). The Second Sex. New York: Random House.

Blackburn, S. (1999). Think. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Chaffee, J. (2015). The Philosopher’s Way. London: Pearson.

Copleston, F. (1946). A History of Philosophy. London: Burns, Oates & Washbourne.

Cornford, I. (1997). Ensuring Effective Learning from Modular Courses: A Cognitive. Journal of Vocational Education & Training, 49(2), 237–251. DOI: 10.1080/13636829700200014

Dostoevsky, F. (1994). Notes from Underground. New York: Random House.

Garvey, J., Stangroom, J. (2012). The Story of Philosophy: A History of Western Thought. London: Hachette.

Gettings, M. (2013). Student-Centered Discussions in Introductory Philosophy: A Case Study on the Nature of Art. Teaching Philosophy, 36(4), 321–336.

Goldschmid, B., Goldschmid, M.L. (1973). Modular Instruction in Higher Education: A Review. Higher Education, 2, 15–32. DOI: 10.1007/BF00162534

Jang, H., Reeve, J., Deci, E.L. (2010). Engaging Students in Learning Activities: It Is Not Autonomy Support or Structure but Autonomy Support and Structure. Journal of Educational Psychology, 102(3), 588–600. DOI: 10.1037/a0019682

Kierkegaard, S. (1980). The Concept of Anxiety. Princeton: Princeton University Press.

Kierkegaard, S. (2006). Fear and Trembling. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Locke, J. (2004). An Essay Concerning Human Understanding. Project Gutenberg.

Moore, B., Bruder, K. (2023). Philosophy: The Power of Ideas. New York: McGraw Hill.

Nietzsche, F. (1911). The Genealogy of Morals. London: Foulis.

Nietzsche, F. (2010). The Gay Science. New York: Random House.

Parfit, D. (1984). Reasons and Persons. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Perry, J., Bratman, M., Fischer, J. (2021). Introduction to Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Reid, T. (2011). Essays on the Intellectual Powers of Man. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Sartre, J.-P. (1993). Being and Nothingness. New York: Washington Square Press.

Shoemaker, S. (1984). Identity, Cause, and Mind: Philosophical Essays. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.

Titus, H., Smith, M., Nolan, R. (1994). Living Issues in Philosophy. Oxford: Oxford University Press.

Wolfe, K. (2022). Reclaiming Reasoning: A Cooperative Approach to Critical Thinking. Teaching Philosophy, 45(2), 209–237.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/en.2024.9.259-272
Date of publication: 2024-10-24 23:37:58
Date of submission: 2023-08-31 14:13:57


Statistiques


Visibilité des résumés - 1
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF (English) - 0

Indicateurs



Renvois

  • Il n'y a présentement aucun renvoi.


Droit d'auteur (c) 2024, Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska, sectio N – Educatio Nova

Licence Creative Commons
Ce(tte) œuvre est mise à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.