- Focus and Scope
- Section Policies
- Peer Review Process
- Publication Frequency
- Open Access Policy
- Indexing
- Reviewers
- The current ethical principles in the academic journal Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, sectio F – History
Focus and Scope
Annales UMCS sec. F publishes papers that describe research results of historians from Middle Ages to the modern Times. Political history is a dominant field of study of the journal, but social history, microhistory in Poland and abroad are also important issues.
Section Policies
Artykuły
 Open Submissions |
Indexed |
Peer Reviewed |
Materials
| Open Submissions |
Indexed |
Peer Reviewed |
Reviews
| Open Submissions |
Indexed |
 Peer Reviewed |
Reports
| Open Submissions |
Indexed |
Peer Reviewed |
Biograms
| Open Submissions |
Indexed |
Peer Reviewed |
Reviews
| Open Submissions |
Indexed |
Peer Reviewed |
Peer Review Process
- Articles are subjected for peer review after preliminary evaluation and acceptance by the editorial team of the journal.
- Two independent reviewers from outside of the faculty employing the Author with a degree of at least an assistant-professor (doktor habilitowany) are being appointed.
- The review is a double-blind process, which means that the author and reviewer do not know their identities.
- The review should be done in the panel form of the journal. It must end with a conclusion whether an article should be published or rejected.
- Names of reviewers are not disclosed. Annales UMCS, sec. F publishes the names of its reviewers.
Publication Frequency
Nabór artykułów do vol. 75 za 2020 rok trwa do 30 czerwca 2020 r.
Open Access Policy
This journal provides immediate open access to its content on the principle that making research freely available to the public supports a greater global exchange of knowledge.
Indexing
- BazHum
- CEJSH (The Central European Journal of Social Sciences and Humanities)
- Celdes CNKI Scholar (China National Knowledge Infrastructure)
- CNPIEC De Gruyter - IBR (International Bibliography of Reviews of Scholarly Literature in the Humanities and Social Sciences)
- De Gruyter - IBZ (International Bibliography of Periodical Literature in the Humanities and Social Sciences)
- EBSCO - Historical Abstracts
- EBSCO - TOC Premier
- Google Scholar
- International Medieval Bibliography
- J-Gate
- JournalTOCs
- Naviga (Softweco)
- Primo Central (ExLibris)
- ProQuest - Research Library
- ReadCube
- Summon (Serials Solutions/ProQuest)
- TDOne (TDNet)
- Ulrich's Periodicals Directory/ulrichsweb
- WorldCat(OCLC)
Reviewers
2017
prof. Witalij Andriejev
dr hab. Zbigniew Dalewski
prof. dr hab. Joanna Gierowska-Kałłaur
dr hab. Andrzej Gil
prof. Ihor Hyrych
prof. dr hab. Wojciech Iwańczak
dr hab. Roman Jurkowski
prof. dr hab. Jarosław Kita
dr hab. Jolanta Kolbuszewska
dr hab. Adam Krawiec
prof. dr hab. Grzegorz Kucharczyk
dr hab. Dorota Malczewska–Pawelec
prof. dr hab. Beata Możejko
prof. dr hab. Zdzisław Noga
dr hab. Aneta Pieniądz
dr hab. Jacek Piotrowski
dr hab. Joanna Sadowska
dr hab. Tomasz Sikorski
prof. dr hab. Wojciech Śleszyński
dr hab. Agnieszka Teterycz-Puzio
dr hab. Piotr Węcowski
prof. dr hab. Marek Wilczyński
prof. dr hab. Przemysław Wiszewski
prof. dr hab. Janusz Wrona
2018
Prof. Dr Jürgen Heyde
Dr hab. Anna Jabłońska
Prof. dr hab. Jarosław Kita
Prof. dr hab. Anna Landau-Czajka
Prof. dr hab. Zdzisław Noga
Dr hab. Anna Paroń
Dr hab. Jacek Pielas
Dr hab. Zrinka Serventi
Dr hab. Miłosz Skrzypek
Dr hab. Marcin Starzyński
Dr hab. Adam Szweda
Dr hab. Damian Szymczak
Prof. dr hab. Małgorzata Świder
Dr hab. Agnieszka Teterycz-Puzio
Prof. dr hab. Stanisław Wiech
Prof. dr hab. Marek Wilczyński
2019
Prof. dr hab. Dániel Bagi
Dr hab. Tomasz Ciesielski
Dr hab. Bożena Czwojdrak
Dr hab. Marcin Danielewski
Dr hab. Dariusz Dąbrowski
Dr Robert Gawkowski
Dr hab. Radosław Gross
Dr Ansgar Holtmann
Prof. dr hab. Roman Jurkowski
Dr hab. Leszek Kania
Dr hab. Norbert Kasperek
Prof. dr hab. Jarosław Kita
Dr hab. Jacek Legieć
Dr hab. Marzena Matla
Prof. dr hab. Beata Możejko
Dr Vitaliy Nagirnyy
Dr Martin Nodl
Dr hab. Jerzy Pająk
Dr hab. Jacek Pielas
Prof. dr hab. Bożena Popiołek
Prof. dr hab. Stanisław Sroka
Dr hab. Arkadiusz Stasiak
Prof. dr hab. Andrzej Stroynowski
Dr hab. Magdalena Ujma
Dr hab. Jacek Wołoszyn
Dr hab. Wioletta Zawitkowska
2020
Ph. D. Přemysl Bar
dr hab. Mariusz Drozdowski
dr hab. Dobiesław Dudek
dr hab. Julia Dziwoki
dr hab. Zbigniew Hojka
dr hab. Lucyna Kostuch
dr hab. Krzysztof Lesiakowski
dr hab. Gościwit Malinowski
dr hab. Krzysztof Mikołajczuk
prof. dr hab. Eugeniusz Mironowicz
Ph. D. Nevyan Mitev
dr hab. Artur Pasko
dr hab. Jacek Pielas
prof. dr hab. Marek Przeniosło
dr hab. Joanna Sadowska
dr hab. Aliaksandr Smalianchuk
prof. dr hab. Stanisław Sroka
prof. dr hab. Sobiesław Szybkowski
dr hab. Damian Szymczak
dr hab. Agnieszka Teterycz-Puzio
prof. dr hab. Stanisław Wiech
dr hab. Jolanta Załęczny
2021
prof. dr hab. Michał Baczkowski
Ph.D Dubravka Božić-Bogović
dr hab. Katarzyna Chmielewska
dr hab. Piotr Cichoracki
dr hab. Edyta Czop
prof. dr hab. Jolanta Daszyńska
prof. dr hab. Adam Dobroński
dr hab. Joanna Dudek-Klimiuk
prof. dr hab. Piotr Franaszek
Ph.D hab. Denys Grechko
prof. dr hab. Marek Jabłonowski
dr hab. Dariusz Jeziorny
prof. dr hab. Roman Jurkowski
dr hab. Leszek Kania
prof. dr hab. Witold Kołbuk
dr hab. Walentyna Korpalska
dr hab. Lucyna Kostuch
dr hab. Barbara Kowalska
dr hab. Eryk Krasucki
dr hab. Artur Markowski
dr hab. Małgorzata Milecka
prof. dr hab. Eugeniusz Mironowicz
dr hab. Janusz Myszczyszyn
prof. dr hab. Dariusz Nawrot
dr hab. Piotr Niwiński
prof. dr hab. Przemysław Olstowski
prof. dr hab. Grzegorz Ostasz
dr hab. Andrzej Pieczewski
prof. dr hab. Marek Przeniosło
dr hab. Joanna Sadowska
PhD Teodora Shek Brnardić
dr hab. Robert Skobelski
prof. dr hab. Jerzy Sperka
dr hab. Arkadiusz Stasiak
prof. dr hab. Janusz Szczepański
prof. Sergiy Taranenko
dr hab. Agnieszka Teterycz-Puzio
dr hab. Maciej Trąbski
prof. dr hab. Bożena Urbanek
dr hab. Miron Urbaniak
prof. dr hab. Mariusz Wołos
dr hab. Jolanta Załęczny
dr hab. Zdzisław Zblewski
2022
dr hab. Katarzyna Balbuza
dr hab. Konrad Bobiatyński
dr hab. Aneta Bołdyrew
dr hab. Maciej Bugajewski
dr Katarzyna Chmielewska
prof. dr hab. Ilona Czamańska
prof. dr hab. Jan Draus
prof. dr hab. Tadeusz Epsztein
prof. dr hab. Ryszard Grzesik
dr hab. Paweł Gut
prof. dr hab. Bohdan Halczak
dr hab. Anna Jabłońska
prof. dr hab. Jarosław Kita
dr Janusz Kłapeć
prof. dr hab. Jolanta Kolbuszewska
dr hab. Mariusz Kulik
dr hab. Andrzej Kuropatnicki
dr hab. Jacek Legieć
prof. dr hab. Anna Pobóg-Lenartowicz
dr hab. Andrei Matsuk
dr hab. Anita Młynarczyk-Tomczyk
prof. dr hab. Dariusz Nawrot
dr Anna Nowakowska-Wierzchoś
dr Tomasz Osiński
dr hab. Marcin Pawlak
dr hab. Wojciech Piasek
dr hab. Joanna Pisulińska
prof. dr hab. Marian Ptak
dr hab. Tomasz Pudłocki
prof. dr hab. Andrzej Rachuba
prof. dr hab. Aleksandra Skrzypietz
dr hab. Arkadiusz Stasiak
dr hab. Tomasz Stryjek
dr hab. Krzysztof Ślusarek
prof. Aleksei Vasiliev
prof. dr hab. Gabriela Wąs
2023
dr hab. Małgorzata Bronikowska
dr Robert Dudziński
dr Bogumiła Fiołek-Lubczyńska
dr hab. Anna Gerecka-Żołyńska
dr hab. Ryszard Gryz
dr hab. Hieronim Kaczmarek
dr hab. Piotr Kardela
prof. dr hab. Jarosław Kita
prof. dr hab. Maciej Kokoszko
dr Bartosz Kołoczek
dr hab. Lucyna Kostuch
dr hab. Marcin Kruszyński
dr hab. Jacek Legieć
dr hab. Krzysztof Lesiakowski
dr hab. Małgorzata Machałek
dr hab. Eligiusz Małolepszy
dr hab. Mariola Marczak
dr hab. Katarzyna Mąka-Malatyńska
dr hab. Maria Musielak
dr hab. Marta Pomykała
dr hab. Arkadiusz Stasiak
dr hab. Joanna Szczutkowska
dr hab. Krzysztof Ślusarek
dr Filip Taterka
dr hab. Irena Wodzianowska
The current ethical principles in the academic journal Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, sectio F – History
Taking care of a high quality of the publication and the scientific integrity, the editorial office of the scientific journal „Annales UMCS sec. F” postulates the requiring the application of the moral principles specified below. The principles are for authors of the scientific publications,the editors,the reviewers,as well as the members of the Editorial Office.
The authors
The person who provides the creative contribution in the concept of the work, the realisation of a research and the interpretation of obtained results, is identified as an author of a work. The person who sends a research paper is obliged to forward the information about all of the authors including defining their contribution to the creation of the paper.
The appropriate form can be found on the website of the journal. The author should give the information about funding sources of the publication and the contribution of the scientific – research institutions, associations and other operations which may impast the result of the research given in a paper.
Both plagiarism and autoplagiarism are considered to be illegal practices. The articles which are sent to „Annales UMCS sec. F” can be solely and exclusively original texts which do not infringe Rother persons` copyright and have not been either Publisher Or sent to print in Rother magazine. The articles related to the submission of a text being translated into another language of the publication which was already published are considered unethical. No activities related to ghost writing and guest authorship are allowed as they are manifestation of scientific dishonesty. By ghostwriting is meant a situation in which a given person who makes a significant contribution to the creation of a text, was not indicated as one of the authors or a person whose role was not mentioned in the listings included in the publication.
By guest authorship is meant a situation in which a given person who does not make any contribution to the creation of a text and was indicated as an author of the publication.
Revealing any of the situations will cause rejecting of a text.
Editorial Office
The editor-in- chief is responsible for decisions about publishing articles and choosing which articles should be edited. The conclusions of reviews , secretary`s opinion and The Scientific Board should be taken into account. The editor-in-chief rejects an article in case of plagiarism or autoplagiarism. In case of any doubts about authorship or co-authorship of an article. The author`s background, his nationality, religion, sex , sexual orientation or political views are not taken into account while making decisions about accepting or rejecting a text.
The editorial Office does not reveal the author`s data to the reviewers or the reviewers` data to the authors. The editorial office does not designate as reviewers a person who is employed in the same institution as an author or if an author and a reviewer are in any relationship.
The Reviewer
A review should be objective and in a dispute with an author Orly scientific arguments should be used, expressed in a clear and understandable way. Personal criticism is unacceptable.
The revied scientific works are confidential, they cannot be given or shown to other people. It is also inappropriate to discuss about them aside from The Editorial Office or Scientific Board.
All reviews are anonymus. The reviewers are obliged to resign from writing the review in case of any conflicts caused by relationship with the author or an institution represented by the author.
The reviewer should inform the editorial office about any cases of infringements of ethical standards by the author of an article.
The reviewer, who can not review the scientific work in a given period of time should inform the editorial office and resign from the function of the reviewer as soon as possible.
The ethical principles were developed and based on the recommendations of COPE Committee on Publication Ethics included in Code of Conduct and Best Practice Guidelines for Journal Editors.