Contempt Speech and Hate Speech: Characteristics, Determinants and Consequences

Monika Obrębska

Abstract


Hate speech is defined as verbal abuse against minority groups. Its emotional basis is contempt which activates anger and revulsion. Therefore, it seems to be justified to speak of “contempt speech and hate speech” as a spreading social phenomenon, in effect resulting in a generalised deterioration in attitudes toward minorities. Exposure to hate speech also leads to the phenomenon of desensitisation: the more frequent contact with hate speech in the environment is, the more accustomed to it people become, ceasing to perceive hate speech as a serious social problem. It plays an enormous role in the current social life. It is a tool used in political strife and public debate, excluding dialogue and consensus. All these reasons justify a necessity to academically address the issues of speech of contempt and speech of hate. The aim of this article is to attempt to understand and integrate motivational, cognitive and social determinants of speech of hate referring to classic social psychology studies on prejudices and stereotypes, show its psychosocial consequences and distinguish characteristic features which enable precise qualifying of a given message as this category of lingusitic usus.

 


Keywords


hate speech; minority groups; social prejudices; desensitisation

Full Text:

PDF

References


Adorno, T.W., Frenkel-Brunswik, E., Levinson, D.J., Sanford, R.N. (1950). The authoritarian personality. Oxford: Harpers.

Allen, J.J., Anderson, C.A., Bushman, B.J. (2018). The general aggression model. Current Opinion in Psychology, 19, 75 –80.

Altemeyer, B. (1996). The Authoritarian Specter. Cambridge: Harvard University Press.

Bandura, A. (2007). Teoria społecznego uczenia się. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Bera, R. (2019). Mowa nienawiści źródłem przemocy i agresji. Annales UMCS, 32(3), 59-66.

Bilewicz, M. (2015). Polak mówi o Obcym – psychologia mowy nienawiści. Remapping Europe, 24-27. Retrieved from https://www.academia.edu/10815382/Polak_mówi_o_Obcym_-_psychologia_mowy_nienawiści

Bilewicz, M. (2020). Koronawirus uprzedzeń i ksenofobii. Jak patogeny wpływają na poglądy? Gazeta Wyborcza, 7.03.

Błażewicz, M.A. (2017). Autorytaryzm, niepewność Ja, identyfikacja grupowa i postawy wobec grupy obcej (unpublished doctoral dissertation). Retrieved from: https://depotuw.ceon.pl/handle/item/2532?show=full

Bastian, B., Vauclair, C., Loughnan, S., Bain, P., Ashokkumar, A., Becker, M., Bilewicz, M., CollierBaker, E., Crespo, C., Eastwick, P., Fischer, R., Friese, M., Gomez, A., Guerra, V., Guevara Castellanos, J., Hanke, K., Hooper, N., Huang, L., Junqi, S., Karasawa, M. (2019). Explaining illness with evil: Pathogen prevalence fosters moral vitalism. Proceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences, 286(1914)

Carnagey, N.L., Anderson, C.A. (2003). Theory in the study of media violence. The general aggression model. In: D.A. Gentile (ed.), Media violence and children (pp. 87-106). Westport: Praeger.

Chetty, N., Alathur, S. (2018). Hate speech review in the context of online social networks. Aggression and Violent Behavior, 40, 108-118.

Crawford, J., Brandt, M., Inbar, Y., Mallinas, S.R. (2015). Right-wing authoritarianism predicts prejudice equally toward “gay men and lesbians” and “homosexuals”. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 111(2), 31-45.

Cuper, J. (2019). Przestępstwa z nienawiści w Polsce w 2018. Wybrane przypadki. Fundacja Otwarty Dialog. Retrieved from: https://odfoundation.eu/a/9358,przestepstwa-z-nienawisci-w-polsce-w-2018-r-wybrane-przypadki/

Ekehammar, B., Akrami, N., Gylje, M., Zakrisson, I. (2004). What matters most to prejudice: Big five personality, social dominance orientation, or right-wing authoritarianism? European Journal of Personality, 18(6), 463-482.

Fasoli, F., Paladino, M.P., Carnaghi, A., Jetten, J., Bastian, B., Bain, P.G. (2015). Not "just words". Exposure to homophobic epithets leads to dehumanizing and physical distancing from gay men. European Journal of Social Psychology, 46(2), 237-248.

Fritsche, I., Jonas, E., Fankhaenel, T. (2008). The role of control motivation in mortality salience effects on ingroup support and defense. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 95, 524-541.

Głowiński, M. (2007). Retoryka nienawiści. Nauka, 2, 19-27.

Greenberg, J., Pyszczynski, T. (1985). The effect of an overheard ethnic slur on evaluation of the target: How to spread a social disease. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 21, 61-72.

Huang J., Sedlovskaya A., Ackerman J., Bargh J. (2011). Immunizing Against Prejudice: Effects of Disease Protection on Attitudes Toward Out-Groups. Psychological Science, 22(12), 1550-1556.

Jakubowska-Branicka, I. (2013). O dogmatycznych narracjach. Studium nienawiści. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Trio.

Jakubowska-Branicka, I. (2017). Skąd się bierze mowa nienawiści i jak z nią walczyć? Polityka, 6.06.

Juza, M. (2015). Hejterstwo w komunikacji internetowej: charakterystyka zjawiska, przyczyny i sposoby przeciwdziałania. Profilaktyka społeczna i resocjalizacja, 25, 27-50.

Kofta M., Bilewicz, M. (2011). Wobec obcych. Zagrożenia psychologiczne a stosunki międzygrupowe. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Kofta, M., Narkiewicz-Jodko, W., Kobyliński, P. (2011). Deprywacja kontroli a poznanie i postawy międzygrupowe: znaczenie deficytów poznawczych i afektywnych. In: M. Kofta, M. Bilewicz (red.). Wobec obcych. Zagrożenia psychologiczne a stosunki międzygrupowe (pp. 74–99). Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe PWN.

Kossowska, M. (2005). Umysł niezmienny … Poznawcze mechanizmy sztywności. Kraków: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Jagiellońskiego.

Kossowska, M., Szumowska, E., Szwed, P. (2018). Tolerancja w czasach niepewności. Sopot: Wydawnictwo Smak Słowa.

Kowalski, S., Tulli, M. (2003). Zamiast procesu. Raport o mowie nienawiści. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo ISP PAN.

Kruglanski, A.W., Webster, D.M. (1996). Motivated closing of the mind: "Seizing" and "freezing." Psychological Review, 103(2), 263-283.

Leets, L., Giles H. (1999). Harmful Speech in Intergroup Encounters: An Organizational Framework for Communication Research. Annals of the International Communication Association, 22 (1), 91-137.

Linde-Usiekniewicz, J. (2019). Wybrane problemy rozpoznawania językowych cech „nawoływania do nienawiści”. In: M.Zaśko-Zielińska, K. Kredens (red.). Lingwistyka kryminalistyczna. Teoria i praktyka (pp. 217–231). Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.

Maass, A. (1999). Linguistic intergroup bias: Stereotype perpetuation through language. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 31, 79-121.

McFarland, S. (2010). Authoritarianism, Social Dominance, and Other Roots of Generalized Prejudice. Political Psychology, 31(3), 453 - 477.

Mullen, B., Rice, D.R. (2003). Ethnophaulisms and exclusion. The behavioral consequences of cognitive representation of ethnic immigrant groups. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 29, 1056-1067.

Mullen, B., Smyth, J.M. (2004). Immigrant suicide rates as a function of ethnophaulisms: Hate speech predicts death. Psychosomatic Medicine, 66, 343-348.

Niedenthal, P.M., Krauth-Gruber, S., Ric, F. (2006). Psychology of emotion. Interpersonal, experiential, and cognitive approaches. New York: Psychology Press.

Nycz, A., Obrębska, M. (2020). Potrzeba mitu w czasach niepewności. In: M. Obrębska, A. Pankalla (red.). Mity kultury współczesnej. Perspektywa psychoantropologiczna (pp. 65–86). Poznań: Wydawnictwo Nauk Społecznych i Humanistycznych UAM.

Pratto, F., Sidanius, J., Stallworth, L.M., Malle, B F. (1994). Social dominance orientation: A personality variable predicting social and political attitudes. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 67(4), 741-763.

Radkiewicz, P. (2012). Autorytaryzm a brzytwa Ockhama. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Naukowe Scholar.

Rokeach, M. (1960). The Open and Closed Mind. New York: Basic Books.

Rutjens, B.T., Loseman, A. (2010). The society-supporting self: System justification and cultural worldview defense as different forms of self-regulation. Group Processes & Intergroup Relations, 13, 241-250.

Schaller, M, Kenrick, D., Neel, R., Neuberg, S., (2017). Evolution and human motivation: A fundamental motives framework. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 11(6), 1-15.

Shah, J.Y., Kruglanski, A.W., Thompson, E.P. (1998). Membership has its (epistemic) rewards: Need for closure effects on in-group bias. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 75(2), 383-393.

Soral, W., Bilewicz, M., Winiewski, M. (2018). Exposure to hate speech increases prejudice through desensitization. Aggressive Behavior, 44, 136-146.

Sullivan, D., Landau, M.J., Rothschild, Z.K. (2010). An existential function of enemyship: Evidence that people attribute influence to personal and political enemies to compensate for threats to control. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 98, 434-449.

Tokarczuk, O. (2020). Okna. Gazeta Wyborcza, 04.04.2020.

Van Hiel, A., Pandelaere M., Duriez, B. (2004). The impact of need for closure on conservative beliefs and racism: differential mediation by authoritarian submission and authoritarian dominance. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 30(7), 824-37.

Winiewski, M., Hansen, K., Bilewicz, M., Soral, W., Świderska, A., Bulska, D. (2017). Mowa nienawiści, mowa pogardy. Raport z badania przemocy werbalnej wobec grup mniejszościowych. Warszawa: Wydawnictwo Sowa.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/j.2020.33.3.9-20
Date of publication: 2020-10-31 02:03:44
Date of submission: 2020-04-20 11:44:41


Statistics


Total abstract view - 3408
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF - 1443

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2020

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.