Type of Self-Regulation Depending on Sex and Temperament in Early Adulthood

Monika Cwynar, Patrycja Pleban, Anna Pliś, Dorota Mącik

Abstract


There are two systems of autoregulation: promotional and preventive. They influence making decisions and realization of goals. As in the case of strategy, we distinguish Behavioral Inhibition System and Behavioral Activation System that adjust the actions. The aim was to answer the question whether temperament and sex differentiate strategies and self-regulation systems. 105 people was tested (51 men and 54 women). The following methods were used for the study: The Promotional and Preventive Self-regulation Scale SSPP, Temperament Questionnaire PTS and BIS-BAS Scale.

The results show that women are significantly more likely to experience Behavioral Inhibition System (BIS) than men; there are no differences between the promotional and preventive strategy. As regards the temperament, people with low agitation have a stronger inhibition system and lower promotional strategy than people with high agitation. People with low inhibition exhibit a stronger Behavioral Activation System (BAS) than people with high inhibition. Furthermore, in the group of women, temperament does not explain BAS and prevention variability, but in the group of men such a relationship is significant. On the other hand, regression analysis results for the variation of BIS and promotion strategies observed in both groups are similar – the effect of agitation is noticeable. There are clear dependencies between temperament and regulation systems.


Keywords


BIS; BAS; regulation strategies; temperament

Full Text:

PDF (Język Polski)

References


Aaker J.L., Lee A.Y. (2001), “I” Seek Pleasures and “We” Avoid Pains: The Role of Self-Regulatory Goals in Information Processing and Persuasion, “Journal of Consumer Research”, Vol. 28(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/321946.

Bąk W. (2008), Teoria ukierunkowań regulacyjnych E. Tory Higginsa, ,,Roczniki Psychologiczne”, nr 1.

Bąk W., Bondyra-Łuczka E., Łaguna M. (2015), Kwestionariuszowe Metody Pomiaru Ukierunkowań Regulacyjnych. Polskie Adaptacje Kwestionariuszy RFQ i RFS, „Psychologia Społeczna X”, nr 32.

Bąk W., Roczniewska M., Kolańczyk A. (2013), Skala samoregulacji promocyjnej i prewencyjnej, „Psychologia Społeczna VIII”, nr 25.

Brycz H. (2006), Strategie samoregulacji w obliczu doznanej porażki, „Przegląd Psychogiczny”, nr 49(4).

Camacho Ch.J., Higgins E.T., Luger L. (2003), Moral value transfer from regulatory fit: What feels right is right and what feels wrong is wrong, “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, Vol. 84(3), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.84.3.498.

Carver Ch.S., White T.L. (1994), Behavioral inhibition, behavioral activation, and affective responses to impending reward and punishment: The BIS/BAS Scales, “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, Vol. 67(2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.67.2.319.

Fajkowska-Stanik M., Marszal-Wiśniewska M. (2004), Co to jest styl afektywny?, „Przegląd Psychologiczny”, nr 47(3).

Förster J., Higgins E.T. (2005), How Global versus Local Perception Fits Regulatory Focus, “Psychological Science”, Vol. 16(8), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01586.x.

Förster J., Higgins E.T., Bianco A.T. (2003), Speed/accuracy decisions in task performance: Built-in trade-off or separate strategic concerns?, “Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes”, Vol. 90(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/S0749-5978(02)00509-5.

Freitas A.L., Higgins E.T. (2002), Enjoying Goal-Directed Action: The Role of Regulatory Fit, “Psychological Science”, Vol. 13(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/1467-9280.00401.

Higgins E.T. (1989), Continuities and Discontinuities in Self-Regulatory and Self-Evaluative Processes: A Developmental Theory Relating Self and Affect, “Journal of Personality”, Vol. 57(2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-6494.1989.tb00488.x.

Higgins E.T. (2000), Making a good decision: Value from fit, “American Psychologist”, No. 55.

Higgins E.T. (2006), Value from hedonic experience and engagement, “Psychological Review”, No. 113.

Higgins E.T., Shah J., Friedman R. (1997), Emotional responses to goal attainment: Strength of regulatory focus as moderator, “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, Vol. 72(3), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.72.3.515.

Higgins E.T., Tykocinski O. (1992), Seff-Discrepancies and Biographical Memory: Personality and Cognition at the Level of Psychological Situation, “Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin”, Vol. 18(5). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1177/0146167292185002.

Jorm A.F., Christensen H., Henderson A.S., Jacomb P.A., Korten A.E., Rodgers B. (1999), Using the BIS/BAS scales to measure behavioural inhibition and behavioural activation: Factor structure, validity and norms in a large community sample, “Personality and Individual Differences”, Vol. 26.

Kolańczyk A., Bąk W., Roczniewska M. (2013), Skala Samoregulacji Promocyjnej i Prewencyjnej (SSPP), „Psychologia Społeczna”, nr 2.

Liberman N., Idson L.Ch., Camacho Ch.J., Higgins E.T. (1999), Promotion and Prevention choices between stability and change, “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, Vol. 77(6), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.77.6.1135.

Markman A.B., Baldwin G.C., Maddox W.T. (2005), The Interaction of Payoff Structure and Regulatory Focus in Classification, “Psychological Science”, Vol. 16(11), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.2005.01625.x.

Meyer B., Johnson S.L., Winters R. (2001), Responsiveness to Threat and Incentive in Bipolar Disorder: Relations of the BIS/BAS Scales with Symptoms, “Journal of Psychopathology and Behavioral Assessment”, Vol. 23(3), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1023/A:1010929402770.

Moretti M.M., Higgins E.T. (1990), The development of self-system vulnerabilities: Social and cognitive factors in developmental psychopathology, [w:] R.J. Sternberg, J. Kolligian Jr. (eds.), Competence Considered, New Haven, CT: Yale University Press.

Müller J.M., Wytykowska A.M. (2005), Psychometric properties and validation of a Polish adaptation of Carver and White’s BIS/BAS Scales, “Personality and Individual Differences”, Vol. 39(4), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/j.paid.2005.03.006.

Newman J.P., MacCoon D.G., Vaughn L.J., Sadeh N. (2005), Validating a Distinction between Primary and Secondary Psychopathy with Measures of Gray’s BIS and BAS Constructs, “Journal of Abnormal Psychology”, Vol. 114(2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0021-843X.114.2.319.

Oniszczenko W. (1999), Odziedziczalność cech układu nerwowego, „Przegląd Psychologiczny”, nr 42.

Semin G.R., Higgins E.T., Gil de Montes L., Estourget Y., Valencia J.F. (2005), Linguistic Signatures of Regulatory Focus: How Abstraction Fits Promotion More than Prevention, “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, Vol. 89(1). DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.89.1.36.

Shah J., Higgins E.T. (2001), Regulatory concerns and appraisal efficiency: The general impact of promotion and prevention, “Journal of Personality and Social Psychology”, Vol. 80(5), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1037/0022-3514.80.5.693.

Strelau J., Zawadzki B. (1998), Kwestionariusz Temperamentu PTS. Podręcznik, Warszawa: Pracownia Testów Psychologicznych Polskiego Towarzystwa Psychologicznego.

Sutton S.K., Davidson R.J. (1997), Prefrontal Brain Asymmetry: A Biological Substrate of the Behavioral Approach and Inhibition Systems, “Psychological Science”, Vol. 8(3), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1467-9280.1997.tb00413.x.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/j.2017.30.3.77
Date of publication: 2018-01-17 10:12:10
Date of submission: 2017-07-07 23:09:30


Statistics


Total abstract view - 2847
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF (Język Polski) - 7169

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Monika Cwynar, Patrycja Pleban, Anna Pliś, Dorota Mącik

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.