Personalized Politics in Traditional and Social Media: The Case of the 2019 Finnish Parliamentary Elections
Abstract
Personalization of politics is a well-established field of research, yet not much is known about how the phenomenon has been influenced by the increased use of social media as a tool for political communication. In this research we analyze media personalization in newspapers and on social media posts of parties and party leaders during the 2019 Finnish parliamentary elections. Combining quantitative and qualitative content analysis, we find that a) personalized content was more common in newspapers than on social media, and b) the contexts of personalized content were largely similar regardless of media type, suggesting it may be more relevant to speak of “hybrid media personalization” rather than “traditional media personalization” and “social media personalization”. These findings are linked to broader discussions on personalization of politics and the use of social media as a political communication tool.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Adam, S., & Maier, M. (2010). Personalization of politics: A critical review and agenda for research. In C.T. Salmon (Ed.), Communication Yearbook (vol. 34, pp. 213–257). Routledge.
Balmas, M., Rahat, G., Sheafer, T., & Shenhav, S.R. (2014). Two routes to personalized politics: Centralized and decentralized personalization. Party Politics, 20(1), 37–51.
Balmas, M., & Sheafer, T. (2014). Leaders first, countries after: Mediated political personalization in the international arena. Journal of Communication, 63(3), 454–475.
Borg, S., Kestilä-Kekkonen, E., & Wass, H. (2020). Johdanto: Mikä politiikan ilmastonmuutos? In S. Borg, E. Kestilä-Kekkonen, & H. Wass (Eds.), Politiikan ilmastonmuutos (pp. 45–66). Publications of the Ministry of Justice, Reports and Guidelines.
Chadwick, A. (2013). The Hybrid Media System: Politics and Power. Oxford University Press.
Cohen, J. (1960). A coefficient of agreement for nominal scales. Educational and Psychological Measurement, 20, 37–46.
Enli, G., & Skogerbø, E. (2013). Personalized campaigns in party-centric politics: Twitter and Facebook as arenas for political communication. Information, Communication & Society, 16(5), 757–774.
Garzia, D., Ferreira da Silva, F., & De Angelis, A. (2022). Partisan dealignment and the personalisation of politics in West European parliamentary democracies, 1961–2018. West European Politics, 45(2), 311–334.
Grusell, M., & Nord, L. (2020). Not so intimate Instagram: Images of Swedish political party leaders in the 2018 national election campaign. Journal of Political Marketing, 22(2), 92–107.
Holtz-Bacha, C., Langer, A.I., & Merkle, S. (2014). The personalization of politics in comparative perspective: Campaign coverage in Germany and the United Kingdom. European Journal of Communication, 29(2), 153–170.
Isotalus, P. (2017). Mediapoliitikko. Gaudeamus.
Isotalus, P., & Almonkari, M. (2014). Mediatization and political leadership: Perspectives of the Finnish newspapers and party leaders. Journalism Studies, 15(3), 289–303.
Jünger, J., & Keyling, T. (2019). Facepager. An application for automated data retrieval on the web. https://github.com/strohne/Facepager/
Kannasto, E. (2021). I am horrified by all kinds of persona worship!: Constructing Personal Brands of Politicians on Facebook. PhD thesis. University of Vaasa, Finland.
Kannasto, E., Paatelainen, L., & Isotalus, P. (2023). Henkilöityminen eduskuntavaalikampanjassa: Puheenjohtajat ja puolueet sosiaalisessa mediassa. Politiikka, 65(1), 27–52.
Karvonen, L. (2009). The Personalization of Politics: A Study of Parliamentary Democracies. ECPR Press.
Kreiss, D., Lawrence, R.G., & McGregor, S.C. (2018). In their own words: Political practitioner accounts of candidates, audiences, affordances, genres, and timing in strategic social media use. Political Communication, 35, 8–31.
Kriesi, H. (2011). Personalization of national election campaigns. Party Politics, 18(6), 825–844.
Kruikemeier, S., van Noort, G., Vliegenthart, R., & de Vreese, C.H. (2013). Getting closer: The effects of personalized and interactive online political communication. European Journal of Communication, 28(1), 53–66.
Landis, J.R., & Koch, G.G. (1977). The measurement of observer agreement for categorical data. Biometrics, 33, 159–174.
Langer, A.I. (2007). A historical exploration of the personalisation of politics in the print media: The British prime ministers (1945–1999). Parliamentary Affairs, 60(3), 371–387.
Langer, A.I. (2010). The politicization of private persona: Exceptional leaders or the new rule? The case of United Kingdom and the Blair effect. The International Journal of Press/Politics, 15(1), 60–76.
Langer, A.I., & Sagarzazu, I. (2018). Bring back the party: Personalisation, the media and coalition politics. West European Politics, 41(2), 472–495.
Larsson, A.O. (2019). Skiing all the way to the polls: Exploring the popularity of personalized posts on political Instagram accounts. Convergence: The International Journal of Research Into New Media Technologies, 25(5–6), 1096–1110.
Lee, E., Oh, S.Y., Lee, J., & Kim, H.S. (2018). Up close and personal on social media: When do politicians’ personal disclosures enhance vote intention? Journalism & Mass Communication Quarterly, 95(2), 381–403.
Mannevuo, M. (2022). Uneasy self-promotion and tactics of patience: Finnish MPs ambivalent feelings about personalised politics on social media. International Journal of Cultural Studies, 26(1), 104–119.
McAllister, I. (2015). The personalization of politics in Australia. Party Politics, 21(3), 337–345.
Media Audit Finland (2020). KMT 2020 painettujen lehtien lukijamäärät. https://mediaauditfinland.fi/wp-content/uploads/2020/10/KMT_2020_lukijamaarat-painettu.pdf
Meeks, L. (2017). Getting personal: Effects of Twitter personalization on candidate evaluations. Politics & Gender, 13(1), 1–25.
Metz, M., Kruikemeier, S., & Lecheler, S. (2020). Personalization of Politics on Facebook: Examining the content and effects of professional, emotional and private self-personalization. Information, Communication & Society, 23(10), 1481–1498.
Oates, S., & Moe, W.W. (2018). Donald Trump and the “oxygen of publicity”: branding, social media and traditional media. In D.J. Schill & J.A. Hendricks (Eds.), The Presidency and Social Media: Discourse, Disruption, and Digital Democracy in the 2016 Presidential Election (pp. 209–235). Routledge.
Otto, L.P., Glogger, J., & Maier, M. (2018). Personalization 2.0? – Testing the personalization hypothesis in citizens’, journalists’, and politicians’ campaign Twitter communication. Communications, 44(4), 359–381.
Paatelainen, L., Croucher, S., & Benoit, B. (2016). A functional analysis of the Finnish 2012 presidential elections. Studies in Media and Communication, 4(2), 70–80.
Pain, P., & Chen, M.G. (2019). The president is in: Public opinion and the presidential use of Twitter. Social Media + Society, 5(2). https://doi.org/10.1177/2056305119855143
Parmelee, J.H., Perkins, S.C., & Beasley, B. (2023). Personalization of politicians on Instagram: What Generation Z wants to see in political posts. Information, Communication & Society, 26(9), 1773–1788. https://doi.org/10.1080/1369118X.2022.2027500
Rahat, G., & Kenig, O. (2018). From Party Politics to Personalized Politics? Party Change and Political Personalization in Democracies. Oxford University Press.
Salonen, M., Kannasto, E., & Paatelainen, L. (2021). Sosiaalisen median kommenttien analyysi multimodaalisesta näkökulmasta digitaalisen journalismin ja poliittisen viestinnän tutkimuksessa. Informaatiotutkimus, 40(3), 163–188. https://doi.org/10.23978/inf.111071
Shugart, M. (2001). Electoral “efficiency” and the move to mixed-member systems. Electoral Studies, 20(2), 173–193.
Šimunjak, M. (2018). From a leader-centred to a party-centred system? The curious case of media (de-)personalization in Yugoslavia and Croatia, 1945–2015. Europe-Asia Studies, 70(9), 1496–1514.
Smith, M., Ceni, A., Milic-Frayling, N., Shneiderman, B., Mendes Rodrigues, E., Leskovec, J., & Dunne, C. (2010). NodeXL: A free and open network overview, discovery and exploration add-in for Excel 2007/2010/2013/2016, http://nodexl.codeplex.com/ from the Social Media Research Foundation. http://www.smrfoundation.org
Small, T.A. (2017). Parties, leaders and online personalization: Twitter in Canadian electoral politics. In R. Davis, C. Holtz-Bacha, & M.R. Just (Eds.), Twitter and Elections Around the World: Campaigning in 140 Characters or Less (pp. 173–190). Routledge.
Stanyer, J. (2013). Intimate Politics: Publicity, Privacy and the Personal Lives of Politicians in Media-Saturated Democracies. Polity.
Tukiainen, J., Maliranta, M., Rönkkö, R., & Saari, J. (2023). Uusi polvi ja politiikan suunta – mitä nuoret ajattelevat yhteiskuntapolitiikasta? Labore, Reports 46.
Van Aelst, P., Sheafer, T., & Stanyer, J. (2012). The personalization of mediated political communication: A review of concepts, operationalizations and key findings. Journalism, 3(2), 203–220.
von Schoultz, Å., Järvi, T., & Mattila, M. (2020). Edustuksellisuuden henkilökohtainen ulottuvuus – puoluejohtajat ja ehdokkaat. In S. Borg, E. Kestilä-Kekkonen, & H. Wass (Eds.), Politiikan ilmastonmuutos: Eduskuntavaalitutkimus 2019 (pp. 169–195). Publications of the Ministry of Justice.
Vučković, M., & Oblak Črnič, T. (2020). Emotionalization and privatization of political communication on Facebook: Stimulating factors for citizens’ interactions? Media Studies, 11(22), 3–23.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/ms.2023.7.31-48
Date of publication: 2024-05-21 12:28:58
Date of submission: 2023-12-14 20:07:23
Statistics
Indicators
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Laura Paatelainen, Elisa Kannasto, Pekka Isotalus
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.