“I’m Not Afraid of Storms, for I’m Learning How to Sail My Ship.” Facets of Womanhood in Louisa May Alcott’s Little Women (1868)
Abstract
Louisa May Alcott’s Little Women (1868) is a timeless piece of writing about four sisters living in the late 19th-century Concord in America. Meg, Jo, Beth and Amy who, albeit raised within the boundaries of the same social setting, represent different facets of womanhood. Whereas Meg displays a traditional model of femininity from that time, Jo may be viewed as a rebellious tomboy combining both male and female features within her. Amy stands for artistically gifted women, while Beth exhibits the transcendent ideal of womanhood, which cannot be achieved. Since the types of femininity they represent differ, they are analysed separately to then be juxtaposed to highlight the differences between them. This paper proposes the analysis of the four sisters with respect to different facets of femininity they display. It uses intertextual practice to show the resemblance between the fates of the March girls and Alcott’s life. The comparative analysis proves that there is no universal answer to the question of what it means to be a woman as there are countless feminine types, which may partly overlap. By creating four March sisters, the representatives of distinct types of femininities, Alcott proves that every female is allowed to offer her own definition of femininity, depending on the ideals she represents.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Alcott, Louisa May. 2012a. Good Wives. London: Vintage Books.
Alcott, Louisa May. 2012b. Little Women. London: Vintage Books.
Bender, Clare. 2017. “Gender Stereotyping in Little Women: “Let Us Be Elegant or Die!”” Midwest Journal of Undergraduate Research 8: 140–53.
Blackford, Holly. 2011. “Chasing Amy: Mephistopheles, the Laurence Boy, and Louisa May Alcott’s Punishment of Female Ambition.” Frontiers: A Journal of Women Studies 32, no. 3: 1–40.
Cheever, Susan. 2011. Louisa May Alcott: A Personal Biography. New York: Simon & Schuster.
Curtis, David. 1968. “Little Women: A Reconsideration.” Elementary English 45, no. 7: 878–80.
Foote, Stephanie. 2005. “Resentful Little Women: Gender and Class Feeling in Louisa May Alcott.” College Literature 32, no. 1: 63–85.
Kent, Susan Kingsley. 1987. Sex and Suffrage in Britain, 1860-1914. Princeton University Press.
Murphy, Ann B. 1990. “The Borders of Ethical, Erotic, and Artistic Possibilities in Little Women.” Signs 15, no. 3: 562–85.
Nycz, Ryszard. 1990. “Intertekstualność i jej zakresy: teksty, gatunki, światy.” Pamiętnik Literacki: czasopismo kwartalne poświęcone historii i krytyce literatury polskiej 81, no. 2: 95–116.
Proehl, Kristen. 2014. “Sympathetic Jo: Tomboyism, Poverty, and Race in Louisa May Alcott’s Little Women.” Romantic Education in Nineteenth-Century American Literature, edited by Lesley Ginsberg and Monika M. Elbert, Taylor & Francis: 105–19.
Rudin, Shai. 2014. “The Hidden Feminist Agenda and Corresponding Edification in the Novel Little Women by Louisa May Alcott.” Childhood: A Study and Research in Children’s Culture 3: 115–132.
Rimmon-Kenan, Shlomith. 2002. Narrative Fiction: Contemporary Poetics (2nd ed.). New York: Routledge.
Smith, Shardai. 2021. “Dismantling Gender Roles and Redefining Womanhood in Louisa May Alcott's Little Women.” Locus: The Seton Hall Journal of Undergraduate Research 4, no. 12: 1–10.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/nh.2023.8.130-143
Date of publication: 2023-12-23 00:16:01
Date of submission: 2023-02-28 19:33:11
Statistics
Indicators
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2023 Aleksandra Wiktoria Sobczak, Patrycja Monika Rogala
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.