Three Models of Public Administration Reform and the Legitimacy of Civil Service

Mateusz Pszczyński

Abstract


Public administration is subject to permanent reforms, adapting its organization, tasks, approach to the needs and ideas of the modern world. At the same time, looking for the elements and forms that legitimize its functioning. Introduced reforms change the role and position of the civil service, affecting its legitimacy. Executive Management Model NPM affects the range of public benefits, and thus, indirectly, acceptance of a new model of public service. NPG model strengthens the position of the citizen in the process of setting public purpose, forces civil service to the negotiations, consensual activities while defining the public interest. In this way, a citizen deciding together with the public administration, accepts the public service activities and, at the same time, legitimizes them. The affirmation of the public service and its role in the performance of state tasks strengthens its position in the state and, thus, indirectly influences the legitimacy level of the civil service.


Keywords


new public governance; new public management; neo-Weberian state; legitimization; civil service

Full Text:

PDF (Język Polski)

References


Christensen T., Lægreid P., Transcending New Public Management. The Transformation of Public Sector Reforms, Aldershot 2009.

Loffler E., Governance: Network with stakeholders, [w:] T. Bovaird, E. Loffler, Public Management and Governance, London–New York 2007.

Lynn L.E., What is a Neo-Weberian State? Reflections on a Concept and its Implications, www.researchgate.net/publication/268398484_What_Is_a_Neo-Weberian_State_Reflections_on_a_Concept_and_Its_Implications [dostęp: 10.11.2017].

McLoughlin C., When Does Service Delivery Improve the Legitimacy of a Fragile or Conflict-Affected State?, “Governance: An International Journal of Policy, Administration, and Institutions” 2015, Vol. 28(3), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1111/gove.12091.

Pollitt C., Bouckaert G., Public Management Reform: A Comparative Analysis – New Public Management, Governance, and the Neo-Weberian State, Oxford 2011.

Randma-Liiv T., New Public Management versus Neo-Weberian State in Central and Eastern Europe, “The NISPAcee Journal of Public Administration and Policy” 2008, No. 1.

Scharpf F.W., Economic integration, democracy and the welfare state, “Journal of European Public Policy” 1997, Vol. 4(1), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1080/135017697344217.

The Civil Service in the 21st Century: Comparative Perspectives, eds. J. Raadschelders, T. Toonen, F. Van der Meer, Frits M. Van der Meer, London 2007, DOI: https://doi.org/10.1057/9780230593084.

Wesołowski W., Weberowska koncepcja legitymizacji: ograniczenia i kontynuacje, [w:] Legitymacja: klasyczne teorie i polskie doświadczenia, red. A. Rychard, Warszawa 1988.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/g.2017.64.2.61
Date of publication: 2018-02-26 19:27:24
Date of submission: 2017-09-16 00:03:38


Statistics


Total abstract view - 2246
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF (Język Polski) - 1661

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018 Mateusz Pszczyński

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.