Masquer
Afficher tout
Envoyer cet article par courriel E-textes ou p-textes? Les preuves des tâches de compréhension écrite pour les adolescents polonais apprenant l’anglais
Résumé
L'article contient uniquement les résumés en anglais.
Mots-clés
Texte intégral :
PDF (English)Références
Ackerman, R., & Lauterman, T. (2012). Taking Reading Comprehension Exams on Screen or on Paper? A Metacognitive Analysis of Learning Texts under Time Pressure. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1816–1828.
Ball, R., & Hourcade J. P. (2011). Rethinking Reading for Age From Paper and Computers. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 27(11), 1066–1082.
Chen, G., Cheng, W., Chang, T., Zheng, X., & Huang, R. (2014). A Comparison of Reading Comprehension across Paper, Computer Screens, and Tablets: Does Tablet Familiarity Matter? Journal of Computer Education, 1(2–3), 213–225.
Davoudi, M. (2005). Inference Generation Skill And Text Comprehension. The Reading Matrix, 5(1), 106-123.
Dillon, A. (1992). Reading from Paper versus Screens: A Critical Review of the Empirical Literature. Ergonomics, 35(10), 1297–1326.
Dundar, H., & Akcayir, M. (2012). Tablet vs. Paper: The Effect on Learners' Reading Performance. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4(3), 441-450.
Gudinavicius, A. (2016). Towards Understanding the Differences between Reading on Paper and Screen: Measuring Attention Changes in Brain Activity. Libellarium 9(1), 175-184.
Hosseini, M., Abidin M., & Baghdarnia, M. (2014). Comparability of Test Results of Computer Based Tests (CBT) and Paper and Pencil Tests (PPT) among English Language Learners in Iran. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 659-667.
Hou, J., Rashid, J. & Lee, K. M. (2017). Cognitive Map or Medium Materiality? Reading on Paper and Screen. Computers in Human Behavior 67, 84-94.
Jeong, H. (2010). A Comparison of the Influence of Electronic Books and Paper Books on Reading Comprehension, Eye Fatigue, and Perception. The Electronic Library, 30(3), 390-408.
Kong, Y., Seo, Y. S. & Zhai, L. (2018), Comparison of Reading Performance on Screen and on Paper: A Meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 123, 138–149.
Mangen, A., Walgermo, B., & Bronnick, K. (2013), Reading Linear Texts on Paper versus Computer Screen: Effects on Reading Comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 58, 61–68.
Margolin, S., Driscoll, C., Toland, M., & Kegler, J. L. (2013), E-readers, Computer Screens, or Paper: Does Reading Comprehension Change Across Media Platforms? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 512-519.
Mayes, D., Sims, V., & Koonce, J. (2001). Comprehension and Workload Differences for VDT and Paper-based Reading. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 28(6), 367–378.
Meyer, B., Talbot, A., Subblefield, R., & Poon, L. (1998). Interests and Strategies of Young and Old Readers Differentially Interact with Characteristics of Texts. Educational Gerontology, 24, 747–771.
Mojarrad, H., Hemmati, F., Gohar, M., & Sadeghi, A. (2013). Computer-Based Assessment (CBA) vs. Paper/Pencil-Based Assessment (PPBA): An Investigation into the Performance and Attitude of Iranian EFL Learners' Reading Comprehension. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 4(4), 418-428.
Myrberg, C., & Wiberg, N. (2015). Screen vs. Paper: What is the Difference for Reading and Learning? Insights, 28(2), 49-54.
Noyes, J., & Garland, K. (2008). Computer- vs. Paper-based Tasks: Are They Equivalent? Ergonomics, 51(9), 1352–1375.
Porion, A., Aparicio, X., Megalakaki O., Robert, A., & Baccino T. (2016). The Impact of Paper-Based versus Computerized Presentation on Text Comprehension and Memorization. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 569-576.
Schneps, M., Thomson, J., Chen, C., Sonnert, G., & Pomplun M. (2013), E-Readers are More Effective than Paper for some with Dyslexia. PLOS One, 8(9), 1-9.
Sun, S., Shieh, C., & Huang K. (2013), A Research on Comprehension Differences between Print and Screen Reading. SAJEMS Special Issue, 16, 87-101.
Walsch, G. (2016). Screen and Paper Reading Research – A Literature Review. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 47(3), 160-173
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/lsmll.2019.43.4.127-146
Date of publication: 2019-12-30 00:00:00
Date of submission: 2019-04-30 09:23:12
Statistiques
Indicateurs
Renvois
- Il n'y a présentement aucun renvoi.
Droit d'auteur (c) 2020, Klaudia Emanuela Gąsior
Ce(tte) œuvre est mise à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.