Determinants of political stability: explanation of the process of institutional change in post-communist countries (1990-2020)

Vitalii Lebediuk

Abstract


This article examines the institutional changes in 22 post-communist countries during the 1990-2020 period. The objective of the study was to find out why some countries achieved democracy while others failed to establish or strengthen democratic institutions, and what factors influenced the political stability of post-communist countries. During the study, available statistical information on the functioning of the main institutions was collected and processed. The analysis shows that the most significant institutional changes were observed among the non-democratic countries and those that fell into the category of hybrid political regimes. The correction of the initially chosen form of government is evidence in support of the theory of endogenous change, indicating “path-dependency”. The influence of endogenous factors determines the quality of democratic change and the level of political stability in post-communist countries. Democratic changes in the countries of Central and Eastern Europe were associated with a commitment to rapid reform in the early stages, and Euro-Atlantic integration only supported the democratic quality of the institutions. The institutional framework of the countries, that embarked on the path of European integration, was relatively stable during the period under the study, and did not deal with changes in the system of power distribution. While the countries of the former Soviet Union most often resorted to changes in the primary law of the country, and these changes were related to the redistribution of powers between the branches of power and the extension of the time in the office of the President. In addition to the overall level of democratization of the country, the level of emancipatory values and the weight of presidential power have the greatest impact on political stability.


Keywords


post-communist countries, democratization, political system, electoral system, party system, political stability

Full Text:

PDF (Język Polski)

References


Acemoglu D., Robinson, J.A., Social origins of democracy and dictatorship, New York 2006, s. 592.

Armingeon K., Careja R., Comparative Data Set for 28 Post-Communist Countries, 1989-2007, Zurich 2007.

Armingeon K., Careja R., Institutional Change and Stability in Postcommunist Countries 1990-2002, “European Journal of Political Research” 2008, Vol. 47, № 4.

Baluk W., Europa Środkowa i Wschodnia w okresie poszukiwania własnej tożsamości politycznej oraz zmian systemowych, „Rocznik Instytutu Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej” 2019, Vol. 17, № 1.

Bennett A., Colin E., Complex Causal Relations and Case Study Methods: The Example of Path Dependence, “Political Analysis” 2006, Vol. 14, № 3.

Duda R., Rola koncepcji «path dependence» w wyjaśnianiu efektywności transformacji w państwach Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej, „Rocznik Instytutu Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej” 2019, Vol. 17, № 1.

Ekiert G., Democracy in the Post-Communist World: An Unending Quest?, “East European Politics and Societies” 2007, Vol. 21, № 7.

Fish M.S., The determinants of economic reform in the post-communist world, “East European Politics and Societies” 1998, Vol. 12, № 1.

Gill G., Democracy and post-communism : political change in the post-communist world, New York 2002, s. 272.

Golosov G., Party system classification: A methodological inquiry, “Party Politics” 2011, Vol. 17, № 5.

Grzymala-Busse A., Pauline J.L., Reconceptualizing the State, Lessons from Post-Communism, “Politics and Society” 2002, Vol. 30, № 4.

Grzymala-Busse A., The programmatic turnaround of communist successor parties in East Central Europe, 1989–1998, “Communist and Post-Communist Studies” 2002, Vol. 35, № 1.

Hall P.A., Taylor C.R., Political science and the four new institutionalism, “Political Studies” 1996, Vol. 44, № 5.

Havrylyshyn O., Meng X., Tupy L.M., 25 Years of Reforms in Ex‐Communist Countries: Fast and Extensive Reforms Led to Higher Growth and More Political Freedom, “Cato Institute. Policy Analysis” 2016, № 795.

Hellman J.S., Winners Take All. The Politics of Partial Reform in Post-Communist Transitions, “World Politics” 1998, Vol. 50.

Inglehart R., East European value systems in global perspective, [w:] Democracy and Political Culture in Eastern Europe, red. H.-D. Klingemann, D. Fuchs and J. Zielonka, Routledge 2006, s. 67-85.

Inglehart R., Mapping Global Values, [w:] Measuring and Mapping Cultures: 25 Years of Comparative Value Surveys, red. Y. Esmer and T. Pettersson, Brill 2007, s. 11-32.

Inglehart R., Welzel C., Modernization, Cultural Change, and Democracy, New York 2005, s. 344.

Kopstein J., Postcommunist democracy - Legacies and outcomes, “Comparative Politics” 2003, Vol. 35, № 2. s. 231.

Krouwel A., Measuring Presidentialism of Central and East European Countries, “Working Papers Political Science” 2003, № 2.

Lane J.-E., Ersson S., The New Institutional Politics : Performance and Outcomes, London 2000, s. 329.

Lankina T., Libman A., Obydenkova A., Authoritarian and democratic diffusion in post-communist regions, “Comparative Political Studies” 2016, Vol. 49, № 12.

Lebediuk W., Transformacja systemów partyjnych w krajach postradzieckich, 1992−2019, “Rocznik Instytutu Europy Środkowo-Wschodniej” 2019, Vol. 17, № 1.

Lijphart A., Patterns of Democracy. Government Forms and Performance in Thirty-Six Countries, New Haven 1999, s. 368.

Linz J., Stepan A., Problems of democratic transition and consolidation: Southern Europe, South America and post-communist Europe, Baltimore 1996, s. 504.

Mainwaring S., Introduction: Party Systems in Latin America, [w:] Building Democratic Institutions: Party Systems in Latin America, red. S. Mainwaring and R. Timothy, Stanford 1995, s. 22-28.

March J.G., Olsen J.P., The new institutionalism: Organizational factors in political life, “American Political Science Review” 1984, Vol. 78, № 3.

Medina L., Schneider F.G., Shadow Economies Around the World: What Did We Learn Over the Last 20 Years?, “Working Paper” 2018, № 18/17.

Mishler W., Richard R., Trajectories of fear and hope: Support for democracy in post-communist Europe, “Comparative Political Studies” 1996, Vol. 28, № 4.

Moe T.M., Power and political institutions, “Perspectives on Politics” 2005, Vol. 3, № 2.

North D., Institutions, Institutional Change, and Economic Performance, Cambridge 1990, s. 164.

O’Donnell G., Schmitter P., Transition from authoritarian rule: Tentative conclusions about uncertain democracies, Baltimore 1989, s. 96.

Page S., Path Dependence, “Quarterly Journal of Political Science” 2006, Vol. 1, № 1.

Pierson P., Politics in Time: History, Institutions, and Social Analysis, Princeton 2004, s. 208.

Przeworski A., Institutions matter?, “Government and Opposition” 2004, Vol. 39, № 4.

Rae D., A note on the fractionalization of some European party systems, “Comparative Political Studies” 1968, Vol. 1, № 3.

Ross M., Does oil hinder democracy?, “World Politics” 2001, Vol. 53, № 3.

Sokół W., Geneza i ewolucja systemów wyborczych w państwach Europy Środkowej i Wschodniej, Lublin 2007, s. 676.

Taagepera R., Mapping the Indices of Seats – Votes Disproportionality and Inter-Election Volatility, “Party Politics” 2003, Vol. 9, № 6.

Welzel C., Are Levels of Democracy Affected by Mass Attitudes? Testing Attainment and Sustainment Effects on Democracy, “International Political Science Review” 2007, Vol. 28, № 4.

Welzel C., Inglehart R., Agency, Values, and Well-Being: A Human Development Model, “Social Indicators Research” 2010, Vol. 97.

Źródła internetowe

Corruption Perceptions Index, https://www.transparency.org/en/cpi, inf. 17 XII 2020.

Freedom House, https://freedomhouse.org/, inf. 18 XII 2020.

Freedom House, https://freedomhouse.org/report/nations-transit, “Nations in Transit 2019”, inf. 18 XII 2020.

Index of Economic Freedom, https://www.heritage.org/index/, inf. 16 XII 2020.

International Institute for Democracy and Electoral Assistance (IDEA), https://www.idea.int/datatools/data/voter-turnout, inf. 18 XII 2020.

Parline/Inter-Parliamentary Union, https://data.ipu.org/, “Parliamentary elections”, inf. 15 XII 2020.

Stockholm International Peace Research Institute (SIPRI), https://www.sipri.org/databases, inf. 10 XII 2020.

United Nations Development Programme, http://hdr.undp.org/, inf. 16 XII 2020.

World Development Indicators, https://databank.worldbank.org/source/world-development-indicators, inf. 16 XII 2020.

World Values Survey, http://www.worldvaluessurvey.org/wvs.jsp, “Online Data Analysis”, inf. 14 XII 2020.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/we.2021.7.1.13-43
Date of publication: 2021-10-06 12:27:12
Date of submission: 2021-01-28 13:40:14


Statistics


Total abstract view - 2787
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF (Język Polski) - 0

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021 Witalij Lebediuk

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.