Clientelism in the electoral process as a manifestation political corruption. Case of Ukraine

Yevheniya Yuriychuk, Dmytro Antoniuk

Abstract


Authors consider political corruption and clientelism in the electoral process as destructive phenomena that violate the normal principle of society and artificially create obstacles within the political system. The understanding of clientelism by different authors as a component of political corruption, the conditions of its existence, as well as the consequences and influence on political power
are analysed. Basing on the achievements of foreign scientists, the content and the essence of the concept of “electoral clientelism” is determined, the main reasons and preconditions of this phenomenon emergence are found, the authors’ own definition, summarizing the known scientific approaches, is offered. The devastating impact of clientelism on the electoral process that results in violating the principle of competition between political forces, and further leads to the development of corruption in the power system, is elucidated. Varieties of electoral clientelism in accordance with the tasks set by corrupt subjects of the electoral process in order to gain an advantage over opponents during the voting are found out. Apart from the approach, where electoral clientelism provides material benefits to voters, an approach, where the voters are constantly informed of the clientele character data, basing on which the unfair politicians create a mobilization campaign, is considered. The authors showed their own
vision of the connection between electoral clientelism and political corruption manifested in the occupation of political positions by ineffective candidates and further use of their powers for private purposes, which will threaten the long-term prospects of social development. A number of ways to regulate
clientelism’s impact on the electoral process, in particular through electronic voting introduction, established compulsory voting, agitation campaign financing control, severe penalties for clientele activity etc., are traced.


Keywords


political corruption, clienteleism, electoral clienteleism, bribe of voters

Full Text:

PDF

References


Amundsen I., Political corruption, Bergen 2006, https://www.u4.no/publications/political-corruption.pdf, inf. 20.04.2021.

Birch S., Nomenklatura democratization: Electoral clientelism in post soviet Ukraine, “Democratization” 1997, vol. 4(4), pp. 40–62.

Britannica, Clientelism, https://www.britannica.com/topic/clientelism, inf. 22.05.2020.

Chernivtsi: Chynnyy deputat misʹkrady, yakyy ye pidsudnym u spravi pro pidkup vybortsiv, znovu balotuyetʹsya v deputaty. 28 veresnya 2020, https://www.oporaua.org/news/vybory/mistsevi-vybory/mistsevi_2020/21027-chernivtsi-chinnii-deputat-miskradi-iakii-ie-pidsudnim-u-spravi-pro-pidkup-vibortsiv-znovu-balotuietsia-v-deputati/, inf. 29.04.2021.

Code of Good Practice in Electoral Matters, Opinion No. 190/2002, Venice Commission, https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL-AD(2002)023rev2-cor-e, inf. 29.04.2021.

Code of Good Practice on Referendums, Opinion No. 190/2002, Venice Commission, https://www.venice.coe.int/webforms/documents/?pdf=CDL-AD(2007)008rev-cor-e, inf. 29.04.2021.

Departament komunikatsiyi MVS Ukrayiny. Selfi v kabinkakh dlya holosuvannya z byuletenyamy – porushennya: MVS nahaduye pro tayemnytsyu holosuvannya, https://mvs.gov.ua/uk/press-center/news/Selfi_v_kabinkah_dlya_golosuvannya__porushennya_Zakonu_U_MVS_nagadali_pro_tamnicyu_golosuvannya_19196, inf. 29.04.2021.

Departament stratehichnykh rozsliduvanʹ Natsionalʹnoyi politsiyi Ukrayiny. 15-ho zhovtnya 2020. Ihor Klymenko: V Odesi politsiya vykryla «sitku» pidkupu vybortsiv, https://mvs.gov.ua/uk/press-center/news/Igor_Klimenko_V_Odesi_policiya_vikrila_sitku_pidkupu_viborciv_35135 inf. 29.04.2021.

Departament stratehichnykh rozsliduvanʹ Natsionalʹnoyi politsiyi Ukrayiny. U Kyyevi politsiya vykryla osib v orhanizatsiyi «sitky» pidkupu vybortsiv, https://mvs.gov.ua/uk/press-center/news/U_Kivi_policiya_vikrila_osib_v_organizacii_sitki_pidkupu_viborciv_35408, inf. 29.04.2021.

Fukuyama F., What is Corruption? https://www.gov.uk/government/publications/against-corruption-a-collection-of-essays/against-corruption-a-collection-of-essays#francis-fukuyama-what-is-corruption, inf. 19.04.2021.

Kodeks Ukrayiny pro administratyvni pravoporushennya № 80731 (statti 1 - 212-24) https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/80731-10#Text.

Kokhan H., Politychna koruptsiia yak naslidok konfliktu mizh derzhavoiu ta suspilstvom, “Naukovi zapysky [Instytutu politychnykh i etnohrafichnykh doslidzhen im. I. F. Kurasa]” 2008, № 42. s. 173–181.

Kramon E., Money for Votes: The Causes and Consequences of Electoral Clientelism in Africa, Cambridge 2017.

Kryminalʹnyy kodeks Ukrayiny vid 5 kvitnya 2001 roku № 2341-III, https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/2341-14#Text, inf. 29.04.2021.

Kushnarov I., Politychna koruptsiia: porivnialno politolohichna kontseptualizatsiia, Kyiv 2018.

Mares I., Muntean A., Petrova T., Economic Intimidation in Contemporary Elections: Evidence from Romania and Bulgaria, “Government and Opposition” 2016, vol. 53(3), pp. 486–517.

Mares I., Young L.E., The Core Voter’s Curse: Clientelistic Threats and Promises in Hungarian Elections, “Comparative Political Studies” 2018, vol. 51(11), pp. 1441–1471, DOI: 10.1177/0010414018758754.

Muñoz P., Buying Audiences: Clientelism and Electoral Campaigns When Parties Are Weak, Cambridge 2018.

MVS Ukrayiny. 26 oktyabrya 2020 h. #MistseviVybory2020: Za denʹ holosuvannya politseysʹki vidkryly 159 kryminalʹnykh provadzhenʹ za faktamy porushenʹ pid chas vyboriv. 26 zhovtnya 2020 r. https://www.facebook.com/mvs.gov.ua/photos/pcb.3444951765591490/3444951392258194, inf. 29.04.2021.

Kodeks Ukrayiny pro administratyvni pravoporushennya № 80731 (statti 1 - 212-24) https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/80731-10#Text.

Nevmerzhytskyi Y., Politychna koruptsiia: sutnist, zmist, mekhanizmy protydii, “Pravo Ukrainy” 2008, № 7, s. 123–130.

Nichter S., Votes for Survival: Relational Clientelism in Latin America, Cambridge 2018.

Parliamentary Assembly, Resolution 1897, https://assembly.coe.int/nw/xml/XRef/Xref-XML2HTML-en.asp?fileid=19121〈=en, inf. 29.04.2021.

Politolohichnyi entsyklopedychnyi slovnyk, red. Y. Shemshuchenko, V. Babkin, V. Horbatenko, Kyiv 2004.

Politychna koruptsiia perekhidnoi doby, red. S. Kotkin, A. Shaio, Kyiv 2004.

Szwarcberg M., Mobilizing Poor Voters: Machine Politics, Clientelism, and Social Networks in Argentina, Cambridge 2015.

Tinkov A., Politychna koruptsiia v systemi derzhavnoho upravlinnia: ukrainski realii, “Visnyk Natsionalnoi akademii derzhavnoho upravlinnia pry Prezydentovi Ukrainy” 2010, № 1. s. 227–234.

U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre, Clientelism, https://www.u4.no/terms#clientelism, inf. 29.04.2021.

U4 Anti-Corruption Resource Centre, Political corruption, https://www.u4.no/terms#political-corruption, inf. 24.02.2020.

Ukrinform. 29.07.2016 14:42. Chorna bukhhalteriya: Naybilʹshe «rehionaly» vytratylysya na vybory-2012 – ZMI, https://www.ukrinform.ua/rubric-polytics/2058674-corna-buhgalteria-najbilse-regionali-vitratilisa-na-vibori2012-zmi.html, inf. 29.04.2021.

Viddil komunikatsiyi politsiyi Chernivetsʹkoyi oblasti. 8-ho zhovtnya 2020. Na Bukovyni politsiya rozsliduye ymovirnyy pidkup vybortsiv, https://mvs.gov.ua/uk/press-center/news/Na_Bukovini_policiya_rozslidu_ymovirniy_pidkup_viborciv_34910, inf. 29.04.2021.

Viddil komunikatsiyi politsiyi Kyyivsʹkoyi oblasti. 24-ho zhovtnya 2020. Politsiya Kyyivshchyny vstanovyla osobu cholovika, yakyy u misti Boryspilʹ orhanizuvav merezhu pidkupu vybortsiv, https://mvs.gov.ua/uk/press-center/news/Policiya_Kiivshchini_vstanovila_osobu_cholovika_yakiy_u_misti_Borispil_organizuvav_merezhu_pidkupu_viborciv_35486, inf. 29.04.2021.

Viddil komunikatsiyi politsiyi Mykolayivsʹkoyi oblasti. 22-ho zhovtnya 2020. Politsiya vidkryla kryminalʹne provadzhennya shchodo mozhlyvoho pidkupu vybortsiv u Mykolayevi, https://mvs.gov.ua/uk/press-center/news/Policiya_vidkrila_kriminalne_provadzhennya_shchodo_mozhlivogo_pidkupu_viborciv_u_Mikolavi_35384, inf. 29.04.2021.

Vyborchyy kodeks Ukrayiny vid 19 hrudnya 2019 r. № 396-IX, https://zakon.rada.gov.ua/laws/show/396-20#Text.

You J. S., Democracy, Inequality and Corruption: Korea, Taiwan and the Philippines Compared, Cambridge 2015.

Za materialamy slidchoho upravlinnya politsiyi Kirovohradsʹkoyi oblasti. 24-ho zhovtnya 2020. Na Kirovohradshchyni pravookhorontsi vykryly merezhu pidkupu vybortsiv, https://mvs.gov.ua/uk/press-center/news/Na_Kirovogradshchini_pravoohoronci_vikrili_merezhu_pidkupu_viborciv_35495, inf. 29.04.2021.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/we.2021.7.1.101-118
Date of publication: 2021-10-06 12:27:20
Date of submission: 2021-10-04 10:30:19


Statistics


Total abstract view - 1719
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF - 0

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2021

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.