"Princeps educatus" in the Thought of John of Salisbury

Lech Dubel

Abstract


The Middle Ages was the era of the duality of power. The concept and understanding of power was dynamic at that time. The issue looked different in the early Middle Ages and different in the medieval period of “the enlightenment”. In this situation, the rational or rationalizing arguments were supported by both proponents of the papalistic vision of the state, as well as the supporters of the concept of autonomous secular authority. It must be borne in mind that at the time of John of Salisbury (c. 1115–1180), the State was confessional, the difference between the sacred and the profane was only just intuitively perceived and was part of a long and complex process, which in a sense, ended upon the arrival of Niccolo Machiavelli’s definition of the State. John of Salisbury formulates the following opinions on the essence of power: Firstly, it is a vision of a sinless monarch. According to him, it is basically the only condition of the recognition of the ruler as a real prince (princeps). The opposite of this legitimate authority is a tyrant. The requiremen there is appropriate education. It has to be princeps educatus (litteratus). Secondly, it is the organic vision of the state in which the political body is governed by the head, which is the habitat of reason, which is only subject to the conscience or the clergy. The construction of the State reflects the wisdom of God, who created man “in his own image and likeness”. Therefore, the State is the reflection (expression) of humanity and its reasonable part. Thirdly, the particular parts of the State (its members) imitate the man and interact with one another. The two values which were earlier raised by St. Augustine: ordinis and pax can be ensured by reasonable and thus fair authority of a prince, which was already named as public authority by John of Salisbury. Fourthly, the authority of prince is exercised in protecting the law of God both by him and by his subjects, and its objective is the realisation of the common good. The implementation of the above objectives in practice is to be the result of certain rational guarantees which are formulated by John of Salisbury towards the authority of prince. 


Keywords


princeps; tyrant; law of nature; education of prince; counselling of priests; common good; independence of prince’s judgement; loyalty of officials

Full Text:

PDF

References


Aristotle, The Nicomachean Ethics, Warszawa 1956.

Aristotle, Politics, Warszawa 2002.

Baszkiewicz, J., Władza, Wrocław–Warszawa–Kraków 1999.

Dubel, L., Łuszczyńska, M., Jan z Salisbury i św. Tomasz z Akwinu o władzy godnej i niegodnej, [in:] Z. Władek et al. (red.), Księga życia i twórczości. Prawo, t. V, Księga pamiątkowa dedykowana Profesorowi Romanowi A. Tokarczykowi, Lublin 2013.

Dubel, L., Deontologia urzędnicza w ujęciu Jana z Salisbury, [in:] J. Justyński, A. Madeja (red.), Moralność i władza jako kategorie myśli politycznej, Warszawa 2011.

Dubel, L., Wprowadzenie, [in:] Policraticus albo o paplaninie dworaków i przekazach filozofów, Jan z Salisbury, Lublin 2008.

Eisenstadt, S.N, The Political System of Empires, New York 1969.

John of Salisbury, Policraticus albo o paplaninie dworaków i przekazach filozofów, Lublin 2008.

Łuszczyńska, M., Ubi ratio, ibiius. Doktryna prawna św. Tomasza z Akwinu, Lublin 2013.

Malarczyk, J., Wizerunek renesansowego władcy, „Annales UMCS. Sectio G” 1974, vol. XXI, nr 4.

Seidler, G.L. Notatki o racjonalizmie, Lublin 1998.

Szkiłądź, H., Bik, S., Pakosz, B., Szkiłądź, C. (red.), Słownik języka polskiego, t. III, Warszawa 1989.

Szlachta, B. Monarchia prawa. Szkice z historii angielskiej myśli prawnej do końca epoki Plantagenetów, Kraków 2001.

Sylwestrzak, A., Akwinaty cypryjski „monarcha chrześcijański”, [in:] A. Madeja (red.), Nam hoc natura aequum est…, Księga Jubileuszowa ku czci Profesora Janusza Justyńskiego w siedemdziesięciolecie urodzin, Toruń 2012.

Szymaniec, P, Koncepcje wolności religijnej. Rozwój historyczny i współczesny stan debaty w Zachodniej myśli polityczno-prawnej, Wrocław 2017.

Tokarski, J., (red.), Słownik Wyrazów Obcych PWN, Warszawa 1980.

Wittfogell, K.A., Władza totalna, Toruń 2002.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/g.2018.65.1.7
Date of publication: 2018-03-21 12:51:28
Date of submission: 2017-07-10 21:20:16


Statistics


Total abstract view - 2314
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF - 515

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2018

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.