Algorithmic Human Resources Management – Perspectives and Challenges

Łukasz Sienkiewicz


Theoretical background: Technology – most notably processes of digitalisation, the use of artificial in telligence, machine learning, big data and prevalence of remote work due to pandemic – changes the way organizations manage human resources. One of the increasing trends is the use of so-called “algorithmic management”. It is notably different than previous e-HRM or HRIS (human resources information systems) applications, as it automates HR-related duties. Algorithms, being autonomous computational formulae, are considered objective and mathematically correct decision-making mechanisms. Limiting human in volvement and oversight of the labour process might lead to serious ethical and managerial challenges. Many areas – previously being sole responsibility of managers (including HR managers), like employment relations, hiring, performance management, remuneration – are increasingly affected, or even taken over, by algorithmic management.

Purpose of the article: The purpose of this article is to review the development, perspectives and challenges (including possible biases and ethical considerations) of algorithmic human resources management. This novel approach is fuelled by the speeding processes of digitalisation, the use of artificial intelligence, big data and increased analytical capabilities and applications used by contemporary companies. Algorithms are formulas that autonomously make decisions based on statistical models or decision rules without human intervention. Therefore, the use of algorithmic HRM automates decision-making processes and duties of human resources managers, thereby limiting human involvement and oversight, which can have negative consequences for the organization.

Research methods: The article provides a critical literature review of theoretical sources and empirical evidence on the application of algorithmic human resources management practices. Scientific journals in the field of human resources management and technology applications have been reviewed, as well as research reports from academic institutions and renowned international organizations.

Main findings: Applications of algorithmic human resources management are an emerging field of study that is currently not extensively researched. Little is known about the scale of use as well as consequences of this more automated approach to manage human work. Scarce evidence suggests possible negative con sequences, including ethical concerns, biases leading to discriminatory decisions and adverse employees’ reactions to decisions based on algorithms. After the review of possible future developments and challenges connected to algorithmic HRM, this article proposed actions aimed at re-humanisation of the approach to managerial decision-making with the support of algorithms, ensuring transparency of the algorithms construction and functionalities, and increasing reliability and reduction of possible biases.


human resources management; HR analytics; algorithms; HRM ethics

Full Text:



Angrave, D., Charlwood, A., Kirkpatrick, I., Lawrence, M., & Stuart, M. (2016). HR and analytics: Why HR is set to fail the big data challenge. Human Resource Management Journal, 26, 1–11. doi:10.1111/1748-8583.12090.

Bassi, L. (2011). Raging Debates in HR Analytics. People & Strategy, 34(2).

Bassi, L., Carpenter, R., & McMurrer, D. (2010). HR Analytics Handbook: Report of the State of Knowledge. Amsterdam: Reed Business.

Cheng, M.M., & Hackett, R.D. (2021). A Critical Review of Algorithms in HRM: Definition, Theory and Practice, Human Resources Management Review, 31(1).

Davenport, T.H., Harris, J.G., & Morison, R. (2010). Analytics at Work. Smarter Decisions, Better Results. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

Duggan, J., Sherman, U., Carbery, R., & McDonnell, A. (2020). Algorithmic management and appwork in the gig economy: A research agenda for employment relations and HRM. Human Resources Management Journal, 30, 114–132.

Eurofound (2018). Automation, digitalisation and platforms: Implications for work and employment. Luxembourg: Publications Office of the European Union. Retrieved from

Eurofound and Cedefop (2020). European Company Survey 2019: Workplace practices unlocking employee potential, European Company Survey 2019 series, Publications Office of the European Union, Luxembourg.

European Survey of Enterprises on New and Emerging Risks (ESENER) (2019). Managing safety and health at work, European Risk Observatory Report, European Agency for Safety and Health at Work.

Fahey, L. (2009). Exploring “analytics” to make better decisions – the questions executives need to ask, Strategy & Leadership, 37(5).

Falletta, S. (2014). In Search of HR Intelligence: Evidence-Based HR Analytics Practices in High Performing Companies. People & Strategy, 36(4).

Fitz-enz, J. (2010). The New HR Analytics. Predicting the Economic Value of Your Company’s Human Capital Investments. New York: American Management Association.

Gal, U., Jensen, T.B., & Stein, M.K. (2020). Breaking the vicious cycle of algorithmic management: A virtue ethics approach to people analytics. Information & Organization, 30(2).

Greenwood, M. (2013). Ethical analyses of HRM: A review and research agenda. Journal of Business Ethics, 114, 355–366. doi:10.1007/s10551-012-1354.

Guszcza, J., Rahwan, I., Bible, W., Cebrian, M., & Katyal, V. (2018). Why we need to audit algorithms, Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from

Harris, J.G., Craig, E., & Light, D.A. (2011). Talent and analytics: new approaches, higher ROI. Journal of Business Strategy, 32(6).

HR Magazine. (2015). Should Companies Have Free Rein to Use Predictive Analytics? Retrieved from

Jarrahi, M.H., & Sutherland, W. (2019). Algorithmic Management and Algorithmic Competencies: Understanding and Appropriating Algorithms in Gig Work. In N. Taylor, C. Christian-Lamb, M. Martin, B. Nardi (Eds.), Information in Contemporary Society. iConference 2019. Lecture Notes in Computer Science, vol. 11420 (pp. 578–589). Cham: Springer.

Kapoor, B. (2010). Business Intelligence and Its Use for Human Resource Management. The Journal of Human Resource and Adult Learning, Vol. 6(2).

Lal, P. (2015). Transforming HR in the digital era. Human Resource Management International Digest, 23(3).

Levenson, A. (2011). Using Targeted Analytics to Improve Talent Decisions. People & Strategy, 34(2).

Mann, G., & O'Neil, C. (2016). Hiring algorithms are not neutral. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from

Newman, D.T., Fast, N.J., & Harmon, D.J. (2020). When eliminating bias isn’t fair: Algorithmic reductionism and procedural justice in human resource decisions. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 160, 149-167.

Pfeffer, J., & Sutton, R. (2006). Hard Facts, Dangerous Half-Truths and Total Nonsense: Profiting from Evidence Based Management. Boston: Harvard Business Press.

Rosenblat, A., & Stark, L. (2016). Algorithmic labor and information asymmetries: a case study of Uber’s drivers. International Journal of Communication, 10, 3758–3784.

Tambe, P., Cappelli, P., & Yakubovich, V. (2019). Artificial Intelligence in Human Resources Management: Challenges and a Path Forward. California Management Review, 61(4), 15-42.

Yu, H., Miao, C., Chen, Y., Fauvel, S., Li, X., & Lesser, V.R. (2017). Algorithmic management for improving collective productivity in crowdsourcing. Scientific Reports, 7(1), art. no. 12541.

Data publikacji: 2021-09-25 00:53:07
Data złożenia artykułu: 2021-06-14 12:46:54


Total abstract view - 1206
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF - 0



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2021 Łukasz Sienkiewicz

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.