Email this article 
Hide
Show all
Does the Sustainability of the Country Differentiate the ESG of Companies and How It Affects the Relationship between ESG and Firm Value? Evidence from the European Union
Abstract
Theoretical background: The paper draws on two relevant theories – stakeholder theory and institutional theory. Non-financial information on how the operations of a company impact its surroundings in environmental, social, and governance (ESG) areas is more and more important in terms of firm value and according to stakeholders theory positive relationship between these two is expected. However, although the research on the relationship between company ESG performance (ESGP) and firm value origins since the beginning of the 1970s, the authors document no conclusive results. Above is theorised to be conditioned by the role of institutions as they reflect a rational purpose that guides behaviours of entities toward certain ends.
Purpose of the article: Two aims were set in the study. First, to examine the impact of the sustainability level of the European Union (EU) Member States in the years 2012–2021 on ESGP of non-financial sectors stock companies. The second aim of the paper was to assess the country sustainability level as the factor differentiating the nature and the strength of ESGP impact on firm value of non-financial sectors stock companies listed on the regulated financial markets of EU Member States in the years 2012–2021.
Research methods: For the purpose of achieving set goals the study utilised two econometric models. Models were estimated using Panel Least Squares (PLS) regression with Fixed Effects (FE). Tobin’s Q proxied firm value, ESG scoring from Refinitiv proxied company ESGP. Global Sustainability Competitiveness Index (GSCI) from Solability was used as the measure of country sustainability. Company financial and ESG data was sourced from Refinitiv EIKON, while country data was accessed from Solability, Eurostat, Human Development Index and Transparency International.
Main findings: Countries of both low and high sustainability level impact company ESGP positively. However, almost twice as big influence of highly sustainable countries was noted for low ones. Research results documented ESG to impact firm value positively. An increase in ESG score of a company from the country with low sustainability level decreased its firm value and the opposite was noted in case of companies of countries with high sustainability level. Investors tend to value positively companies with good ESGP and strong nation-level institutions in the field of sustainability and to punish (i.e. with a lower valuation) firms from countries of poor sustainability, even if these entities reached unexceptionally good ESGP.
Keywords
Full Text:
PDFReferences
Aguilera, R.V., Rupp, D.E., Williams, C.A., & Ganapathi, J. (2007). Putting the S back in corporate social responsibility: A multilevel theory of social change in organizations. Academy of Management Review, 32, 1–8. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275678
Ahlström, H. (2019). Policy hotspots for sustainability: Changes in the EU regulation of sustainable business and finance. Sustainability, 11(2), 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/su11020499
Ahlström, H., & Monciardini, D. (2021). The regulatory dynamics of sustainable finance: Paradoxical success and limitations of EU reforms. Journal of Business Ethics, 177, 193–212. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-021-04763-x
Brammer, S., Jackson, G., & Matten, D. (2012). Corporate social responsibility and institutional theory: New perspectives on private governance. Socio-Economic Review, 10(1), 3–28. https://doi.org/10.1093/ser/mwr030
Cai, Y., Pan, C.H., & Statman, M. (2016). Why do countries matter so much in corporate social performance? Journal of Corporate Finance, 41, 591–609. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jcorpfin.2016.09.004
Campbell, J.L. (2007). Why would corporations behave in socially responsible ways? An institutional theory of corporate social responsibility. Academy of Management Review, 32(3), 1–12. https://doi.org/10.5465/amr.2007.25275684
Cheng, R., Kim, H., & Ryu, D. (2023). ESG performance and firm value in the Chinese market. Investment Analysts Journal, 54(1), 1–15. https://doi.org/10.1080/10293523.2023.2218124
Cornell, B., & Damodaran, A. (2020). Valuing ESG: Doing good or sounding good?. https://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=3557432; https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3557432
Crisóstomo, V.L., Fatima, S.F., & Felipe, C.V. (2011). Corporate social responsibility, firm value and financial performance in Brazil, Social Responsibility Journal, 7(2), 295–309. https://doi.org/10.1108/17471111111141549
Dixon, F. (2019). Sustainable finance. Cadmus Journal, 4(1), 47–64.
Dobrick, J., Klein, C., & Zwergel, B. (2023). Size bias in Refinitiv ESG data. Finance Research Letters, 55, 104014. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2023.104014
Dorfleitner, G., Utz, S., & Wimmer, M. (2018). Patience pays off – corporate social responsibility and long-term stock returns. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 8(2), 132–157. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2017.1403272
Duque-Grisales, E., & Aguilera-Caracuel, J. (2021). Environmental, social and governance (ESG) scores and financial performance of multilatinas: Moderating effects of geographic international diversification and financial slack. Journal of Business Ethics, 168(2), 315–334. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-019-04177-w
Durand, R.B., Koh, S., & Tan, P.L. (2013). The price of sin in the Pacific-Basin. Pacific-Basin Finance Journal, 21(1), 899–913. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.pacfin.2012.06.005
Dziawgo, D. (2019). Sustainable finance as a new financial investment model. Research Paper of Wroclaw University of Economics and Business, 63(2), 23–34. https://doi.org/10.15611/pn.2019.12.02
Eccles, R.G., Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2014). The impact of corporate sustainability on organizational processes and performance. Management Science, 60(11), 2835–2857. https://doi.org/10.1287/mnsc.2014.1984
Egorova, A.A., Grishunina, S.V., & Karminskya, A.M. (2022). The impact of ESG factors on the performance of information technology companies. Procedia Computer Science, 199, 339–345. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.procs.2022.01.041
Fatemi, A., Glaum, M., & Kaiser, S. (2018). ESG performance and firm value: The moderating role of disclosure. Global Finance Journal, 38, 45–64. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.gfj.2017.03.001
Ferrell, A., Liang, H., & Renneboog, L. (2016). Socially responsible firms. Journal of Financial Economics, 122(3), 585–606. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2015.12.003
Friede, G., Busch, T., & Bassen, A. (2015). ESG and financial performance: Aggregated evidence from more than 2000 empirical studies. Journal of Sustainable Finance & Investment, 5(4), 210–233. https://doi.org/10.1080/20430795.2015.1118917
Gawęda, A. (2021). Sustainability reporting: Case of European stock companies. European Journal of Sustainable Development, 10(4), 41–53. https://doi.org/10.14207/ejsd.2021.v10n4p41
Giannopoulos, G., Kihle, F.R.V., Elmarzouky, M., & Afzal, H.K.A.B.M. (2022). The ESG disclosure and the financial performance of Norwegian listed firms. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 15(6), 1–16. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm15060237
Gregory, R.P. (2021). Why ROE, ROA, and Tobin’s Q in regressions aren’t good measures of corporate financial performance for ESG criteria. https://ssrn.com/abstract=3775789; https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.3775789
Han, J., Hyun, J., & Jeongmin Y. (2016). Empirical study on relationship between corporate social responsibility and financial performance in Korea. Asian Journal of Sustainability and Social Responsibility, 1, 61–76. https://doi.org/10.1186/s41180-016-0002-3
Hong, H., & Kacperczyk, M. (2009). The price of sin: The effect of social norms on markets. Journal of Financial Economics, 93, 15–36. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jfineco.2008.09.001
Humphrey, J.E., Lee, D.D., & Shen, Y. (2012). The independent effects of environmental, social and governance initiatives on the performance of UK firms. Australian Journal of Management, 37(2), 135–151. https://doi.org/10.1177/0312896211410081
Ioannou, I., & Serafeim, G. (2012). What drives corporate social performance? The role of nation-level institutions. Journal of International Business Studies, 43, 834–864. https://doi.org/10.1057/jibs.2012.26
Jackson, G., & Apostolakou, A. (2010). Corporate social responsibility in Western Europe: An institutional mirror or substitute? Journal of Business Ethics, 94(3), 371–394. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-009-0269-8
Jacobs, B.W., Singhal, V.R., & Subramanian, R. (2010). An empirical investigation of environmental performance and the market value of the firm. Journal of Operations Management, 28(5), 430–441. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jom.2010.01.001
Janicka, M., Pieloch-Babiarz, A., & Sajnóg, A. (2020). Does short-termism influence the market value of companies? Evidence from EU countries. Journal of Risk and Financial Management, 13, 1–22. https://doi.org/10.3390/jrfm13110272
Jensen, M.C. (2001). Value maximization, stakeholder theory, and the corporate objective function. Journal of Applied Corporate Finance, 14(3), 8–21. https://doi.org/10.1111/j.1745-6622.2001.tb00434.x
Khan, M. (2019). Corporate governance, ESG, and stock returns around the world. Financial Analysts Journal, 75(4), 103–123. https://doi.org/10.1080/0015198X.2019.1654299
Khan, M. (2022). ESG disclosure and firm performance: A bibliometric and meta-analysis. Research in International Business and Finance, 61, 101668. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ribaf.2022.101668
Kuram, S., Sharma, D., Rao, S., Weng, M.L., & Mangla, S.K. (2022). Past, present, and future of sustainable finance: Insights from big data analytics through machine learning of scholarly research. Annals of Operations Research, 309(2), 1199–1205. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10479-022-04535-4
Lammers, J.C., & Garcia, M.A. (2017). Institutional theory approaches. In C.R. Scott, J.R. Barker, T. Kuhn, J. Keyton, P.K. Turner & L.K. Lewis (Eds.), The International Encyclopedia of Organizational Communication (pp. 195–216). John Wiley & Sons. https://doi.org/10.1002/9781118955567.wbieoc113
Liang, H., & Renneboog, L. (2017). On the foundations of corporate social responsibility. The Journal of Finance, 72(2), 853–910. https://doi.org/10.1111/jofi.12487
Limkriangkrai, M., Koh, S., & Durand, R.B. (2017). Environmental, social, and governance (ESG) profiles, stock returns, and financial policy: Australian evidence. International Review of Finance, 17(3), 461–471. https://doi.org/10.1111/irfi.12101
Marsat, S., & Williams, B. (2014). Does the market value social pillar? https://ssrn.com/abstract=2419387; https://doi.org/10.2139/ssrn.2419387
Mervelskemper, L., & Streit, D. (2017). Enhancing market valuation of ESG performance: Is integrated reporting keeping its promise? Business Strategy and the Environment, 26(4), 536–549. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.1935
Naffa, H., & Fain, M. (2022). A factor approach to the performance of ESG leaders and laggards. Finance Research Letters, 44, 102073. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102073
Orlitzky, M., Schmidt, F, & Rynes, S. (2003). Corporate social and financial performance: A meta-analysis. Organization Studies, 24(3), 403–441. https://doi.org/10.1177/0170840603024003910
Plumlee, M., Brown, D., Hayes, R.M., & Marshall, R.S. (2015). Voluntary environmental disclosure quality and firm value: Further evidence. Journal of Accounting and Public Policy, 34, 336–361. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.jaccpubpol.2015.04.004
Porter, M.E., & Kramer, M.R. (2018). Creating shared value: How to reinvent capitalism – and unleash a wave of innovation and growth. In G.G. Lenssen & N.C. Smith (Eds.), Managing Sustainable Business: An Executive Education Case and Textbook (pp. 323–346). Springer Netherlands. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-94-024-1144-7_16
Samborski, A. (2024). ESG reporting as a corporate governance mechanism. The case of publicly listed energy companies. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, Sectio H – Oeconomia, 58(1), 169–183. https://doi.org/10.17951/h.2024.58.1.169-183
Scott, R.W. (1987). The adolescence of institutional theory. Administrative Science Quarterly, 32(4), 493–511. https://doi.org/10.2307/2392880
Solability. (2023, December 31). The Global Sustainable Competitiveness Index. https://solability.com/the-global-sustainable-competitiveness-index/the-index/downloads
Szewczuk, S., & Więcek-Janka, E. (2024).Exploring sustainable investment: In-depth analysis of socially responsible investing (SRI) and ESG strategies. Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Skłodowska, Sectio H – Oeconomia, 58(3), 103–114. https://doi.org/10.17951/h.2024.58.3.103-114
Velte, P. (2017). Does ESG performance have an impact on financial performance? Evidence from Germany. Journal of Global Responsibility, 80(2), 169–178. https://doi.org/10.1108/JGR-11-2016-0029
Wang, K., Yu, Y., Wang, X., & Zheng, H. (2023). Walk your reputation: The impact of corporate social responsibility decoupling on the hospitality and tourism firm value in the time of crisis. Tourism Economics, 30(6), 1580–1599. https://doi.org/10.1177/13548166231220286
Wong, W.C., Batten, J.A., Mohamed-Arshad, S.B., Nordin, S., & Adzis, A.A. (2021). Does ESG certification add firm value? Finance Research Letters, 39, 101593. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2020.101593
Xie, J., Nozawa, W., Yagi, M., Fujii, H., & Managi, S. (2019). Do environmental, social, and governance activities improve corporate financial performance? Business Strategy and the Environment, 28(2), 286–300. https://doi.org/10.1002/bse.2224
Yoo, S., & Managi, S. (2022). Disclosure or action: Evaluating ESG behaviour towards financial performance. Finance Research Letters, 44, 102108. https://doi.org/10.1016/j.frl.2021.102108
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/h.2024.58.4.7-23
Date of publication: 2024-10-26 13:51:59
Date of submission: 2024-02-23 14:24:22
Statistics
Indicators
Refbacks
- There are currently no refbacks.
Copyright (c) 2024 Adrian Gawęda
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.