E-texts or p-texts? Evidence from reading comprehension tasks for Polish teenage learners of English

Klaudia Emanuela Gąsior


Research investigating differences between reading comprehension of electronic and paper texts has so far provided conflicting evidence. Thus, the present paper aims to examine the impact of the text source on the quality of reading comprehension of Polish intermediate learners of English. In a pre-test the participants representing a similar level of this subskill were selected and divided into two groups. In the study proper, the control group read a paper version of the text while the treatment group did it using a computer screen. Although the participants’ results were better in the case of e-texts than of p-texts, these differences were not statistically significant.


reading comprehension; EFL reading; paper texts; electronic texts; secondary school students

Full Text:



Ackerman, R., & Lauterman, T. (2012). Taking Reading Comprehension Exams on Screen or on Paper? A Metacognitive Analysis of Learning Texts under Time Pressure. Computers in Human Behavior, 28, 1816–1828.

Ball, R., & Hourcade J. P. (2011). Rethinking Reading for Age From Paper and Computers. International Journal of Human-Computer Interaction, 27(11), 1066–1082.

Chen, G., Cheng, W., Chang, T., Zheng, X., & Huang, R. (2014). A Comparison of Reading Comprehension across Paper, Computer Screens, and Tablets: Does Tablet Familiarity Matter? Journal of Computer Education, 1(2–3), 213–225.

Davoudi, M. (2005). Inference Generation Skill And Text Comprehension. The Reading Matrix, 5(1), 106-123.

Dillon, A. (1992). Reading from Paper versus Screens: A Critical Review of the Empirical Literature. Ergonomics, 35(10), 1297–1326.

Dundar, H., & Akcayir, M. (2012). Tablet vs. Paper: The Effect on Learners' Reading Performance. International Electronic Journal of Elementary Education, 4(3), 441-450.

Gudinavicius, A. (2016). Towards Understanding the Differences between Reading on Paper and Screen: Measuring Attention Changes in Brain Activity. Libellarium 9(1), 175-184.

Hosseini, M., Abidin M., & Baghdarnia, M. (2014). Comparability of Test Results of Computer Based Tests (CBT) and Paper and Pencil Tests (PPT) among English Language Learners in Iran. Procedia - Social and Behavioral Sciences, 98, 659-667.

Hou, J., Rashid, J. & Lee, K. M. (2017). Cognitive Map or Medium Materiality? Reading on Paper and Screen. Computers in Human Behavior 67, 84-94.

Jeong, H. (2010). A Comparison of the Influence of Electronic Books and Paper Books on Reading Comprehension, Eye Fatigue, and Perception. The Electronic Library, 30(3), 390-408.

Kong, Y., Seo, Y. S. & Zhai, L. (2018), Comparison of Reading Performance on Screen and on Paper: A Meta-analysis. Computers & Education, 123, 138–149.

Mangen, A., Walgermo, B., & Bronnick, K. (2013), Reading Linear Texts on Paper versus Computer Screen: Effects on Reading Comprehension. International Journal of Educational Research, 58, 61–68.

Margolin, S., Driscoll, C., Toland, M., & Kegler, J. L. (2013), E-readers, Computer Screens, or Paper: Does Reading Comprehension Change Across Media Platforms? Applied Cognitive Psychology, 27, 512-519.

Mayes, D., Sims, V., & Koonce, J. (2001). Comprehension and Workload Differences for VDT and Paper-based Reading. International Journal of Industrial Ergonomics, 28(6), 367–378.

Meyer, B., Talbot, A., Subblefield, R., & Poon, L. (1998). Interests and Strategies of Young and Old Readers Differentially Interact with Characteristics of Texts. Educational Gerontology, 24, 747–771.

Mojarrad, H., Hemmati, F., Gohar, M., & Sadeghi, A. (2013). Computer-Based Assessment (CBA) vs. Paper/Pencil-Based Assessment (PPBA): An Investigation into the Performance and Attitude of Iranian EFL Learners' Reading Comprehension. International Journal of Language Learning and Applied Linguistics World, 4(4), 418-428.

Myrberg, C., & Wiberg, N. (2015). Screen vs. Paper: What is the Difference for Reading and Learning? Insights, 28(2), 49-54.

Noyes, J., & Garland, K. (2008). Computer- vs. Paper-based Tasks: Are They Equivalent? Ergonomics, 51(9), 1352–1375.

Porion, A., Aparicio, X., Megalakaki O., Robert, A., & Baccino T. (2016). The Impact of Paper-Based versus Computerized Presentation on Text Comprehension and Memorization. Computers in Human Behavior, 54, 569-576.

Schneps, M., Thomson, J., Chen, C., Sonnert, G., & Pomplun M. (2013), E-Readers are More Effective than Paper for some with Dyslexia. PLOS One, 8(9), 1-9.

Sun, S., Shieh, C., & Huang K. (2013), A Research on Comprehension Differences between Print and Screen Reading. SAJEMS Special Issue, 16, 87-101.

Walsch, G. (2016). Screen and Paper Reading Research – A Literature Review. Australian Academic & Research Libraries, 47(3), 160-173

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/lsmll.2019.43.4.127-146
Data publikacji: 2019-12-30 00:00:00
Data złożenia artykułu: 2019-04-30 09:23:12


Total abstract view - 485
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF - 246



  • There are currently no refbacks.

Copyright (c) 2020 Klaudia Emanuela Gąsior

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.