Un mélange conceptuel revisité: un cas des textes littéraires paraphrasés dans des publicités contemporaines
Résumé
Le numéro contient uniquement les résumés en anglais.
Mots-clés
Texte intégral :
PDF (English)Références
Bache, C. 2005. Constraining Conceptual Integration Theory. Levels of Blending and Disintegration. Journal of Pragmatics 37: 1615-1635.
Bralczyk, J. 2004. Język na sprzedaż. Gdańsk: Gdańskie Wydawnictwo Psychologiczne.
Brandt, L. 2013. The Communicative Mind: A Linguistic Exploration of Conceptual Integration and Meaning Construction. Newcastle upon Tyne: Cambridge Scholars Publishing.
Brandt, P. A. 2005. Mental Spaces and cognitive semantics: A critical comment. Journal of Pragmatics 37, 1578-1594.
Brandt, L. and P.A. Brandt. 2005. Making sense of a blend: A cognitive-semiotic approach to metaphor. Annual Review of Cognitive Linguistics 3, 216–249.
Cienki, A. 2008. Looking at analysis of mental spaces and blending/ Looking at and experiencing discourse in interaction. In: T. Oakley and A. Hougaard (eds.) Mental Spaces in Discourse and Interaction. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 235-245.
Coulson, S. and T. Oakley. 2000. Blending basics. Cognitive Linguistics 11(3/4): 175-196.
Dancygier, B. 2008. The text and the story: Levels of blending in fictional narratives. In: T. Oakley and A. Hougaard (eds.) Mental Spaces in Discourse and Interaction. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 51-78.
Fauconnier, G. 1994. Mental Spaces: Aspects of Meaning Construction in Natural Language.
Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Fauconnier, G. 1997. Mappings in Thought and Language. Cambridge and New York: Cambridge University Press.
Fauconnier, G. 2012. Ten Lectures on Cognitive Construction of Meaning. Beijing: Foreign Language Teaching and Research Press.
Fauconnier, G. and M. Turner. 1998. Conceptual Integration Networks. Cognitive Science 22 (2) : 133-187.
Fauconnier, G. and M. Turner. 2002. The Way We Think: Conceptual Blending and the Mind’s Hidden Complexities. New York: Basic Books.
Gajewska, E. 2011. Językowe gry nadawcy z odbiorcą we współczesnym dyskursie reklamy. In: Media i Społeczeństwo 1: 126-132.
Hart, C. 2007. Critical Discourse Analysis and Conceptualization: Mental Spaces, Blended Spaces and Discourse Spaces in the British National Party. In: C. Hart and D. Lukeš (eds.) Cognitive Linguistics in Critical Discourse Analysis. Newcastle: Cambridge Scholars Publishing. 107-131.
Hougaard, A. and T. Oakley. 2008. Mental spaces and discourse analysis. In: T. Oakley and A. Hougaard (eds.) Mental Spaces in Discourse and Interaction. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 1-26.
Kardela, H. 2007. ‘Good’ revisited: A mental space analysis. In: H. Kardela and A. Głaz (eds.) Further Insights into Semantics and Lexicography. Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Marii Curie-Skłodowskiej. 291-303.
Langacker, R. W. 1999. Grammar and Conceptualization. Berlin, New York: Mouton de Gruyter.
Langacker, R. W. 2001. Discourse in cognitive grammar. Cognitive Linguistics 12 (2): 143–188.
Li, B., Zook, A., Davis, N. and M. O. Riedl. 2012. Goal-Driven Conceptual Blending: A Computational Approach for Creativity. In: Proceedings of the 2012 International Conference on Computational Creativity, Dublin, Ireland. 3-16. Available online: www.cc.gatech.edu/~riedl/pubs/iccc12.pdf
Libura, A. 2010. Teoria przestrzeni mentalnych i integracji poje̜ciowej: struktura modelu i jego funkcjonalność. Wrocław: Wydawnictwo Uniwersytetu Wrocławskiego.
Liddell, S. K. 2003. Grammar, Gesture and Meaning in American Sign Language. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
Mierzwińska-Hajnos, A. and R. Augustyn. 2013. A note on the generic space: Do we really need it? Paper read at 12th International Cognitive Linguistics Conference, University of Alberta, Edmonton, Canada.
Oakley, T. and S. Coulson. 2008. Mental spaces and metaphoric language in discourse. In: T. Oakley and A. Hougaard (eds.) Mental Spaces in Discourse and Interaction. Amsterdam-Philadelphia: John Benjamins. 27-50.
Pascual, E. 2009. “I was in that room!”: Conceptual integration of content and context in a writer’s vs. a prosecutor’s description of a murder. In: V. Evans and S. Pourcel (eds.). New Directions in Cognitive Linguistics. Amsterdam: John Benjamins, 499-516.
Skinner, E. 1990. Advertising Fictions: Literature, Advertisement, and Social Reading (review). MFS Modern Fiction Studies 36 (2): 315-316
Sperber, D. and D. Wilson. 1995. Relevance: Communication and Cognition. Oxford: Blackwell.
Turner, M. 1996. The Literary Mind: the Origin of Thought and Language. New York: Oxford University Press.
Veale, T. and D. O'Donoghue. 2000. Computation and blending. Cognitive Linguistics 11, 253-281.
Wilson, D. and D. Sperber. 2012. Meaning and Relevance. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/lsmll.2016.40.1.65
Date of publication: 2016-07-27 14:57:58
Date of submission: 2016-04-01 23:55:54
Statistiques
Indicateurs
Renvois
- Il n'y a présentement aucun renvoi.
Droit d'auteur (c) 2016, Agnieszka Bożena Mierzwińska-Hajnos
![Licence Creative Commons](http://i.creativecommons.org/l/by/4.0/88x31.png)
Ce(tte) œuvre est mise à disposition selon les termes de la Licence Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International.