The Determinants of Remote Work in Poland – the Perspective of Employers

Zenon Pokojski, Marcin Lipowski

Abstract


Theoretical background: Remote work has been of interest to managers since the introduction of new information and communication technologies (ICT). In the initial period, it was treated as a privilege of the employee, which few deserve. Therefore, this type of work was not very popular. The COVID-19 pandemic period changed the attitude towards remote work, it became a necessity for many organizations. However, its use gave rise to many new problems, which both employers and employees had to face. Post-pandemic reality poses new challenges for those interested in its further use.

Purpose of the article: The aim of the article is to examine the attitude of employers to the five challenges related to remote work selected by the authors: the method of monitoring work, the level of employee support by employers, the assessment of work efficiency, work safety and data protection, and the intention to continue remote work after the pandemic.

Research methods: The research was carried out using the standardized questionnaire interviews based on the CATI method. The questionnaire used in the research contained 23 closed questions of single and multiple choice, as well as 7 metric questions, allowing to identify the size, type of business, age and the structure of the company’s ownership capital. The research was carried out in the period May–June 2021 on a population of 248 entrepreneurs divided into micro, small, medium and large companies.

Main findings: Remote work, in particular hybrid work, is likely to become more common in enterprises after the end of the pandemic crisis. Unfortunately, the provisions of labour law do not keep pace with the dynamics of changes in the organization of work in enterprises. Remote work poses new challenges for managers who have to deal with another, probably not yet well recognized management method. Therefore, it requires managers to develop new skills, a management style in the ICT environment oriented towards the results of work, and not time and workload. New tools for measuring work efficiency need to be developed. We also have to face the problem of trust, procrastination and many other new challenges. The model of remote work means the need to develop new internal procedures in the company, because this type of work requires a different organization of duties and tasks for employees with whom there is no physical contact. The challenge will be to strike a balance between a “tight” or “loose” organizational culture, known as “tight-loose ambidexterity”. It also seems that employers will have to assume a much larger range of responsibilities for this group of workers, ranging from a wide range of different training courses to financial support.


Keywords


remote work; effectiveness of remote work; support for remote work; remote work control; security of remote work

Full Text:

PDF

References


Allen, T.D., Golden, T.D., & Shockley, K.M. (2015). How effective is telecommuting? Assessing the status of our scientific findings. Psychological Science in the Public Interest, 16, 40–68. doi:10.1177/1529100615593273

Alton, L. (2017). Are Remote Workers More Productive Than In-Office Workers? Retrieved from https://www.forbes.com/sites/larryalton/2017/03/07/are-remote-workers-more-productive-than-in-office-workers/?sh=4b05d52c31f6

Baruch, Y. (2000). Teleworking: Benefits and pitfalls as perceived by professionals and managers. New Technology, Work and Employment, 15(1), 34–49. doi:10.1111/1468-005X.00063

Bąk, E. (2006). Elastyczne formy zatrudnienia. Warszawa: C.H. Beck.

Beckmann, M. (2016). Working-time autonomy as a management practice. Bonn: IZA World of Labor. doi:10.15185/izawol.230

Bloom, N., Liang, J., Roberts, J., & Ying, Z.J. (2015). Does working from home work? Evidence from a Chinese experiment. The Quarterly Journal of Economics, 130(1), 165–218. doi:10.1093/qje/qju032

Borissova, D., Dimitrova, Z., & Dimitrov, V. (2020). How to support teams to be remote and productive: Group decision-making for distance collaboration software tools. Information & Security, 46, 36–52. doi:10.11610/isij.4603

Carroll, N., & Conboy, K. (2020). Normalising the “new normal”: Changing tech-driven work practices under pandemic time pressure. International Journal of Information Management, 55, 102186. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102186

Carrotspot. (2021). Zaangażowanie w czasie pandemii. Wpływ COVID-19 i zdalnego trybu pracy na efektywność polskich firm. Badanie podłużne, cz. 2.

Curran, K. (2020). Cyber security and the remote workforce. Computer Fraud & Security, 6, 11–12. doi:10.1016/S1361-3723(20)30063-4

Deloitte Insight. (2021). The social enterprise in a world disrupted. Leading the shift from survive to thrive. Global Human Capital Trends.

Desilver, D. (2020). Working from home was a luxury for the relatively affluent before coronavirus – not any more. World Economic Forum, 21. Retrieved from https://www.weforum.org/agenda/2020/03/working-from-home-coronavirus-workers-future-of-work/

Di Martino, V., & Wirth, L. (1990). Telework: A new way of working and living. International Labour Review, 129, 529–554.

Dowling, M. (2012). Enabling remote working: Protecting the network Network Security, 3, 18–20. doi:10.1016/S1353-4858(12)70047-8

EY. (2021). Raport EY. Organizacja pracy w czasie pandemii. Wyzwania dla HR w 2021 roku. Praca hybrydowa – mierzenie efektywności – nowa polityka wynagrodzeń i świadczeń pozapłacowych. Raport z badania rynku pracy, 8.

Gajendran, R. (2017). Unlocking the promise of telecommuting. Business Today, 26, 190–192. Retrieved from https://www.businesstoday.in/magazine/features/story/unlocking-the-promise-of-telecommuting-64479-2016-12-26

Gelfand, M.(2019). Rule Makers, Rule Breakers: Tight and Loose Cultures and the Secret Signals That Direct Our Lives. New York: Scribner.

George, T.J., Atwater, L.E., Maneethai, D., & Madera, J.M. (2021). Supporting the productivity and wellbeing of remote workers: Lessons from COVID-19. Organizational Dynamics, 51(2), 100869. doi:10.1016/j.orgdyn.2021.100869

Groen, B.A.C., Van Triest, S.P., Coers, M., & Wtenweerde, N. (2018). Managing flexible work arrangements: Teleworking and output controls. European Management Journal, 36, 727–735. doi:10.1016/j.emj.2018.01.007

Hern, A.(2020). Covid-19 could cause permanent shift towards home working. The Guardian, 13. Retrieved from http://www.miamidadetpo.org/library/2020-03-13-uk-covid19-could-cause-permanent-shift-towards-home-working.pdf

Johnson, C. (2015). 20 reasons to let your employees work from home. Entrepreneur Europe. Retrieved from https://www.entrepreneur.com/article/253896

Kniffin, M., Narayanan, J., Anseel, F., Antonakis, J., Ashford, S.P., Bakker, A.B., & Vugt, M.V. (2021). COVID-19 and the workplace: Implications, issues, and insights for future research and action. American Psychologist, 76, 63–77. doi:10.1037/amp00007

Kossek, E.E., & Lautsch, B.A. (2018). Work-life flexibility for whom? Occupational status and work – life inequality, middle, and lower level jobs. Academy of Management Annals, 12, 5–36. doi:10.5465/annals.2016.0059

Kryczka, S. (2020). Praca zdalna pod kontrolą Państwowej Inspekcji Pracy. Warszawa: Wolters Kluwer. Retrieved from https://sip.lex.pl/komentarze-i-publikacje/poradniki/praca-zdalna-pod-kontrola-panstwowej-inspekcji-pracy-151371907

Lautsch, B.A., Kossek, E.E., & Eaton, S.C. (2009). Supervisory approaches and paradoxes in managing telecommuting implementation. Human Relations, 62, 795–827. doi:10.1177/0018726709104543

Leonardi, P.M. (2021). COVID-19 and the new technologies of organizing: digital exhaust, digital footprints, and artificial intelligence in the wake of remote work. Journal of Management Studies, 58(1), 249–253. doi:10.1111/joms.12648

Madlock, P.E. (2013). The influence of motivational language in the technologically mediated realm of telecommuters. Human Resource Management Journal, 23, 196–210.

Malecki, F. (2020). Overcoming the security risks of remote working. Computer Fraud & Security, 7, 10–12. doi:10.1016/S1361-3723(20)30074-9

Marasigan, D.P. (2020). The effectiveness of ‘work from home’ in a private service company. International Journal of Academe and Industry Research, 1, 1–25. Retrieved from https://ijair.iiari.org/media/345593-the-effectiveness-of-work-from-home-in-a-93a822df.pdf

Nurse, J.R., Williams, N., Collins, E., Panteli, N., Blythe, J., & Koppelman, B. (2021). Remote working pre- and post-COVID-19: an analysis of new threats and risks to security and privacy. In International Conference on Human–Computer Interaction (pp. 583–590). Cham: Springer. doi:10.1007/978-3-030-78645-874

Olson, M.H. (1983). Remote office work: Changing work patterns in space and time. Stern Working Paper Series, 26(3), 182–187. Retrieved from https://archive.nyu.edu/bitstream/2451/14621/1/IS-81-56.pdf

Parker, S.K., & Grote, G. (2020). Automation, algorithms, and beyond: Why work design matters more than ever in a digital world. Applied Psychology, 71(4), 1171–1204. doi:10.1111/apps.12241

Parker, S.K., Knight, C., & Keller, A. (2020). Remote Managers Are Having Trust Issues. Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from https://netfamilybusiness.com/wp-content/uploads/2020/08/Remote-Managers-Are-Having-Trust-Issues.pdf

Perry, S.J., Rubino, C., & Hunter, E.M. (2018). Stress in remote work: Two studies testing the demand–control–person model. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 27, 577–593. doi:10.1080/1359432X.2018.1487402

Popovici, V., & Lavinia-Popovici, A. (2020). Remote work revolution: Current opportunities and challenges for organizations. Ovidius University Annals, Economic Sciences Series, 1, 468–472.

Rayome, A.D. (2018). Why 65% of workers would be more productive working from home than the office? Tech Republic. Retrieved from https://www.techrepublic.com/article/why-65-of-workers-would-be-more-productive-working-from-home-than-the-office/

Richter, A. (2020). Locked-down digital work. Journal of Information Management, 55, 102157. doi:10.1016/j.ijinfomgt.2020.102157

Rupietta, K., & Beekmann, M. (2016). Working from home: What is the effect on employees’ effort? WWZ Working Paper, 07. Retrieved from https://www.econstor.eu/bitstream/10419/162183/1/889498229.pdf

Savage, M. (2021). What bosses really think about remote work. BBC. Hello Hybrid. Retrieved from https://www.bbc.com/worklife/article/20210908-what-bosses-really-think-about-remote-work

Spreitzer, G.M., Cameron, L., & Garrett, L. (2017). Alternative work arrangements: Two images of the new world of work. Annual Review of Organizational Psychology and Organizational Behavior, 4, 473–499. doi.10.1146/annurev-orgpsych-032516-113332

Sull, D., Sull, Ch., & Bersin, J. (2020). Five ways leaders can support remote work. MIT Sloan Management Review, 61, 1–10.

Sytch, M., & Greer, L.L. (2020). Is your organization ready for permanent WFH? Harvard Business Review. Retrieved from http://hbr.org/2020/08/is-your-organization-ready-for-permanent-wfh?ab=at_articlepage_relatedarticles_horizontal_slot1&registration=success

Ślązak, A. (2012). Przegląd badań dotyczących telepracy. Studia i Prace Wydziału Nauk Ekonomicznych i Zarządzania, 30, 219–232.

Wang, B., Liu, Y., Qian, J., & Parker, S.K. (2021). Achieving effective remote working during the COVID-19 pandemic: A work design perspective. Applied Psychology, 70, 16–59.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/h.2022.56.5.207-226
Date of publication: 2023-04-19 10:27:43
Date of submission: 2022-10-05 14:48:42


Statistics


Total abstract view - 774
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF - 0

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2023 Zenon Pokojski, Marcin Lipowski

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.