Dividend Payment and Development Abilities of Companies – Analysis on the Example of Listed Companies

Mirosław Wypych

Abstract


The relationship between dividend decisions and investment decisions of companies has been the subject of scientific analyses and inquiry for decades. They show that the tendency of companies to pay dividends and their amount are determined among other things by their stage of development. According to the theory of dividends based on the life cycle, most income dividend is spent on dividends by companies in the phase of maturity, because their investment capabilities are limited and the demand for external capital is little. The aim of the article is to check whether the assumptions of this theory are true in Polish conditions. The analysis included 75 companies, which in the years from 2014 to 2016 each year shared the profits with their shareholders. With regard to the regularity of paying dividends these companies have been defined as dividend companies. By studying the relationship between the amount of dividends, net financial results and the value of equity and assets of the companies, it was demonstrated to what extent the payment of dividends determines the change as far as their material and capital resources are concerned. The negative correlation between the amount paid dividends and an increase in assets and equity was confirmed, which is consistent with the theory of dividends based on the life cycle of a company.


Keywords


dividend; listed company; development potential

Full Text:

PDF (Język Polski)

References


Brigham E.F., Houston J.F., Podstawy zarządzania finansami, t. 2, PWE, Warszawa 2005.

DeAngelo H., DeAngelo L., Stulz R., Dividend Policy and the Earned/Contributed Capital Mix: A Test of the Life-cycle Theory, “Journal of Financial Economics” 2006, Vol. 81(2),

Fama E.F., French K.F., Testing Trade-Off and Pecking Order Predictions about Dividends and Debt, “Review of Financial Studies” 2002, Vol. 15(1).

Grullon G., Michaely R, Swaminathan B., Are Dividends Changes a Sign of Firm Maturity?, “Journal of Bussines” 2002, Vol 75(3).

McManus D., Gwilym O., Thomas S.H., Payment history, past returns and the performance of UK zero dividend stocks, “Managerial Finance” 2006, Vol. 32(6), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1108/03074350610666247.

Miller M., Modigliani F., Dividend Policy, Growth and Valuation of Shares, “The Journal of Finance” 1961, Vol. 34(4), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1086/294442.

Mueller D., A Life Cycle Theory of the Firm, “Journal Industrial Economics” 1972, Vol. 20(3), DOI: https://doi.org/10.2307/2098055.

Myers S.C., Majluf N.S., Corporate Financing and Investment Decisions When Firms Have Information That Investors Do Not Have, “Journal of Financial Economics” 1984, Vol. 13(2), DOI: https://doi.org/10.1016/0304-405X(84)90023-0.

Sierpińska-Sawicz A., Cykl życia a polityka dywidend i poziom realizowanych inwestycji, „Zeszyty Naukowe Uniwersytetu Szczecińskiego. Finanse, Rynki Finansowe, Ubezpieczenia” 2015, nr 74.

Targalski I., Przedsiębiorczość i rozwój firmy, Wydawnictwo Akademii Ekonomicznej, Kraków 1999.

Zarzecki D., Metody wyceny przedsiębiorstw, Fundacja Rozwoju Rachunkowości w Polsce, Warszawa 1999.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/h.2017.51.5.361
Date of publication: 2017-12-22 12:03:01
Date of submission: 2017-04-11 13:16:50


Statistics


Total abstract view - 717
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF (Język Polski) - 0

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2017 Mirosław Wypych

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.