The Aesthetic Value of Literary Works  in Roman Ingarden’s Philosophy

Hicham Jakha

doi:10.17951/kw.2021.32.165-185

The Aesthetic Value of Literary Works in Roman Ingarden’s Philosophy

Hicham Jakha

Abstract

In this paper, I attempt to formulate an Ingardenian conception of the literary work’s aesthetic value. Following Mitscherling’s lead, I attempt to place Ingarden’s aesthetics within his overall phenomenological-ontological project. That is, I argue that Ingarden’s aesthetics can only be properly fathomed in the context of his ontological deliberations, since, as he himself often enunciated, all his philosophical investigations constitute a realist rejoinder to Husserl’s turn toward transcendental idealism. To this end, I bring together insights from his aesthetics and ontology to establish a coherent account of values, where artistic and aesthetic values are analyzed as they manifest themselves in the literary work of art. By attending to the ontology of its aesthetic (and artistic) values, I argue, the literary work’s stratified formation becomes more explicit.

Keywords

Roman Ingarden; aesthetic value; artistic value; the literary work of art; ontology; aesthetics

Full Text:

PDF

References

Ameriks, Karl. “Husserl’s Realism.” The Philosophical Review 86, no. 4 (1977): 498–519. DOI: 10.2307/2184565

Chojna, Wojciech. “Ontology of the Work of Art: The Musical Work; The Picture; The Architectural Work; The Film by Roman Ingarden, Raymond Meyer, John T. Goldthwait.” The Journal of Aesthetics and Art Criticism 48, no. 1 (1990): 85–87. DOI: 10.2307/431204

Dziemidok, Bohdan. “Ingarden’s Theory of Values and the Evaluation of the Work of Art.” In On the Aesthetics of Roman Ingarden: Interpretations and Assessments. Edited by Bohdan Dziemidok, Peter J. McCormick, 71–100. Dordrecht and Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1989.

Haefliger, Gregor. “Ingarden Und Husserls Transzendentaler Idealismus.” Husserl Studies 7, no. 2 (1990): 103–121. DOI: 10.1007/BF00157156

Hall, Harrison. “Was Husserl a Realist or an Idealist?” In Husserl, Intentionality and Cognitive Science. Edited by Hubert L. Dreyfus, Harrison Hall, 169–190. Cambridge, MA: MIT Press, 1982.

Holmes, Richard H. “Is Transcendental Phenomenology Committed to Idealism?” The Monist 59, no. 1 (1975): 98–114. DOI: 10.5840/monist19755912

Husserl, Edmund. Ideas Pertaining to a Pure Phenomenology and Phenomenological Philosophy. First Book. Translated by Fred Kersten, vol. 2. Dordrecht and Boston: Kluwer Academic Publishers, 1983.

Ingarden, Roman. “Aesthetic Experience and Aesthetic Object.” Philosophy and Phenomenological Research 21, no. 3 (1961): 289–313. DOI: 10.2307/2105148

Ingarden, Roman. “Artistic and Aesthetic Values.” The British Journal of Aesthetics 4, no. 3 (1964): 198–213. DOI: 10.1093/bjaesthetics/4.3.198

Ingarden, Roman. Controversy over the Existence of the World. Edited by Jan Hartman. Translated by Arthur Szylewicz, vol. 1. Frankfurt am Main: Peter Lang GmbH, 2013.

Ingarden, Roman. Ontology of the Work of Art: The Musical Work, the Picture, the Architectural Work, the Film. Translated by Raymond Meyer, John T. Goldthwait. Athens: Ohio University Press, 1989.

Ingarden, Roman. The Literary Work of Art. Translated by George G. Grabowicz. Evanston: Northwestern University Press, 1973.

Ingarden, Roman. “What We Do Not Know about Values.” In Man and Value. Translated by Arthur Szylewicz, 131–163. München: Philosophia Verlag, 1983.

Kant, Immanuel. Critique of Judgement. Edited by Nicholas Walker. Translated by James C. Meredith. Oxford and New York: Oxford University Press, 2007.

Kocay, Victor. “Roman Ingarden’s Unique Conception of Aesthetic Objects.” In Phenomenology World-Wide: Foundations, Expanding Dynamics, Life Engagements: A Guide for Research and Study. Edited by Anna-Teresa Tymieniecka, 202–210. Dordrecht: Springer Science+Business Media, 2002.

Küng, Guido. “Husserl on Pictures and Intentional Objects.” The Review of Metaphysics 26, no. 4 (1973): 670–680.

Küng, Guido. “The World as Noema and as Referent.” Journal of the British Society for Phenomenology 3, no. 1 (1972): 15–26. DOI: 10.1080/00071773.1972.11006220

Küng, Guido. “Welterkennen Und Textinterpretation Bei Roman Ingarden Und Nelson Goodman.” Grazer Philosophische Studien 44, no. 1 (1993): 69–90. DOI: 10.1163/18756735-90000520

Küng, Guido. “Zum Lebenswerk von Roman Ingarden. Ontologie, Erkenntnistheorie Und Metaphysik.” In Die Münchener Phänomenologie. Edited by Helmut Kuhn, Eberhard Avé-Lallemant, and Reinhold Gladiator, 158–173. Den Hague: Nijhoff, 1975.

Makota, Janina. “Roman Ingarden’s Controversy with Edmund Husserl.” In Roman Ingarden a Filozofia Naszego Czasu. Edited by Adam Węgrzecki, 283–295. Kraków: Polskie Towarzystwo Filozoficzne, 1995.

Mitscherling, Jeff. “Roman Ingarden’s Aesthetics.” Philosophy Compass 7, no. 7 (2012): 436–47. DOI: 10.1111/j.1747-9991.2012.00493.x.

Mitscherling, Jeff. Roman Ingarden’s Ontology and Aesthetics. Ottawa: University of Ottawa Press, 1997.

Sokolowski, Robert. “On the Motives Which Led Husserl to Transcendental Idealism.” The Journal of Philosophy 74, no. 3 (1977): 176–180. DOI: 10.2307/2025608

Szyszkowska, Małgorzata A. “Roman Ingarden’s Theory of Aesthetic Experience. From Idea to Experience and Back.” In Roman Ingarden and His Times. Edited by Dominika Czakon, Natalia Anna Michna, and Leszek Sosnowski, 223–238. Kraków: Księgarnia Akademicka, 2020.

Thomasson, Amie L. Fiction and Metaphysics. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press, 1999.

Wallner, Ingrid M. “In Defense of Husserl’s Transcendental Idealism: Roman Ingarden’s Critique Re-Examined.” Husserl Studies 4, no. 1 (1987): 3–43. DOI: 10.1007/BF00375881

DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/kw.2021.32.165-185
Date of publication: 2022-04-17 23:42:02
Date of submission: 2021-12-13 17:35:41

Statistics

Total abstract view - 5418

Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF - 0