Peculiarities of the Dispositional Component of Social Perception of Senior Preschoolers with Children’s Cerebral Palsy

Vadym Kobylchenko, Iryna Omelchenko

Abstract


The article emphasizes that the formation of social perception is an important task of special education since it is in the preschool period that the foundations of social competence are laid – an important component of life competences as an integral characteristic of the psyche and personality. It has been substantiated that the dispositional component of social perception is decisive because internal (figurative) and external (motor) acts of social and perceptual activity are carried out on the basis of an attitude, are derived from it and mediated by it. The article also summarizes the results of the study of the dispositional component of social perception, reveals the specifics of the interaction of a child with infantile cerebral palsy with other family members. In the research, the authors used theoretical and empirical methods, as well as methods of mathematical statistics. The results of the study indicate, in general, a low level of formation of the dispositional component of social perception in children with cerebral palsy. The obtained data allow to conclude that for preschoolers with cerebral palsy, the family is the reference group that significantly influences the formation of attitudes and types of attitudes towards other people.

Keywords


dispositional component of social perception; senior preschoolers; cerebral palsy; family

References


Agavelyan, O.K. (1999). Sotsialno-pertseptivnyie osobennosti detey s narusheniyami razvitiya. Chelyabinsk: Izdatel Tatyana Lure.

Andreeva, G.M., Dontsov, A.I. (1981). Mejlichnostnoe vospriyatie v gruppe. Moskva: MGU.

Babych, N.M. (2019). Komunikatyvnyi potentsial doshkilnykiv z porushenniamy zoru ta intelektu. Monohrafiia. Saarbrücken: LAP Lambert Academic Publishing.

Barabanschikov, V.A. (2006). Psihologiya vospriyatiya. Organizatsiya i razvitie pertseptivnogo protsessa. Moskva: Kogito-TSentr, Vyisshaya shkola psihologii.

Bodalev, A.A. (1982). Vospriyatie i ponimanie cheloveka chelovekom. Moskva: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta.

Bruner, D. (1977). Psihologiya poznaniya. Za pridelami neposredstvennoy informatsii. Moskva: Progress.

Chartishvili, Sh.N. (1971). Vliyanie potrebnosti na vospriyatie i ustanovku. Voprosyi psihologii, № 1, 95–105.

Djeyms, U. (1991). Psihologiya. Moskva: Pedagogika.

Dobryakov, I.V., Kryijko, E.V. (2004). Psihicheskoe razvitie detey s tserebralnyimi paralichami: osobennosti, otkloneniya, rasstroystva, psihokorrektsiya i psihoterapiya. Vosstanovitelnoe lechenie detey s porajeniyami tsentralnoy nervnoy sistemyi i oporno-dvigatelnogo apparata: metodicheskie rekomendatsii. Sankt-Peterburg: Izdatelskiy dom SPbMAPO.

Eliava, N.L. (1961). K voprosu o roli ustanovki v protsessah vospriyatiya. Voprosyi psihologii, № 1, 73–80.

Hudym, I. (2008). Korektsiino-rozvyvalna prohrama formuvannia neverbalnykh zasobiv spilkuvannia u doshkilnykiv z porushenniam zoru. Defektolohiia, № 1, 3–10.

Khanzeruk, L.O. (2012). Emotsiino-tsinnisnyi rozvytok doshkilnykiv z dytiachymy tserebralnymy paralichamy. Aktualni pytannia korektsiinoi osvity, Vyp. 3, 263–274.

Kobylchenko, V., Omelchenko, I. (2020). Spetsialna psykholohiia: pidruchnyk. Kyiv: VTs «Akademiia».

Kobylchenko, V.V. (2010). Sotsialno-psykholohichni osnovy rozvytku ta korektsii osobystosti pidlitka v normi i pry patolohii zoru. Monohrafiia. Kyiv: Osvita Ukrainy.

Labunskaya, V.A. (1999). Ekspressiya cheloveka: obschenie i mejlichnostnoe poznanie. Rostov-na-Donu: Feniks.

Lubovskiy, V.I., Rozanova, T.V., Solntseva, L.I. (red.). (2005). Spetsialnaya psihologiya: ucheb. posobie. Moskva: Izdatelskiy tsentr «Akademiya».

Mykolaichuk, M.I. (2007). Osnovy psykhokorektsiinoi dopomohy bratam ta sestram ditei z psykhofizychnymy vadamy. Praktychna psykholohiia ta sotsialna robota, № 9, 18–23.

Petrovskaya, L.A. (1989). Kompetentnost v obschenii. Sotsialno-psihologicheskiy trening. Moskva: Izd-vo Mosk. un-ta.

Piaje, J. (1969). Izbrannyie psihologicheskie trudyi. Moskva: Prosveschenie.

Pirozhenko, T. (2005). Movlennia dytyny. Psykholohiia movlennievykh dosiahnen dytyny. Kyiv: Hlavnyk.

Slepovich, E.S., Polyakov, A.M. (red.). (2012). Spetsialnaya psihologiya: ucheb. posobie. Minsk: Vyisheyshaya shkola.

Sushkov, I.R. (2008). Psihologicheskie otnosheniya cheloveka v sotsialnoy sisteme. Moskva: Izd-vo «Institut psihologii RAN».

Tkacheva, V.V. (2009). Psihologicheskie osobennosti roditeley, imeyuschih detey s detskim tserebralnyim paralichom. Spetsialnaya psihologiya, № 1, 53–62.

Uznadze, D.N. (1966). Psihologicheskie issledovaniya. Moskva: Nauka.

Valitova, I.E. (2006). Vzaimootnosheniya v seme mejdu siblingami, odin iz kotoryih – rebenok s osobennostyami v razvitii. Mir psihologii, № 4, 55–67.

Yadov, V.A. (2000). Dispozitsionnaya kontseptsiya lichnosti. Sotsialnaya psihologiya v trudah otechestvennyih psihologov. Moskva: Piter.




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/en.2022.7.93-109
Date of publication: 2022-12-28 15:43:56
Date of submission: 2021-03-01 10:32:17


Statistics


Total abstract view - 653
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF (Русский) - 0

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2022 Annales Universitatis Mariae Curie-Sklodowska, sectio N – Educatio Nova

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.