Relationship Quality of Pregnant and Non-pregnant Women with and without Children

Paulina Banaszkiewicz, Karolina Górnik-Horn

Abstract


The study aimed to determine differences in selected parameters of women’s relationship quality depending on whether they already have children with their current partner and whether they are currently pregnant. The study included overall relationship satisfaction, attachment anxiety and avoidance, and jealousy. The following scales were used: the Couple Satisfaction Index CSI-32, the Experience in Close Relationships – Revised, and the Multidimensional Jealousy Scale. The participants were 274 non-pregnant women and 105 pregnant women who were in a romantic relationship at the time of the study. The analyses showed that relationship satisfaction was higher among pregnant women. In this group, lower attachment anxiety and attachment avoidance, as well as weaker cognitive jealousy were also observed. Overall relationship satisfaction was lower in the group of women who had children, although when considering pregnancy, it was found that pregnant women showed the same level of relationship satisfaction regardless of whether or not they already had offspring. The research largely confirmed the higher relationship quality among pregnant women and partially lower relationship quality among women with children. However, the differences in terms of jealousy turned out to be inconsistent with the assumptions. The study’s conclusions were discussed in relation to the existing literature.


Keywords


relationship satisfaction; attachment anxiety and avoidance; jealousy; relationship quality of pregnant women; relationship quality of women with children

Full Text:

PDF (Język Polski)

References


Al-Shawaf, L., Conroy-Beam, D., Asao, K., Buss, D.M. (2016). Human Emotions: An Evolutionary Psychological Perspective. Emotion Review, 8(2), 173–186. DOI: 10.1177/1754073914565518

Banaszkiewicz, P (2019). Studium emocji zazdrości romantycznej Polaków. Lublin: Wydawnictwo UMCS.

Bianciardi, E., Vito, C., Betrò, S., Stefano, A. de, … Niolu, C. (2020). The Anxious Aspects of Insecure Attachment Styles Are Associated with Depression Either in Pregnancy or in the Postpartum Period. Annals of General Psychiatry, 19(51). DOI: 10.1186/s12991-020-00301-7

Burch, R.L., Gallup, G.G. (2004). Pregnancy as a Stimulus for Domestic Violence. Journal of Family Violence, 19(4), 243–247. DOI: 10.1023/B:JOFV.0000032634.40840.48

Buss, D.M. (2019). Evolutionary Psychology: The New Science of the Mind. New York: Routledge.

Feeney, J.A. (2008). Adult Romantic Attachment: Developments in the Study of Couple Relationships. W: J. Cassidy, P.R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research, and Clinical Applications (s. 456–481). New York: The Guilford Press.

Fraley, R.C., Roisman, G.I. (2019). The Development of Adult Attachment Styles: Four Lessons. Current Opinion in Psychology, 25, 26–30. DOI: 10.1016/j.copsyc.2018.02.008

Fraley, R.C., Waller, N.G., Brennan, K.A. (2000). An Item-Response Theory Analysis of Self-Report Measures of Adult Attachment. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 78(2), 350–365. DOI: 10.1037//0022-3514.78.2.350

Funk, J.L., Rogge, R.D. (2007). Testing the Ruler with Item Response Theory: Increasing Precision of Measurement for Relationship Satisfaction with the Couples Satisfaction Index. Journal of Family Psychology, 21(4), 572–583. DOI: 10.1037/0893-3200.21.4.572

Göbel, A., Barkmann, C., Arck, P., Hecher, K., … Mudra, S. (2019). Couples’ Prenatal Bonding to the Fetus and the Association with One’s Own and Partner’s Emotional Well-Being and Adult Romantic Attachment Style. Midwifery, 79. DOI: 10.1016/j.midw.2019.102549

Huss, B., Pollmann-Schult, M. (2020). Relationship Satisfaction across the Transition to Parenthood: The Impact of Conflict Behavior. Journal of Family Issues, 41(3), 383–411. DOI: 10.1177/0192513X19876084

Katz-Wise, S.L., Priess, H.A., Hyde, J.S. (2010). Gender-Role Attitudes and Behavior Across the Transition to Parenthood. Developmental Psychology, 46(1), 18–28. DOI: 10.1037/a0017820

Lubiewska, K., Głogowska, K., Mickiewicz, K., Wojtynkiewicz, E., Izdebski, P. (2016). Skala Experience in Close Relationships-Revised: struktura, rzetelność oraz skrócona wersja skali w polskiej próbie. Psychologia Rozwojowa, 21(1), 49–63. DOI: 10.4467/20843879PR.16.004.4793

Martins, A., Alves, S., Narciso, I., Canavarro, M.C., Pereira, M. (2015). Reliability and Validity of the Portuguese Version of the Revised Anticipated Sexual Jealousy Scale. Paper presented at the III Congresso Nacional da APTC, Coimbra, Portugal.

Massar, K., Buunk, A.P. (2019). Expecting and Competing? Jealous Responses among Pregnant and Nonpregnant Women. Evolutionary Psychology, 17(1). DOI: 10.1177/1474704919833344

Massar, K., Buunk, A.P., Gruijters, S.L.K. (2013). Pregnant Women’s View on Their Relationship: A Comparison with Nonpregnant Women. Interpersona: An International Journal on Personal Relationships, 7(2), 272–281. DOI: 10.5964/ijpr.v7i2.122

McNamara, J., Townsend, M.L., Herbert, J.S. (2019). A Systemic Review of Maternal Wellbeing and Its Relationship with Maternal Fetal Attachment and Early Postpartum Bonding. PLoS ONE, 14(7). DOI: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220032

Mikulincer, M., Shaver, P.R. (2007). Attachment in Adulthood: Structure, Dynamics, and Change. New York: The Guilford Press.

Moller, K., Hwang, P.C., Wickberg, B. (2008). Couple Relationship and Transition to Parenthood: Does Workload at Home Matter? Journal of Reproductive and Infant Psychology, 26(1), 57–68. DOI: 10.1080/02646830701355782

Pfeiffer, S.M., Wong, P.T.P. (1989). Multidimensional Jealousy. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 6(2), 181–196. DOI: 10.1177/026540758900600203

Ponti, L., Smorti, M., Ghinassi, S., Tani, F. (2021). The Relationship between Romantic and Prenatal Maternal Attachment: The Moderating Role of Social Support. International Journal of Psychology, 56(1), 143–150. DOI: 10.1002/ijop.12676

Radev, M.T., Hedrih, V. (2017). Psychometric Properties of the Multidimensional Jealousy Scale (MJS) on a Serbian Sample. Psihologija, 50(4), 521–534. DOI: 10.2298/PSI170121012T

Scheppingen, M.A. van, Denissen, J.J.A., Chung, J.M., Tambs, K., Bleidorn, W. (2018). Self-Esteem and Relationship Satisfaction during the Transition to Motherhood. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 114(6), 973–991. DOI: 10.1037/pspp0000156

Shaver, P.R., Fraley, R.C. (2008). Attachment, Loss, and Grief: Bowlby’s Views and Current Controversies. W: J. Cassidy, P.R. Shaver (Eds.), Handbook of Attachment: Theory, Research, and Clinical Applications (s. 48–77). New York: The Guilford Press.

Theiss, J.A., Solomon, D.H. (2006). Coupling Longitudinal Data and Multilevel Modeling to Examine the Antecedents and Consequences of Jealousy Experiences in Romantic Relationships: A Test of the Relational Turbulence Model. Human Communication Research, 32(4), 469–503. DOI: 10.1111/j.1468-2958.2006.00284.x

Tissera, H., Auger, E., Séguin, L., Kramer, M.S., Lydon, J.E. (2021). Happy Prenatal Relationships, Healthy Postpartum Mothers: A Prospective Study of Relationship Satisfaction, Postpartum Stress, and Health. Psychology & Health, 36(4), 461–477. DOI: 10.1080/08870446.2020.1766040

Vollmann, M., Sprang, S., Brink, F. van den (2019). Adult Attachment and Relationship Satisfaction: The Mediating Role of Gratitude Toward the Partner. Journal of Social and Personal Relationships, 36(11–12), 3875–3886. DOI: 10.1177/0265407519841712

Walsh, J., Hepper, E.G. Marshall, B.J. (2014). Investigating Attachment, Caregiving, and Mental Health: A Model of Maternal-Fetal Relationships. BMC Pregnancy Childbirth, 14(1). DOI: 10.1186/s12884-014-0383-1




DOI: http://dx.doi.org/10.17951/j.2024.37.2.7-22
Date of publication: 2024-09-30 16:58:39
Date of submission: 2023-09-21 22:58:03


Statistics


Total abstract view - 428
Downloads (from 2020-06-17) - PDF (Język Polski) - 233

Indicators



Refbacks

  • There are currently no refbacks.


Copyright (c) 2024 Paulina Banaszkiewicz, Karolina Górnik-Horn

Creative Commons License
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution 4.0 International License.